‘Well’ in Dialogue Games
A discourse analysis of the interjection ‘well’ in idealized conversation
This dialogue game approach to the discourse analysis of the English interjection well aims at the formulation of rules which would be informative (marking some contexts of use as more natural than others), systematic (applicable in a mechanical or at least in a non-ad hoc way), and adequate (showing putative competitors to be either false to fact, too narrow or too wide, or demonstrably equivalent).
[Pragmatics & Beyond, V:5] 1984. ix, 104 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
ix
|
|
1. Introduction
|
1
|
|
1.1. Aims
|
1
|
|
1.2. Idealizations
|
2
|
|
1.3. Chapter outlines
|
3
|
|
2. Theory
|
5
|
|
2.1. Dialogue games
|
5
|
|
2.2. Conversational analysis
|
9
|
|
2.3. Computational models of dialogue
|
12
|
|
3. Earlier Treatments of Well
|
17
|
|
3.1. Lakoff (1973a)
|
17
|
|
3.2. Murray (1979)
|
19
|
|
3.3. Svartvik (1980)
|
21
|
|
3.4. Owen (1981)
|
22
|
|
4. The Present Treatment
|
27
|
|
4.1. The hypothesis
|
27
|
|
4.2. Development of the hypothesis
|
29
|
|
4.3. Data and classification
|
32
|
|
5. Well as a Qualifier
|
35
|
|
5.1. Question-answer exchanges
|
35
|
|
5.2. Other exchanges
|
40
|
|
6. Well as a Frame
|
53
|
|
6.1. Opening a dialogue
|
53
|
|
6.2. Transition situations
|
55
|
|
6.3. Closing
|
61
|
|
6.4. Turn internal cases
|
63
|
|
7. Contrastive Studies
|
67
|
|
7.1. Well vs. oh
|
68
|
|
7.2. Well and Finnish no
|
76
|
|
7.3. Schourup (1983)
|
81
|
|
8. Extensions
|
91
|
|
8.1. Politeness
|
91
|
|
8.2. Emotions
|
92
|
|
8.3. Well in writing
|
94
|
|
Footnotes
|
95
|
|
Sources of Examples
|
99
|
|
References
|
101
|
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Aijmer, Karin
2015.
In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability,
► pp. 201 ff. 
Aijmer, Karin
2021. “That’s well good”: A Re-emergent Intensifier in Current British English.
Journal of English Linguistics 49:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2003. The discourse particle well and its equivalents in Swedish and Dutch.
Linguistics 41:6
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2009.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Alcón-Soler, Eva & Deborah Tricker
2021. The use of ‘well’ in spoken interaction.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics ► pp. 119 ff.
Arminen, Ilkka & Minna Leinonen
2006. Mobile phone call openings: tailoring answers to personalized summonses.
Discourse Studies 8:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
Defour, Tine & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2010. “Positive Appraisal” as a Core Meaning ofwell: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Middle and Early Modern English Data.
English Studies 91:6 ► pp. 643 ff.
Fleckenstein, Kristen
2021.
Well-prefaced constructed dialogue as a marker of stance in online abortion discourse.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Heritage, John
2018.
In Between Turn and Sequence [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 31],
► pp. 155 ff.
Huang, Lan-fen
2019. A Corpus-Based Exploration of the Discourse Marker Well in Spoken Interlanguage.
Language and Speech 62:3 ► pp. 570 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
1997. The discourse markerwellin the history of English.
English Language and Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 91 ff.
Klein, Marion
1999.
In Text, Speech and Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1692],
► pp. 274 ff.
Lam, Phoenix W. Y.
2010. Discourse Particles in Corpus Data and Textbooks: The Case of Well.
Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Marcus, Nicole E.
2009. Continuous Semantic Development of the Discourse MarkerWell.
English Studies 90:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Oishi, Etsuko
2020. Discourse markers as indicators of connectedness between expositive illocutionary acts.
Pragmatics and Society 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Oishi, Etsuko
2021.
In Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 27],
► pp. 63 ff.
O’Neill, Barry
1991.
In Game Equilibrium Models IV,
► pp. 124 ff.
Palma-Fahey, María
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 348 ff.
van Elswyk, Peter
2020. Deceiving without answering.
Philosophical Studies 177:5 ► pp. 1157 ff.
Álvarez González, Albert
2021.
In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219],
► pp. 314 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General