28. The pragmatics of indirect anaphors

Cited by 24 other publications

Blackwell, Sarah E.

2018. Frames of Reference and Antecedentless Anaphora in Spanish Conversation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:2 ► pp. 283 ff.

Cornish, Francis

2020. Les données en linguistique : choix, nature et exploitation. Une vue personnelle. Travaux de linguistique n° 79:2 ► pp. 7 ff.

Cornish, Francis, Alan Garnham, H. Wind Cowles, Marion Fossard & Virginie André

2005. Indirect anaphora in English and French: A cross-linguistic study of pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 52:3 ► pp. 363 ff.

Duque, Eladio

2014. Signaling causal coherence relations. Discourse Studies 16:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

EPSTEIN, RICHARD

2011. The distal demonstrative as discourse marker inBeowulf. English Language and Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 113 ff.

Gelbukh, A., G. Sidorov & I.A. Bolshakov

2000.  In Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, ► pp. 96 ff.

Gelbukh, Alexander, Grigori Sidorov & Igor A. Bolshakov

2000.  In Text, Speech and Dialogue [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1902], ► pp. 357 ff.

Gerrig, Richard J., William S. Horton & Amanda Stent

2011. Production and Comprehension of Unheralded Pronouns: A Corpus Analysis. Discourse Processes 48:3 ► pp. 161 ff.

Guillot-Barbance, Céline & Christiane Marchello-Nizia

2015. Spécialisation morpho-syntaxique et changement sémantique : le cas du démonstratif français. Langue française N° 187:3 ► pp. 79 ff.

Hawkins, John A.

1991. On (in)definite articles: implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 405 ff.

Horn, Christian & Nicolas Kimm

2014.  In Frames and Concept Types [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 94], ► pp. 343 ff.

Hou, Yufang, Katja Markert & Michael Strube

2018. Unrestricted Bridging Resolution. Computational Linguistics 44:2 ► pp. 237 ff.

Järvikivi, Juhani, Sarah Schimke & Pirita Pyykkönen-Klauck

2019. Understanding Indirect Reference in a Visual Context. Discourse Processes 56:2 ► pp. 117 ff.

Kimm, Nicolas & Christian Horn

2011.  In Anaphora Processing and Applications [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7099], ► pp. 108 ff.

Kocsány, Piroska

2018. A közelre mutatóeznévmás anaforikus kifejtő szerkezetekben és a diszkurzív kontinuitás fokozatai. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 5:1 ► pp. 117 ff.

Laury, Ritva

2001.  In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Laury, Ritva

2022. Definiteness and reflexivity. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 401 ff.

Matsui, Tomoko

1999.  In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1688], ► pp. 228 ff.

Meeuwis, Michael & Koen Stroeken

2022. Non-situational functions of demonstrative noun phrases in Lingala (Bantu). Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 147 ff.

NIKOLAEVA, IRINA

2001. Secondary topic as a relation in information structure. Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Perdicoyanni-Paléologou, Hélène

2009. Le concept d’anaphore, de cataphore et de déixis en linguistique française. Revue québécoise de linguistique 29:2 ► pp. 55 ff.

Salles, Mathilde

2021. Anaphore associative et absence d’antécédent ou lorsqu’un conducteur roule en anaphore associative sans son véhicule. Travaux de linguistique n° 81:2 ► pp. 7 ff.

Sanford, Anthony J. & Ruth Filik

2007. “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60:2 ► pp. 171 ff.

Sanford, Anthony J., Ruth Filik, Catherine Emmott & Lorna Morrow

2008. Short Article: They're Digging up the Road Again: The Processing Cost of Institutional They. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61:3 ► pp. 372 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.