The aim of this article is to measure the indexes of productivity of the prefix ful- and the suffix -ful in Old English adjective formation. This analysis is based on Baayen’s framework, which comprises different measures on productivity. The major sources of the analysis are The Dictionary of Old English Corpus and the lexical database of Old English Nerthus. This study of productivity allows for a diachronic perspective on the evolution of these affixes from the Old English period to the present. The main conclusion drawn from this analysis is that the suffix -ful is more productive than its prefixal counterpart, which implies that more productive patterns are still maintained in Present-day English in contradistinction to the less productive ones.
2023. Old English class I strong verbs lemmatisation: A morphological generation approach. Studia Neophilologica 95:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
García Fernández, Laura
2021. Insights into Old English Lexicography: Lemmatisation ofgĀnand Its Prefix-Formations using a Corpus-Based Database. International Journal of Lexicography 34:4 ► pp. 493 ff.
2018. From traditional to electronic lexicography: the dictionaries of Old English. Lexicography 4:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
Mendaza, Raquel Mateo
2015. Matching productivity indexes and diachronic evolution: The Old English affixesful-, -isc, -cund, and-ful. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 60:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.