Cover not available
Part of
Widening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
Edited by Anke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas and Jana Roos
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 7] 2019
► pp. 185–206

Chapter 8
Processability Theory as a tool in the study of a heritage speaker of Norwegian

In this article, we employ aspects of Processability Theory (PT) to study the language of one fourth generation heritage speaker of Norwegian in America. This man, who we refer to as Lars, was almost 50 years old when we first met and recorded him in 2010, and to our knowledge he is among the youngest Norwegian-Americans still able to speak Norwegian as a heritage language in the Upper Midwest. His dominant language was Norwegian until he started school, when English took over this role. When we met him the first time, he had not spoken Norwegian to any substantial extent for several decades.
When we examine his language, we find a number of grammatical deviations from the baseline – the language as spoken in the old world, and we discuss the possible explanations for these; are they related to the quality of the input, are they due to attrition or are they the result of incomplete acquisition? In the discussion, we include certain aspects of PT, and based on this, we claim that attrition is the most likely explanation for the reduced structures in Lars’ Norwegian.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The speaker and the community
  • 3.Lars’ language
  • 4.The input
  • 5.Lars’ language and PT stages
    • 5.1Stage 2: Inflection
    • 5.2Stage 3: Phrasal information exchange
    • 5.3Stage 4: Interphrasal information exchange
    • 5.4Stage 5: Distinguishing main and subordinate clauses
  • 6.Language attrition or incomplete acquisition: Discussion and conclusion
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.7.08hje
References (27)
References
Eide, K. M., & Sollid, H. (2011). Norwegian main clause declaratives: variation within and across grammars. In P. Siemund (Ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation (pp. 327–360). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, K. (2012). Om tempus og aspekt i norsk [On tense and aspect in Norwegian]. In H. O. Enger, J. T. Faarlund, & K. I. Vannebo (Eds.), Grammatikk, bruk og norm. Festskrift til Svein Lie på 70-årsdagen (pp. 57–78). Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Eide, K. M., & Hjelde, A. (2015). Verb second and finiteness morphology in Norwegian heritage language of the American midwest. In B. R. Page & M. T. Putnam (Eds.), Moribund Germanic heritage languages in North America: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings (pp. 64–101). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, J. T., Lie, S., & Vannebo, K. I. (1997). Norsk referansegrammatikk [Norwegian reference grammar]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A., & Lund, K. (2001). Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 389–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1953). The Norwegian language in America: A study in bilingual behavior. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelde, A. (1992). Trøndsk talemål i Amerika[The Trøndsk dialect in America]. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
(2015). Changes in a Norwegian dialect in America. In J. B. Johannessen & J. C. Salmons (Eds.), Germanic heritage languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change (pp. 283–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G. (2001). Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4, 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Flyman Mattsson, A. (2010). Bedömning av svenska som andraspråk [Assessment of Swedish as second language]. Uppsala: Studentlitteratur AB.Google Scholar
Ibarra, R. A. (1976). Ethnicity genuine and spurious: A study of a Norwegian community in rural Wisconsin (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Itani-Adams, Y. (2011). Bilingual first language acquisition. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Kessler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory (pp. 121–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. (2015). Attrition in an American Norwegian heritage language speaker. In J. B. Johannessen & J. C. Salmons (Eds.), Germanic heritage languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change (pp. 46–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J. B., & Salmons, J. C. (2015). The study of Germanic heritage languages in the Americas. In J. B. Johannessen & J. C. Salmons (Eds.), Germanic heritage languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J. B., & Larsson, I. (2015). Complexity matters: On gender agreement in heritage Scandinavian. Frontiers in Psychology 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julien, M. (2010). Embedded clauses with main clause word order in Mainland Scandinavian. Published on LingBuzz. < [URL] >
Lohndal, T., & Westergaard, M. (2016). Grammatical gender in American Norwegian heritage language: Stability or attrition? Frontiers in Psychology 7(344).
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Google Scholar
Lynch, A. (2003). The relationship between second and heritage language acquisition: Notes on research and theory building. Heritage Language Journal 1(1), 26–34.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2012). Is the heritage language like a second language? Eurosla Yearbook 12, 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2013). Bilingualism and the heritage language speaker. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 168–189). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Munch, P. A. (1949). Social adjustment among Wisconsin Norwegians. American Sociological Review 14(6), (Dec. 1949), 780–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (2009). Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 211–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Søfteland, Å. (2014). Utbrytingskonstruksjonen i norsk spontantale [Clefts in Norwegian spoken language] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Westergaard, M. (2009). Acquisition of word order: Microcues, information structure, and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kawaguchi, Satomi
2023. Chapter 2. Studies of Japanese as a second language and their contribution to Processability Theory. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Kawaguchi, Satomi, Bruno Di Biase & Yumiko Yamaguchi
2023. Chapter 1. Processability Theory, second language learning and teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.