Article published in:
Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability TheoryEdited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 239–262
Chapter 11. Implications of the Developmental Stages of Language Acquisition for Classroom Teaching
Evelyn Doman | University of Macau
In the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), there has been an ongoing debate about the role of instruction between: (1) proponents of strong interface, who are those advocating the position that explicit instruction can lead to acquisition, as supported by advocates of the Grammar-Translation Method (GTM); (2) proponents of no interface, who are those advocating the position that instruction does not lead to acquisition and that input alone through implicit techniques is sufficient; and (3) proponents of weak interface, who are those leaning towards the middle, believing that instruction can lead to acquisition only if it is geared towards the next developmental stage that the learner is ready for, as detailed in the Teachability Hypothesis of Processability Theory (PT). The Teachability Hypothesis states that instruction is most effective when it reflects the stage just beyond the learners’ current interlanguage. The current study is a mixed-method experiment which provided instruction to three English classes at a Chinese university in Macau.Instruction was explicit, implicit, or developmentally moderated. The results show that students in the developmentally-moderated group outperformed their counterparts in the explicit and the implicit groups. This finding lends support to the weak-interface hypothesis.
Published online: 11 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.4.11dom
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.4.11dom
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Baten, Kristof
Roos, Jana
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
References
References
Allwright, R.L.
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M.
Corder, S.P.
DeKeyser, R.
Deller, S. & Rinvolucri, M.
Di Biase, B.
Doughy, C. & Williams, J.
Dulay, H.C., Burt, M.K. & Krashen, S.
Dyson, B.
Feng, H. & Zhang, S.M.
Håkansson, G. & Norrby, C.
Hong, C.
Hudson, T.
Jansen, L.
Jia, X.Y.
Johnston, M.
Keßler, J.U.
Keßler, J.U., Mansouri, F. & Liebner, M.
Kune, Z.
Lublin, N.
(2012) Texting that saves lives. From TED Talks, May. Retrieved on September 25, 2012 from http://www.ted.com/talks/nancy_lublin_texting_that_saves_lives.html
Ma, S.L.
Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L.
Murphy, B.
Pienemann, M.
(1992) Teachability Theory. Paper presented at the Language Acquisition Research Centre, National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia, 43-72.
Pienemann, M. & Johnston, M.
(1985) Towards an explanatory model of language acquisition. Paper presented at the
1985 Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum
, UCLA, February 22–24.
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.U.
Scott, P.
Teng, F.
Van Patten, B., & Cadierno, T.