Article published In:
NOWELEVol. 70:2 (2017) ► pp.121–134
The Proto-Germanic irregular weak verbs of class I
This paper attempts to explain the origin and development of a subgroup of the Proto-Germanic weak verbs of class I (Gothic bugjan, waurkjan, þugkjan, þagkjan, sokjan and brukjan). The core of this group consists of Proto-Indo-European zero-grade primary *-i̯e/o presents, which all developed a j-present, ablauting preterit and *-tó- participle in Early Proto-Germanic. In so doing, they came to violate the requirement that each ablauting verb must possess distinct present and preterit stems. With the introduction of a new preterit plural vowel in the ablaut model of classes V and VI, this problem was solved for the primary *-i̯e/o presents belonging to these. Owing to the dominance of the present tense within the strong paradigm, a remodelling of the preterit was also the preferred solution for the remaining verbs, and this was eventually found in the innovation of new weak forms through an analogy involving their *-tó- participle.
Article outline
- 1.The weak preterit
- 2.The origin of the irregular weak verbs of class I
- 3.The reconstruction of *brūkjan-
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Beekes, R. & Beek, L. van
2010 Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.
Braune, W. & Reiffenstein, I.
2004a Althochdeutsche Grammatik. 151. Aufl. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 
Braune, W. & Heidermanns, F.
2004b Gotische Grammatik. 201. Aufl. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Bammesberger, A.
1986 Der Aufbau des germanischen Verbalsystems. Heidelberg: C. Winter Universitätsverlag.
Coetsem, F. van
1990 Ablaut and Reduplication in the Germanic verb. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Collitz, H.
1912 Das schwache Präteritum und Seine Vorgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Gallée, J. & Tiefenbach, H.
1993 Altsächsische Grammatik. 31. Aufl. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Heidermanns, F.
1993 Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hill, E.
2010 A case study in grammaticalized inflectional morphology: Origin and development of the Germanic weak preterite. Diachronica 27:3.411–458.
Hogg, R.
1992 A Grammar of Old English – Volume 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hogg, R. & Fulk, R.
2011 A Grammar of Old English – Volume 2: Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kolb, H.
1964 Über ‘brauchen‘ als Modalverb. Zeitschrift für deutsche Sprache 201.64–78.
Kortlandt, F.
1989 The Germanic Weak preterit. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 281.101–109.
Kroonen, G.
2013 Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill.
Lloyd, A. et al.
1988– Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Althochdeutschen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
Lühr, R.
1984 Reste der Athematischen Konjugation in den Germanischen Sprachen. In Untermann, J. & Brogyanyi, B. (eds.), Das Germanische und die Rekonstruktion der Indogermanischen Grundsprache, 25–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mailhammer, R.
2007 The Germanic Strong Verbs: Foundations and Development of a New System. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Ringe, D.
2006 A Linguistic History of English, Volume 1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rix, H. et al.
2001 Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben: die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Seebold, E.
1970 Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wö̈rterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton.
Sturtevant, A.
1951 Notes on Certain Variations and Forms in the Old Germanic Dialects. Modern Language Review 66:5.300–304.
Szemérenyi, O.
1980 Latin verbs in -uō, -uere
. In Izzo, H. (ed.), Italic and Romance: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Ernst Pulgram, 9–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tops, G.
1974 The Origin of the Germanic Dental Preterit: A Critical Research History Since 1912. Leiden: Brill.
Vaan, M. de
2008 Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.
Vleeskruyer, R.
1953 The Life of St. Chad: An Old English Homily (diss.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.