Cover not available
Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 51–70

Chapter 3
Morpho-syntactic development in the input

A study of second language learning textbooks

| Lund University

This article reports on a study of textbooks used in “Education in Swedish for Immigrants”, in which morpho-syntactic progression is examined in terms of frequency of occurrence in the textual input and is related to learners’ development as defined by Processability Theory (Pienemann 1998). The study is one of two parts of a research project that aims to relate second language instruction through textbooks to research on morpho-syntactic development. The first part was concerned with order of introduction in the learning objectives (Flyman Mattsson 2016), and the second part will be presented in this article. The present study confirms that there is a lack of consensus in the definition of morpho-syntactic progression. If the texts do not represent the learners’ level of development, this may slow down or inhibit progress.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.PT
  • 4.Teachability hypothesis
  • 5.Representation in the input
  • 6.Previous research on textbooks
  • 7.A study of learning objectives in textbooks for “Education in Swedish for Immigrants”
    • 7.1Aim of the study
  • 8.Data and method for analysis
    • 8.1“Education in Swedish for Immigrants”
    • 8.2Method of analysis
  • 9.Results
    • 9.1Progression between courses
    • 9.2Morpho-syntactic difficulties within single texts
  • 10.Discussion
  • References
  • Textbooks in the study
Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.6.03mat
References
Andringa, S. & Rebuschat, P.
2015 New directions in the study of implicit and explicit learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37(2): 185–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
1973 A First Language: The Early Stages. London: George Allen & Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Language, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, R.
2003 Implicit and Explicit Learning. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B.
2002 Focusing strategies in second language development: A classroom-based study of Italian L2 in primary school. In Developing a Second Language: Acquisition, Processing and Pedagogy Issues in Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, and Swedish, B. Di Biase (ed.), 95–120. Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J.
2003 Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J. & Williams, J.
1998 Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 197–262. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. & Burt, M.
1974 Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24(1): 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eklund-Heinonen, M.
2009 Processbarhet på prov: Bedömning av muntlig språkfärdighet hos vuxna andraspråksinlärare (Processability in Tests: Assessment of Oral Proficiency in Adult Second Language Learners). PhD dissertation, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.
2002 Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. & Brook O’Donnell, M.
2012 Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition, P. Rebuschat & J. N. Williams (eds), 265–304. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. & Larsen Freeman, D.
2006 Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics (introduction to the special issue). Applied Linguistics 27(4): 558–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2008 Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1): 4–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. & Shintani, N.
2014 Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flyman Mattsson, A.
2016 Att lära ut vad inlärare kan lära in: om grammatisk utveckling hos andraspråksinlärare [To teach what learners can learn: second language learners’ grammatical development] In Flerspråkighet som resurs (Multilingualism as a Resource), B. Kindenberg (ed.), 67–79. Nationellt centrum för svenska som andraspråk, Symposium 15.Google Scholar
Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A. & Lund, K.
2001 Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(3): 389–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M. & DeKeyser, R. M.
2001 Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition; in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51(1): 1–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I.
2012 Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency. Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA [Language Learning & Language Teaching 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
2011 Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly 8(3): 229–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be? Language Learning 65(1): 210–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G.
1987 Teacher Talk. How Teachers Modify Their Speech When Addressing Learners of Swedish as a Second Language. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
2000 Svenska som förstaspråk och som andraspråk. Likheter och skillnader [Swedish as a first and a second language. Similarities and differences]. In Svenskan i tiden – verklighet och visioner [Swedish in time – reality and visions], H. Åhl (ed.), 138–154. Stockholm: HLS förlag.Google Scholar
Kawaguchi, S.
2005 Processability Theory and Japanese as a second language. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language 8: 83–114.Google Scholar
Kessler, J.-U. & Keatinge, D.
2008 Profiling oral second language development. In Processability Approaches to Second Language Development and Second Language Learning, J.-U. Kessler (ed.), 165–197. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Kessler, J.-U., Liebner, M. & Mansouri, F.
2011 Teaching. In Studying Processability Theory: An Introductory Textbook [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 1], M. Pienemann & J.-U. Kessler (eds), 149–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Language Learning
65(1) 2015 Special Issue: Orders and Sequences in the Acquisition of L2 Morphosyntax, 40 Years On.Google Scholar
Lenzing, A.
2008 Teachability and learnability: An analysis of primary school textbooks. In Processability Approaches to Second Language Development and Second Language Learning, J.-U. Kessler (ed.), 221–245. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Lindberg, I. & Johansson Kokkinakis, S.
(eds) 2007 OrdiL – En korpusbaserad kartläggning av ordförrådet i läromedel för grundskolans senare år [OrdiL – A corpus based mapping of the vocabulary in textbooks for elementary school] Rapporter om svenska som andraspråk 8 [Reports on Swedish as a second language 8]. Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Mansouri, F. & Duffy, L.
2005 The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28(1): 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, C. & Håkansson, G.
2007 The interaction of complexity and grammatical processability – The case of Swedish as a foreign language. IRAL 45(1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L.
2000 Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3): 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1985 Learnability and syllabus construction. In Modeling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition, K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds), 23–76. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1989 Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1): 217–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2005 Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 30]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Håkansson, G.
1999 A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(3): 383–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Kessler, J.-U.
2012 Processability Theory. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (eds), 228–246. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Lenzing, A.
2015 Processability Theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (2nd ed.), B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds). New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reichenberg, M.
2000 Röst och kausalitet i lärobokstexter. En studie av elevers förståelse av olika textversioner (Voice and Causality in Textbooks. A Study of Students’ Comprehension of Different Versions of Swedish Texts). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis Göteborg Studies in Educational Science 149.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
2001 Attention. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, P. Robinson (ed.), 3–32. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schönström, K.
2010 Tvåspråkighet hos döva skolelever. Processbarhet i svenska och narrativ struktur i svenska och svenskt teckenspråk (Bilingualism in School-aged Deaf Pupils: Processability in Swedish and Narrative Structure in Swedish and Swedish Sign Language). PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Skolverket
2012 Utbildning i svenska för invandrare – Kursplaner och kommentarer (Education in Swedish for Immigrants – Curricula and Comments).Google Scholar
Wang, X.
2011 Grammatical Development among Chinese L2 Learners: From a Processability Account. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. & Lantolf, J. P.
2015 Natural or artificial: Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning 65(1): 152–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.
2001 Second Language Acquisition of Chinese Grammatical Morphemes: A Processability Perspective. PhD dissertation, Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
2005 Processing and formal instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. In Pienemann (ed.), 155–177.Google Scholar
Zipser, K.
2012 Processability theory and pedagogical progression in an Italian textbook. Linguistica 52(1): 55–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Textbooks in the study

