Cover not available
Article published In:
NOWELE
Vol. 76:2 (2023) ► pp.127–152

The rise and fall and rise of the digraph 〈oa〉 in English

ORCID logo | Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
The present paper examines the history of the digraph 〈oa〉 in English: it is relatively rare in OE and early ME, falls out of use in late ME, and reappears in the late fifteenth century. Different lexemes have been spelt with 〈oa〉 in the different language periods, but in the majority of cases, the vowel so represented is the reflex of early ME /ɔ:/ or OE o in an open syllable; hence, the digraph is clearly phonetically conditioned. The paper also investigates the graphotactic constraints on the orthographic variants 〈oa〉, 〈oCe〉, 〈oe〉.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.StE words with 〈oa〉: Etymology
  • 3.The history of 〈oa〉
    • 3.1Middle English uses of 〈oa〉
    • 3.2Early Modern English uses of 〈oa〉
      • A corpus of Middle English local documents (MELD)
      • The Paston Letters
      • Early English books online (EEBO)
      • The Malaga Corpus of Early Modern English scientific prose
    • 3.3Fifteenth-century professional scribes, early printers and spelling reformers
  • 4.The distribution of 〈oaC〉 vs. 〈oCe〉 vs. 〈oe〉
  • 5.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00077.ste
References (52)
References
Baddeley, S. & A. Voeste. 2012. Orthographies in early modern Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beadle, R. & C. Richmond (eds.). 2005. The Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century: part III. EETS SS 22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benskin, M. 2004. Chancery Standard. In C. Kay, C. Hough & I. Wotherspoon (eds.), New perspectives on English historical linguistics. Selected papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002. Volume II: Lexis and transmission, 1–40. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benskin, M., M. Laing, V. Karaiskos & K. Williamson. 2013. An electronic version of A linguistic atlas of late Mediaeval English. University of Edinburgh. [URL]
Carignan, C. 2018. An examination of oral articulation of vowel nasality in the light of the independent effects of nasalization on vowel quality. In A. Vietti, L. Spreafico, D. Mereu & V. Galatà (eds.), Studi AISV IV: Speech in the natural context, 19–40. Milan: Associazione Italiana Scienze della Voce. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clement, F. 1587. The petie schole with an English orthographie […] London: Thomas Vautrollier.Google Scholar
Coote, E. 1596. The English schoole-maister. London: Widow Orwin, for Ralph Jackson and Robert Dextar.Google Scholar
Crotch, W. J. B. 1928. The prologues and epilogues of William Caxton. EETS OS 176. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, N. 1963. The Paston letters: A selection in modern spelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004. The Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century: parts I and II. EETS SS 20–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. 1968. English pronunciation 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
DOEC = Healey et al. 2009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
eLALME: see Benskin et al. 2013Google Scholar
Early English Books Online (EEBO): [URL] [Accessed 27 January 2020]
Ellis, T. 1680. The English school […] London: John Darby, for the Author.Google Scholar
Gairdner, J. 1904. The Paston Letters, A.D. 1422–1509. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
García, A. M., J. C. Martín, D. M. Olalla, S. G. F. Corugedo, G. D. Caie. 2007–16. The Malaga corpus of early Modern English scientific prose. University of Málaga. [URL] [Accessed 25 January 2020]
Gil, A. 1619. Logonomia Anglica. Qua Gentis Sermo Facilis Addiscitur. London: John Beal.Google Scholar
Hanham, A. 1975. The Cely letters 1472–1488. EETS OS 273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1985. The Celys and their world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. 1969 [1569]. An orthographie. Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Healey, A. D., J. P. Wilkin & Xin Xiang. 2009. Dictionary of Old English web corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. [URL] [Accessed on 20 January 2020]
Hodges, R. 1644. A special help to orthographie […] London: Richard Cotes.Google Scholar
Huloet, R. & J. Higgins. 1572. Huloets dictionarie newelye corrected, amended, set in order and enlarged […] London: Thomas Marsh.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 2005. Vowels and consonants. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
LAEME = Laing. 2013Google Scholar
Laing, M. 2013. A linguistic atlas of early Middle English. University of Edinburgh. [URL] [Accessed 22 January 2020]
Liebl, C. 2006. The A and O of a medieval English sound-change: Prolegomena to a study of the origins and early geographical diffusion of /ɑ:/ > /ɔ:/. In N. Ritt et al. (eds.), Medieval English and its heritage. Structure, meaning and mechanisms of change, 19–35. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Luick, K. 1914–40. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Stuttgart: Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A., M. Samuels & M. Benskin. 1986. A linguistic atlas of late mediaeval English, Vols. I–IV. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
MEG-C = Stenroos et al. 2011Google Scholar
MELD = Stenroos et al. 2017Google Scholar
Minkova, D. 2014. A historical phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary Online: [URL]
The project Gutenberg ebook of the Paston letters. Vols. I–VI1, edited by James Gairdner. [URL] [Accessed 28 January 2020]
Puttenham, G. 1589. The Arte of Poesie. London: Richard Field.Google Scholar
Rutkowska, H. 2016. Orthographic regularization in early Modern English printed books: grapheme distribution and vowel length indication. In C. Russi (ed.), Current trends in historical sociolinguistics, 165–193. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmon, V. 1989. John Rastell and the normalization of early sixteenth-century orthography. In L. E. Breivik, A. Hille & S. Johansson (eds.), Essays on English language in honour of Bertil Sundby, 289–301. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
1999. Orthography and punctuation. In R. Lass et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, 13–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, M. L. 1963. Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies 441. 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972. Linguistic evolution, with special reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scragg, D. G. 1974. A history of English spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, G. F. 2016. Long-vowel shifts in English, c. 1050–1700: Evidence from spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Coda approximants in British English: A diachronic and synchronic account. In R. P. Lorido, C. Prado-Alonso & P. Rodriguez-Puente (eds.), Of ye Olde Englisch langage and textes: New perspectives on Old and Middle English language and literature, 109–137. Berlin: Lang.Google Scholar
Stenroos, M., M. Mäkinen, S. Horobin & J. Smith. 2011. The Middle English grammar corpus, version 2011.1. University of Stavanger. URL: [URL] [Accessed 28 January 2020]
Stenroos, M., K. V. Thengs & G. Bergstrøm. 2017. A corpus of Middle English local documents. University of Stavanger. [URL] [Accessed 19 January 2020]
Strang, B. M. H. 1970. A history of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. 1888. A history of English sounds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Watt, D. 2007. Medieval women’s writing. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Wells, J. H. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weɫna, J. 1978. A diachronic grammar of English. Part one: phonology. Warszawa: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Wright, J. & E. M. Wright. 1924. An elementary historical New English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar