Chapter 17
How does PT’s view of acquisition relate to the challenge of widening perspectives on
SLA?
Article outline
- PT and emergence
- PT and the data underpinning the emergence criterion
- Emergence and mastery
- Emergence is embedded in other processes
- What does acquisition look like for variational features?
- Where to now?
-
References
References
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B.
(
2015)
Processability Theory: Theoretical bases and universal
schedules. In
C. Bettoni &
B. Di Biase (Eds.),
Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of
Processability Theory (pp. 19–79). Paris: The European Second Language Acquisition Association.

Hulstijn, J. H.
(
2015)
Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development
be? Language Learning 65(1), 210–232.


Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(
1981)
On determining developmental stages in natural second language
acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2), 109–135.


Nicholas, H.
(
1984)
‘To be’ or not ‘to be’, is that really the question? Developmental sequences
and the role of the copula in the acquisition of German as a second
language. In
R. Andersen (Ed.),
Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 299–317). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Nicholas, H., & Starks, D.
(
2014)
Language education and applied linguistics: Bridging the two fields. London: Routledge.


Pienemann, M.
(
1984)
Psychological constraints on the teachability of language.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 186–214.


Pienemann, M
(
1989)
Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and
hypotheses.
Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52–79.


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Pienemann, Manfred, Frank Lanze, Howard Nicholas & Anke Lenzing
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.