Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 7193
References
Bettoni, C. & Di Biase, B.
(eds) 2015Grammatical Development in Second Languages: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory [EUROSLA Monographs Series 3]. Paris: Eurosla.Google Scholar
Bonilla, C.
2015Instructing stages of processability theory in L2 Spanish: Next or next + 1? In Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4], K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman & M. Van Herreweghe (eds), 205–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boss, B.
1996German grammar for beginners – the Teachability Hypothesis and its relevance to the classroom. In Who’s Afraid of Teaching Grammar – Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, C. Arbonés Solá, J. Rolin-Ianziti & R. Sussex (eds), 1: 93–103.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., Asudeh, A., Toivonen, I. & Wechsler, S.
2015Lexical-Functional Syntax. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H.
1984The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to second language acquisition. In Second Languages, R. Andersen (ed.), 143–186. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S.
2002Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research 18: 274–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, B.
1996A teacher’s perspective on form-focused instruction. Australian Studies in Language Acquisition 3: 1–15.Google Scholar
2008What we can learn from questions: Question development and its implications for language development. Prospect 23: 16–27.Google Scholar
2009Processability Theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research 25: 355–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Are pathway students prepared for effective university preparation? A case student of an international student cohort. Journal of Academic Language and Learning 8: 28–42.Google Scholar
Dyson, B. & Håkansson, G.
2017Understanding Second Language Processing: A Focus on Processability Theory [Bilingual Processing & Acquisition 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
1989Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of the German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 303–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G.
2009Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Farley, A. & McCollum, K.
2004Learner readiness and L2 production in Spanish: Processability Theory on trial. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada 40: 47–69.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G. & Norrby, C.
2007Processability Theory applied to written and oral L2 Swedish. In Second Language Acquisition Research: Theory-construction and Testing, F. Mansouri (ed.), 81–94. Newcaste upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2010Environmental influence on language acquisition: comparing Second and Foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning 60: 628–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keßler, J.-U., Liebner, M. & Mansouri, F.
2011Teaching. In Studying Processability Theory: An Introductory Textbook [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 1], M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (eds), 149–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Philp, J.
1998Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings. The Modern Language Journal 82: 338–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, F. & Duffy, L.
2005The pedagogical effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28: 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, F. & Håkansson, G.
2007Conceptualising intra-stage sequencing in the learner language. In Second Language Acquisition Research: Theory-construction and Testing, F. Mansouri (ed.), 119–145. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M.
1981On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3: 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1984Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6: 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10: 53–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Language processing capacity. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds), 679–714. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2005Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 30]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015An outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning 65: 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S.
2005Extending Processability Theory. In Pienemann (ed.), 199–252.Google Scholar
Sakai, H.
2008An analysis of Japanese university students’ oral performance in English using Processability Theory. System 36: 534–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.
1999Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in Second Language Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 83: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. & Lantoff, J. P.
2015Natural or artificial? Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning 65: 152–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H.
1985Markedness and the projection problem. Language Learning 33: 293–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Dyson, Bronwen, Gisela Håkansson & Kirrie J. Ballard
2022. A Developmental Approach to Assessing and Treating Agrammatic Aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 31:3  pp. 1188 ff. DOI logo
Keßler, Jörg‐U. & Anke Lenzing
2022. Grammar in Foreign and Second Language Classes. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.