Chapter published in:
Widening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
Edited by Anke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas and Jana Roos
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 7] 2019
► pp. 391–398

How does PT’s view of acquisition relate to the challenge of widening perspectives on SLA?

Published online: 28 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.7.17nic
References

References

Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B.
(2015) Processability Theory: Theoretical bases and universal schedules. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp. 19–79). Paris: The European Second Language Acquisition Association.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
(2015) Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be? Language Learning 65(1), 210–232. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2), 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H.
(1984) ‘To be’ or not ‘to be’, is that really the question? Developmental sequences and the role of the copula in the acquisition of German as a second language. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 299–317). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., & Starks, D.
(2014) Language education and applied linguistics: Bridging the two fields. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 186–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(Ed.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar