Article published in:Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages
Edited by Jörg-U. Keßler, Anke Lenzing and Mathias Liebner
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 5] 2016
► pp. 135–162
Psychometric approaches to language testing and linguistic profiling – A complementary relationship?
The present study investigates as to whether and to what extent Linguistic Profiling can complement shortcomings of proficiency rating scales that are based on the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) (CoE 2001). In order to shed light on possible interfaces between the second language acquisition theory Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann 1998, 2005) and the CEFR, learners were rated according to the CEFR and diagnosed with two linguistic profiling tools: Rapid Profile (Mackey, Pienemann, & Thornton 1991; Pienemann & Mackey 1993; Keßler 2006, 2008) and Autoprofile (Lin 2012). The emergence criterion (Pienemann 1998; Pallotti 2007) as used in PT as the starting point to determine acquisition is highly predictive in nature and thus taken as the point of departure of an integration of PT into the CEFR. The results show correspondences between CEFR levels and PT stages and suggest a reexamination of early CEFR levels in terms of the complexity of operations beginning learners are assumed to manage.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Published online: 29 June 2016
Bachman L., & Cohen, A.D.
Council of Europe
(2012) Illustrations of the European levels of language proficiency. Accessed on 15 December 2012 from: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Manuel1_EN.asp#P81_6526
Crystal, D., Fletcher, P., & Garman, M.
DiBiase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
Håkansson, G., Salameh, E.K., & Nettelbladt, U.
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C.
Kaplan, R.M., & Saccuzzo, D.P.
Kawaguchi, S., DiBiase, B., & Pienemann, M.
Keßler, J.-U., & Plesser, A.
Lenzing A., & Plesser, A.
(2010) Challenging the scope-precision dilemma in language testing: The common European framework and linguistic profiling. Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium of Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition (PALA). University of Western Sydney, Australia, 19-21 September.
(2008) The Common European Framework of Reference for languages and the development of policies for the integration of adult migrants. Council of Europe: Strasbourg. Accessed on 20 February 2013 from: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Little_CEFRmigrants_EN.doc
Mackey, A., Pienemann, M., & Thornton, I.
Meisel, J.M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(2007) The Common European Framework of Reference: Development, theoretical and practical issues . Accessed on 14 August 2014 from: http://www.nationaalcongresengels.nl/cgi-bin/North-Ede-Wagingen%202007-paper.pdf
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G.
Pienemann, M., & Mackey, A.
(1993) An empirical study of children’s ESL development and Rapid Profile. In P. McKay (Ed.), ESL development: Language and literacy in schools, Vol. 2: Documents on bandscale development and language acquisition (pp. 115–259). Canberra: National Languages & Literacy Institute of Australia and Commonwealth of Australia.
Pienemann, M., DiBiase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U.
Pienemann, M., Lin, B-J., & Chung, L.-Y.
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U.
(2007) Verbal qualifiers for rating scales: Sociolinguistic considerations and psychometric data. University of Melbourne, Australia. Accessed on 14 August 2014 from: http://www.rohrmannresearch.net/pdfs/rohrmann-vqs-report.pdf