Article published in:
Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages
Edited by Jörg-U. Keßler, Anke Lenzing and Mathias Liebner
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 5] 2016
► pp. 6578
References

References

Bedore, L.M., & Leonard, L.B.
(2005) Verb inflections and noun phrase morphology in the spontaneous speech of Spanish-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 195-225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D.
(2009) Specific Language Impairment as a language learning disability. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 2, 163-165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1992) Linguistic perspectives on Specific Language Impairment. Theorie des Lexicons. Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs 282. Düsseldorf: Seminar für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
DiBiase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18, 272-300.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P., Leonard, L., Stokes, S.F., & Wonga, A.
(2009) Morphosyntactic deficits in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. In S.-P. Law, B.S. Weekes, & A.W-Y. Wong (Eds.), Language disorders in speakers of Chinese (pp. 75-88). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fukuda, S., & Fukuda, S.
(2001) The acquisition of complex predicates in Japanese specifically language-impaired and normally developing children. Brain & Language, 77, 305–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, M.
(1994) Impairments of tense in a familial language disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 109-133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G.
(1997) Language impairment from a processing perspective. Working Papers, 46, 131-151. Lund: Dept of Linguistics, Lund University.Google Scholar
(2001) Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 85-99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Hansson, K.
(2000) Comprehension and production of relative clauses: A comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language, 27, 313-333 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, K., & Nettelbladt, U.
(1995) Grammatical characteristics of Swedish children with SLI. Journal of Speech, and Hearing Research, 38, 589-598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Leonard, L.
(2000) Specific Language Impairment in Swedish: The status of verb morphology and word order. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 848-864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, L., Leonard, L., & Swanson, L.
(1999) Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input; the contribution of frequency, sentence position and duration. Journal of Child Language, 26, 531 – 543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T., Fukuda, S., & Fukuda, S.
(2009) Differences between grammatical and lexical development in Japanese specific language impairment: A case study. Poznán Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45, 221-221.Google Scholar
Jakubowitz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C, & Gerard, C.
(1998) Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113-160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jörgensen, N.
1976Meningsbyggnaden i talad svenska. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Josefsson, G.
(2004) Input and output. Sentence patterns in child and adult Swedish. In G. Josefsson, C. Platzack, & G. Håkansson (Eds.), The acquisition of Swedish grammar (pp. 95- 133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L.
(1989) Language learnability and specific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 179-203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Some reflections on the study of children with specific language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25(2), 169-171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G.
(1999) A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 383- 420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M., & Wexler, K.
(1996) Towards tense as a clinical marker of Specific Language Impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239 -1257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka Welty, Y., Watanabe, J., & Menn, L.
(2002) Language production in SLI Japanese preschoolers. In E. Fava (Ed.), Clinical linguistics. Theory and applications in speech pathology and therapy (pp. 175-195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E., & Namazi, M.
(2007) Specific Language Impairment in French-speaking children: Beyond grammatical morphology. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 698-715 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Lely, H.
(1998) SLI in children: Movement, economy and deficits in the computational-syntactic system. Language Acquisition, 7, 161-192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Understanding Second Language Processing [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 4], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.