Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760)

A sociopragmatic analysis

HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027253781 (Eur) | EUR 125.00
ISBN 9781588116369 (USA) | USD 188.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027294432 | EUR 125.00 | USD 188.00
 
Google Play logo
This book belongs to the rapidly growing field of historical pragmatics. More specifically, it aims to lend definition to the area of historical sociopragmatics. It seeks to enhance our understanding of the language of the historical courtroom by documenting changes to the discursive roles of the most active participant groups of the English courtroom (e.g. the judges, lawyers, witnesses and defendants) in the period 1640–1760. Although the primary focus is on questions and answers, this book also analyses the use of eliciting and non-eliciting devices (e.g. requests and commands) as a means of demonstrating similarities and differences over time. Particular strengths of this work include the study of different types of trial, making the results potentially more representative of the courtroom in general, and the innovative discourse analytic approach, which blends corpus methodology and sociopragmatic analysis, thereby enabling the quantitative analysis of functional phenomena.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 135] 2005.  xiv, 374 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“Archer's book can be a very useful one, for those interested in historical linguistics and for those with a background and interest in the history of law.”
Cited by

Cited by 46 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2020. Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode. Social Semiotics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Archer, Dawn
2014. Historical Pragmatics: Evidence From The Old Bailey. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:2  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
2017. Context and historical (socio-)pragmatics twenty years on. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
2018. Impression management in the Early Modern English courtroom. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Bergstrom, Tracy, Donald Brower & Natalie Meyers
2014. IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries,  pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
2022. Constraint factors in the formulation of questions in conflictual discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Boginskaya, Olga
2022. Dissenting with conviction: boosting in challenging the majority opinion. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7:2  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2011. In Pursuit of an Expert Identity: A Case Study of Experts in the Historical Courtroom. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 24:4  pp. 471 ff. DOI logo
2012. Performing self on the witness stand: Stance and relational work in expert witness testimony. Discourse & Society 23:5  pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
2018. Dialogic features and interpersonal management in the early courtroom action game. Language and Dialogue 8:3  pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Chovanec, Jan
2014. “…but there were no broken legs”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15:2  pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Claridge, Claudia
2019. Chapter 11. Drinking and crime. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan
2022. Affirmatives in Early Modern English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski & Abe Sweiry
2022. Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
De Felice, Rachele
2013. A Corpus-Based Classification of Commitments in Business English. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1],  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Fanego, Teresa & Paula Rodríguez-Puente
2019. Chapter 1. “Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer?” English legal discourse past and present. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fanego, Teresa, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, Cristina Blanco-García & Iván Tamaredo
2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41:1  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Guo, Hui & Yaxin Wu
2021. Inference-embedded yes/no interrogatives in Mandarin Chinese conversation. East Asian Pragmatics 6:2 DOI logo
Johnson, Alison J.
2018. Chapter 2. “How came you not to cry out?”. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288],  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Jucker, Andreas H. & Joanna Kopaczyk
2017. Historical (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen
2014. Diachronic corpus pragmatics: Intersections and interactions. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena
2012. “I am a Gosple Woman”: On Language in the Courtroom Discourse during the Salem Witch Trials, with Special Reference to Female Examinees. Studia Neophilologica 84:sup1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Kohnen, Thomas
2014. Speech acts: a diachronic perspective. In Corpus Pragmatics,  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
Kurzon, Dennis & Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
2018. Introduction. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli & Miriam A. Locher
2023. Corpus Pragmatics, DOI logo
Leitner, Magdalena & Andreas H. Jucker
2021. Historical Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 687 ff. DOI logo
Leone, Ljubica
2022. Prepositional verb/simplex alternation in the Late Modern English period: evidence from the Proceedings of the Old Bailey. Studia Neophilologica 94:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Lutzky, Ursula
2019. “But it is not prov’d”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
2021. The sociopragmatic nature of interjections in Early Modern English drama comedy. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:2  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Enola Gilbert
2018. Multimodal Conduct in the Law, DOI logo
Matoesian, Gregory M.
2008. You Might Win the Battle but Lose the War. Journal of English Linguistics 36:3  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Milà-Garcia, Alba
2018. Pragmatic Annotation for a Multi-Layered Analysis of Speech Acts: A Methodological Proposal. Corpus Pragmatics 2:3  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2019. Questioning. In The Discursive Construction of Blame,  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Ronan, Patricia
2020. Chapter 10. Question strategies in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97],  pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Stoian, Claudia Elena
2020. Marcela Alina Fărcașiu, Language in the Courtroom: A Comparative Study of American and Romanian Criminal Trials, Casa Cărții de Știință, Cluj-Napoca, 2015, 302 p.. Diacronia :11 DOI logo
2020. Marcela Alina Fărcașiu, Language in the Courtroom: A Comparative Study of American and Romanian Criminal Trials, Casa Cărții de Știință, Cluj-Napoca, 2015, 302 p.. Diacronia :11 DOI logo
Støle, Hildegunn
2015. Review of Lutzky (2012): Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Tracy, Karen & Jessica Robles
2009. Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction. Discourse Studies 11:2  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
VENNEMANN, THEO
2009. Celtic influence in English? Yes and No. English Language and Linguistics 13:2  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Vries, Oebele
2022. Instances of direct speech, authentic and imaginary, in Old Frisian. In From West to North Frisia [NOWELE Supplement Series, 33],  pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Williams, Christopher
2020. Review of Fanego, Teresa and Paula Rodríguez-Puente eds. 2019. Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN: 978-9-027-20235-2. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8  pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Wilson, John & Heather Walker
2015. Pragmatic markers as implicit emotive anchoring. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],  pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Włodarczyk, Matylda & Irma Taavitsainen
2017. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics,  pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2005046003 | Marc record