Article published in:
Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages
Edited by Jörg-U. Keßler, Anke Lenzing and Mathias Liebner
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 5] 2016
► pp. 334
References

References

Alsina, A.
1996The role of argument structure in grammar: Evidence from Romance. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(2001) Lexical-Functional Syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., & Kanerva, J.
(1989) Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1): 1-50.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M.
(2001) Syntax and semantics. Lexical functional grammar. Vol. 34. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Y.
(2001) Lexical-functional grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Fabri, R.
(2008) Lexical functional grammar. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language acquisition: Development and second language learning (pp. 31-67). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A.
(2007) Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gerngross, G., & Puchta, H.
(2003a) Playway 3 rainbow edition. Teacher’s book. Innsbruck: Helbling/ Leipzig: Klett.Google Scholar
(2003b) Playway 4 rainbow edition. Teacher’s book. Innsbruck: Helbling & Leipzig: Klett.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.
(2000) Context-sensitive assessment of modern languages in primary (elementary) and secondary education: Scotland and the European experience. Language Testing 17(2), 123-143.Google Scholar
Lenzing, A.
(2013) The development of the grammatical system in early second language acquisition – The Multiple Constraints Hypothesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.
(2005) Second language research. Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development. Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M, & Lenzing, A.
(2015) Processability Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction, 2nd edition (pp. 159-179). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Mackey, A.
(1993) An empirical study of children’s ESL development and Rapid Profile. In P. McKay (Ed.), ESL development. Language and literacy in schools (Vol. 2; pp. 115-259). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., DiBiase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross- linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199-251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roos, J.
(2007) Spracherwerb und Sprachproduktion: Lernziele und Lernergebnisse im Englischunterricht der Grundschule. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar