Chapter published in:
Widening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
Edited by Anke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas and Jana Roos
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 7] 2019
► pp. 4972
References
Bonilla, C
(2015) From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research 31(1), 53–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2009) Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4), 977–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buyl, A., & Housen, A.
(2015) Developmental stages in receptive grammar acquisition: A Processability Theory account. Second Language Research 31(4), 523–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Hong, U.
(1995) Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: New evidence from reaction-time experiments. Second Language Research 11, 57–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2002) Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research 18(3), 274–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y.
(2015) The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp. 85–116). Paris: European Second Language Association.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2008) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hatch, E., & Farhady, H.
(1982) Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
(2015) Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be? Language Learning 65(1), 210–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D.
(1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of experimental psychology: General 111(2), 228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keatinge, D., & Keßler, J-U.
(2009) The acquisition of the passive voice in English as a foreign language: Production and perception. In D. Keatinge & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across languages (pp. 41–68). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Keating, G., & Jegerski, J.
(2015) Experimental designs in sentence processing research: A methodological review and user’s guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37(1), 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2), 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) An introduction to Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross–linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 1–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(2009) A brief introduction to Processability Theory. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 9–29). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Keßler, J.-U., & Itani-Adams, Y.
(2011) Comparing levels of processability across languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 15(2), 128–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J.
(2002) Implicational scales. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 142–167). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sakai, H
(2008) An analysis of Japanese university students’ oral performance in English using Processability Theory. System 36, 534–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spinner, P
(2011) Second language assessment and morphosyntactic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(4), 529–561. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Language production and reception: A Processability Theory study. Language Learning 63(4), 704–739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spinner, P., & Jung, S.
2018). Production and comprehension in Processability Theory: A self-paced reading study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 40 (2), 295-318. Crossref
VanPatten, B., & Smith, M.
(2015) Aptitude as grammatical sensitivity and the initial stages of learning Japanese as an L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37(1), 135–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar