Unity and diversity in basic color terms
A comparison of Germanic, Slavic, and Romance
We develop a methodology for assessing the degree of
unity versus diversity in Stage V basic color terms in Germanic, Romance,
and Slavic languages. We make use of the Glottolog language list, with
principled modifications, and of a notion “extended cognate set”, which
includes all terms derived from the same etymon plus genus-internal loans.
We thus provide a solid underpinning of the intuitive observation that color
term diversity is minimal in Germanic, extensive in Romance, and at an
intermediate level in Slavic, as well as providing a methodology that should
be more generally applicable in lexical typology.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and methodology
- 1.1Colors
- 1.2Languages and sources
- 1.3Extended cognate sets
- 1.4Database
- 2.The data: Qualitative analysis
- 2.1Germanic color terms
- 2.1.1Germanic black
- 2.1.2Germanic white
- 2.1.3Germanic red
- 2.1.4Germanic green
- 2.1.5Germanic yellow
- 2.1.6Germanic blue
- 2.1.7Germanic summary
- 2.2Romance color terms
- 2.2.1Romance black
- 2.2.2Romance white
- 2.2.3Romance red
- 2.2.4Romance green
- 2.2.5Romance yellow
- 2.2.6Romance blue
- 2.2.7Romance summary
- 2.3Slavic color terms
- 2.3.1Slavic black
- 2.3.2Slavic white
- 2.3.3Slavic red
- 2.3.4Slavic green
- 2.3.5Slavic yellow
- 2.3.6Slavic blue
- 2.3.7Slavic summary
- 3.Quantitative analysis
- 4.Conclusions
- Author queries
-
Acknowledgments
-
Abbreviations used in the article and online database
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.