Brusewitz, T. & Renlund, B.
2008 Framåt B. [Forward B] Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
2009 Framåt C. [Forward C] Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
Ekblad, U. & Söderqvist, C.
2012 Språkvägen – för sfi kurs B. (Language road – sfi course B). Stockholm: Sanoma Utbildning.Google Scholar
2013 Språkvägen – för sfi kurs C. (Language road – sfi course C). Stockholm: Sanoma Utbildning.Google Scholar
Latvala, I.
2012 Fantastiska texter från hela världen (Fantastic texts from the whole world). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Levy Scherrer, P. & Lindemalm, K.
2007 Rivstart A1+ A2 (Flying start A1 + A2). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
McShane, M.
2007 Svenska till max. Nybörjarbok (Swedish to the max. Beginners). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
2007 Svenska till max. Textbok 1 (Swedish to the max. Textbook 1). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
2010 Svenska till max. Textbok 2 (Swedish to the max. Textbook 2). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
Mörling, M.
2008 Framåt A. (Forward A). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
Svensson, M.
2012 Extra! Läs- och skrivövningar för sfi kurs B. (Extra! reading and writing exercises sfi course B). Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.Google Scholar
Tarras, L. & Stiernstedt, M.
2008 Samspråk 1. Om livet i Sverige (Conversing 1. About life in Sweden). Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Tarras, L. & Bernhardtson, E.
2008 Samspråk 2. Om livet i Sverige (Conversing 2. About life in Sweden). Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Wikner, S. & Wikner, J.
2012 Svenska – och mycket mer/ABC. Alfabetisering (Swedish – and a lot more/ABC. Literacy). Wikners förlag.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Keßler, Jörg‐U. & Anke Lenzing
2022. Grammar in Foreign and Second Language Classes. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.