Review article published In:
NOWELE Volume 64/65 (April 2012)[NOWELE 64/65] 2012
► pp. 227–236
Review article
. Memory, Mind and Language. Proceedings of the.Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010. IX + 308 pp. 20 ill. and 18 tab..
References (17)
Anderson, S. R. & D. W. Lightfoot. 2002. The Language Organ. Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge. 
Croft, W. 1996. ‘Linguistic selection: an utterance-based evolutionary theory of language change’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 191:99–139.
Dummett, M. 1993. The Seas of Language. Oxford.
Foley, J. M. 2002. How to Read an Oral Poem. Urbana.
Götzsche, H. 1994. Derivational Syntactic Structures. A contrastive linguistic study in the system of Danish and Swedish (2nd ed.). Doctoral diss., Göteborg Universitet.
Harnad, S. & I. Dror. 2006. ‘Distributed cognition’. Pragmatics and cognition 141:209–13.
Keller, R. 1994. Sprachwandel. Von der unsichtbaren hand in der Sprache. Basel & Tübingen. [Engl. trans.: On Language change. the invisible hand in language. London.]
Kindt, W. 2010. Irrtümer und andere Defizite in der Linguistik. Wissenschaftslogische Probleme […] Frankfurt am Main.
Kravchenko, A. 2008. Biology of cognition and Linguistic analysis. From nonrealist linguistics to a realistic language science. Frankfurt am Main.
Van Lancker, D., G. J. Canter & D. Terbeek. 1981. ‘Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: acoustic and phonetic cues’. Journal of Speech and hearing Research 241:330–35.
Langerfeld, C. 2009. ‘Zur Differenzierung des Metaphernbegriffs’. Synaps 231:31–52.
Maturana, H. & F. Varela. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition. The realization of the living (2nd ed.). Boston studies in the Philosophy of science 421. Boston.
Maturana, H., J. Mpodozis & J. -C. Letelier. 1995. ‘Brain, language, and the origin of human mental functions’. Biological Research 281:15–26.
Mesthrie, R. (ed.). 2001. Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mæhlum, B. 1999. Mellom Syll o Khrybd Forlrnberepet hto r pråvtenp. Oslo.
Wray, A. 2009. ‘Identifying formulaic language: persistent challenges and new opportunities’. In: R. Corrigan et al. (eds.), Formulaic Language, 1. Distribution and historical change. Typological Studies in Language 821. Amsterdam, pp. 27–51.
Wray, A. & T. Fitzpatrick. 2008. ‘Why can’t you just leave it alone? Deviations from memorized language as a gauge of nativelike competence’. In: F. Meunier & S. Granger (eds.), Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and teaching. Amsterdam, pp. 123–47.