Cover not available
Review article published In:
NOWELE Volume 60/61 (January 2011)
[NOWELE 60/61] 2011
► pp. 187–198
Review article

Jørgen Rischel. Sound Structure in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. XX + 488 pp. 16 Tab. und 2 Karten.

| Volda University College
Published online: 1 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.60-61.09sch
References (24)
Literatur
Amundsen, S. 1964. ‘Le vocalisme féroïen: essai de phonologie diachronique’. Froðskaparrit 131:54–61.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. 1956. ‘Urnordisk gestumR og dens betydning for i-omlyden’. In: S. Aakjær et al. (Hg.), Festskrift til Peter Skautrup på sekstiårsdagen, 21. januar 1956. Aarhus, 9–15.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. 1968. ‘The vowel system of Faroese and the Faroese verschärfung’. M.I.T. Quarterly Progress Report 901:228–40.Google Scholar
Bæksted, A. 1943. Runerne, deres historie og brug. København.Google Scholar
Brown, J. M. 1965. From Ancient Thai to Modern Dialects. Bangkok.Google Scholar
Chapman, K. G. 1962. Icelandic-Norwegian Linguistic Relationships. Norsk tidsskrift for sprogvidenskap, suppl. to vol. vii1. Oslo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Patterns of English. New York.Google Scholar
Dr = Jacobsen, L. & E. Moltke. 1941–42. Danmarks runeindskrifter. København.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. 1960. ‘Some remarks on the function of stress with special reference to the Germanic languages’. Congrès International des Sciences Anthropologiques et Ethnologiques. Compte-rendu de la troisième session, Bruxelles 1948. Bruxelles, 86–8.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N., F. Gregersen & H. Basbøll. 2007. ‘In Memoriam Jørgen rischel 1934–2007’. Phonetica 641:194–8.Google Scholar
KJ = Krause, W. & H. Jankuhn. 1966. Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark, 1–2. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philos.-hist. Klasse, 3. Folge, Nr. 651. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Niyr = Olsen, M. et al. 1941– (in Bearbeitung). Norges innskrifter med de yngre runer. Oslo.Google Scholar
Rischel, J. 1964. ‘Stress, juncture, and the syllabification in phonemic description’. In: H. G. Lunt (Hg.), Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Linguistics 1962. The Hague, 85–93.Google Scholar
1966. ‘Phoneme, grapheme, and the “importance” of distinctions. Functional aspects of the scandinavian runic reform’. Research Group for Quantitative Linguitics, Interim Report No. 1. Stockholm, 1–21.Google Scholar
1989. ‘Fifty years of research on the Mlabri language: a re-appraisal of old and recent fieldwork data’. Acta Orientalia 501:49–78.Google Scholar
1991. ‘The relevance of phonetics for phonology: A commentary’. Phonetica 481:233–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Minor Mlabri. A hunter-gatherer language of Northern Indochina. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
1998. ‘Structural and functional aspects of tone split in thai’. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 301:7–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. ‘A unified theory of Nordic i-umlaut, syncope, and stød’. In: Early and Pre-Historic Language Development in North-Western Europe. NOWELE 54/551:191–235. Odense.Google Scholar
Santesson, L. 1989. ‘En blekingsk blotinskrift’. Fornvännen 841:221–9.Google Scholar
Schulte, M. 1998. Grundfragen der Umlautphonemisierung. Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde 171. Berlin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Rez. zu Early and Pre-Historic Language Development in North-Western Europe. NOWELE 54/551. ( Paul und Braunes ) Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur [im Druck].Google Scholar
2010. ‘The rise of the younger fuþark. The invisible hand of change’. NOWELE 601:45–68 (in diesem Band).Google Scholar
Senft, G., J. -O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Hg.) 2009. Culture and Language Use. Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 21. Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar