Part of
Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second LanguagesEdited by Jörg-U. Keßler, Anke Lenzing and Mathias Liebner
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 5] 2016
► pp. 193–206
Edited by Jörg-U. Keßler, Anke Lenzing and Mathias Liebner
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 5] 2016
► pp. 193–206
Diagnosing L2-English in the communicative EFL Classroom
A task-based approach to individual and developmentally moderated focus on form in a meaning-focused setting
In this paper, we outline a solution to the problem that teachers for students in heterogeneous EFL classrooms need to provide lessons that enable language acquisition at different levels (here: stages of the PT Hierarchy). Therefore, we describe a learner- and learning-centred application of Processability Theory (henceforth PT; Pienemann 1998 and 2005) which covers a teaching unit that combines a communicative teaching approach with Second Language Acquisition diagnosis in order to foster L2 acquisition of individual learners in heterogeneous EFL classrooms. The focus here will be on how teachers can cope with heterogeneity in the classroom by offering suitable teaching units. We show how a combination of Task-based Language Teaching (e.g. Ellis 2003; Eckerth & Siepmann 2008) and PT provide the necessary theoretical framework for this teaching unit. Furthermore, Rapid Profile and the Diagnostic Task Cycle (Keßler 2008) are used within this overall framework for the teaching unit presented in this paper. This diagnostic approach should be seen as conceptual since it can be applied to various classroom settings. In the example presented here, students read a novel suitable for teenagers and produce Podcasts and thereby record natural communication in the classroom. This learner output delivers precise knowledge about second language development of each learner in a classroom. On this basis, the teacher can offer developmentally moderated treatment (e.g. Keßler 2008) and developmentally moderated focus on form (Di Biase 2008) to individual learners in heterogeneous EFL classrooms.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (30)
Cook, V. (1996). Second language learning and second language teaching. London: Arnold.
DiBiase, B. (2008). Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Duncan, L. (1978). Killing Mr. Griffin. Easy reader. Britt Keson (Ed.). (2005). Egmont: Aschehough & Alinea.
Eckerth, J. (2008). Task-based language learning and teaching – old wine in new bottles? In Eckerth & Siepmann (Eds.), pp. 13-46.
Eckerth, J., & Siepmann, S. (Eds.). (2008). Research on task-based language learning and teaching. Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical perspectives. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gil, G. (2002). Two complementary modes of foreign language classroom interaction. EFL Journal, 56(3), 273-279.
Grießhaber, W. (2005). Sprachstandsdiagnose im Zweitspracherwerb: Funktional-pragmatische Fundierung der Profilanalyse. Accessed on 6 March 2009 from: <[URL]>
Keßler, J.-U. (2005). Fachdidaktik meets Psycholinguistik – Heterogenität im Englischunterricht erkennen, verstehen und als Chance nutzen, In K. Bräu & U. Schwerdt (Eds.), Heterogenität als Chance. Vom Umgang mit Gleichheit und Differenz in der Schule (pp. 263-284). Münster: LIT; S.
. (2006). Englischerwerb im Anfangsunterricht diagnostizieren. Linguistische Profilanalysen am Übergang von der Primarstufe in die Sekundarstufe I. Tübingen: Narr.
. (2008). Communicative tasks and second language profiling: Linguistic and pedagogical implications. In Eckerth & Siepmann (Eds.), pp. 291-310.
. (2009). Englischdidaktik in ‚Erklärungsnot’: Implizites und explizites Wissen und die Rolle der Bewusstmachung im schulischen Englischerwerb. In R. Vogt (Eds.), Erklären: Gesprächsanalytische und fachdidaktische Perspektiven (pp. 93-107). Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
Keßler, J.-U., & Keatinge, D. (2008). Profiling oral second language development. In J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 167-197). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Keßler, J.-U., & Kohli, V.J. (2006). Erhebung von Sprachprofilen im frühen Englischerwerb: Kommunikative Tasks in Forschung und Fremdsprachenunterricht. In M. Pienemann, J.-U. Keßler, & E. Roos (Eds.), Englischerwerb in der Grundschule. Ein Studien- und Arbeitsbuch (pp. 89-96). Paderborn: Schöningh/UTB.
Keßler, J.-U., & Liebner, M. (2011). Diagnosing L2 development: Rapid Profile. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theo6ry. An introductory textbook (pp. 133-147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
. (2012). Medienbasierte Lernstandsdiagnostik und individuelle Lernerförderung – Neokommunikativer Fremdsprachenunterricht in heterogenen Lerngruppen. In M. Reinfried & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Medien im neokommunikativen Fremdsprachenunterricht. Einsatzformen, Inhalte, Lernerkompetenzen (pp. 303-317). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Keßler, J.-U., & Plesser, A. (2011). Teaching grammar. Paderborn: Schöning/UTB.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, M.H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker-von-Ditfurth, M. (2011). Teaching English: Task-supported language learning. Paderborn: Schöningh/UTB.
Pienemann, M. (1992). Assessing second language acquisition through Rapid Profile. Ms. Sydney.
. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2006). Spracherwerb in der Schule. Was in den Köpfen der Kinder vorgeht. In M. Pienemann, J.-U. Keßler, & E. Roos (Eds.), Englischerwerb in der Grundschule. Ein Studien- und Arbeitsbuch (pp. 33-63). Paderborn: Schöningh/UTB.
. (2011). The psycholinguistic basis of PT. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory. An introductory textbook (pp. 27-49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U. (2007). Measuring bilingualism. In P. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics, Vol. 5: Multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 247-275). Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter.
. (2012). Processability Theory, In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 228-247). New York, NY: Routledge.
Pienemann, M., Keßler, J.-U., & Liebner, M. (2006). Englischerwerb in der Grundschule: Untersuchungsergebnisse im Überblick. In M. Pienemann, J.-U. Keßler, & E. Roos (Eds.), Englischerwerb in der Grundschule. Ein Studien- und Arbeitsbuch (pp. 67-88). Paderborn: Schöningh/UTB.
Seedhouse, P. (1997). Combining form and meaning. ELT Journal, 5(14), 336-344.
Vollmer, H.J. (2008). Constructing tasks for content and language integrated learning and assessment. In Eckerth & Siepmann (Eds.), (pp. 227-290).
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Kawaguchi, Satomi
2023. Chapter 2. Studies of Japanese as a second language and their contribution to Processability Theory. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 27 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.