Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760)

A sociopragmatic analysis

Dawn Archer | University of Central Lancashire

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027253781 (Eur) | EUR 125.00

ISBN 9781588116369 (USA) | USD 188.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027294432 | EUR 125.00 | USD 188.00

This book belongs to the rapidly growing field of historical pragmatics. More specifically, it aims to lend definition to the area of historical sociopragmatics. It seeks to enhance our understanding of the language of the historical courtroom by documenting changes to the discursive roles of the most active participant groups of the English courtroom (e.g. the judges, lawyers, witnesses and defendants) in the period 1640–1760. Although the primary focus is on questions and answers, this book also analyses the use of eliciting and non-eliciting devices (e.g. requests and commands) as a means of demonstrating similarities and differences over time. Particular strengths of this work include the study of different types of trial, making the results potentially more representative of the courtroom in general, and the innovative discourse analytic approach, which blends corpus methodology and sociopragmatic analysis, thereby enabling the quantitative analysis of functional phenomena.

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 135] 2005. xiv, 374 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135

Table of Contents

1. Investigating the English historical courtroom | pp. 1–21

2. The characteristics of questions and answers | pp. 23–71

3. Questioning procedures in courtrooms | pp. 73–104

4. A systematic approach to context identification and analysis | pp. 105–134

5. Questions in the historical courtroom (1640–1760) | pp. 135–163

6. Interactional intent of participants’ utterances | pp. 165–174

7. Judicial examiners’ questioning strategies | pp. 175–197

8. Lawyers’ questioning strategies (1640–1760) | pp. 199–221

9. Defendants’ strategies (1640–1670) | pp. 223–244

10. Witnesses’ ‘answering’ strategies (1640–1760) | pp. 245–266

11. Courtroom interaction in the historical period: More than 'questions' and 'answers' | pp. 267–280

12. Concluding comments | pp. 281–293

Notes | pp. 295–307

Appendices | pp. 309–235

Index | pp. 365–372

“Archer's book can be a very useful one, for those interested in historical linguistics and for those with a background and interest in the history of law.”

Book Digest Vol. V, Nr. 2 (2005)

Cited by (54)

Cited by 54 other publications

Order by:

Díaz-Vera, Javier E.

2024. Negotiating converso identities in the inquisition courtroom. Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed

2023. Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode. Social Semiotics 33:1 ► pp. 64 ff.

Alduais, Ahmed, Mohammed Ali Al-Khulaidi, Silvia Allegretta & Mona Mohammed Abdulkhalek

2023. Forensic linguistics: A scientometric review. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1

Kondowe, Wellman

2023. Insincerity in lawyers’ questioning strategies in Malawian criminal courtroom discourse. Text & Talk

Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli & Miriam A. Locher

2023. Corpus Pragmatics,

Westphal, Michael & Guyanne Wilson

2023. Creole and power. In New Englishes, New Methods [Varieties of English Around the World, G68], ► pp. 84 ff.

李, 静

2023. A Review of Foreign Courtroom Discourse Studies. Modern Linguistics 11:05 ► pp. 2311 ff.

Blas Arroyo, José Luis

2022. Constraint factors in the formulation of questions in conflictual discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 187 ff.

Boginskaya, Olga

2022. Dissenting with conviction: boosting in challenging the majority opinion. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7:2 ► pp. 257 ff.

Culpeper, Jonathan

2022. Affirmatives in Early Modern English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics ► pp. 243 ff.

Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski & Abe Sweiry

2022. Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict ► pp. 1 ff.

Leone, Ljubica

2022. Prepositional verb/simplex alternation in the Late Modern English period: evidence from the Proceedings of the Old Bailey. Studia Neophilologica 94:1 ► pp. 59 ff.

Vries, Oebele

2022. Instances of direct speech, authentic and imaginary, in Old Frisian. In From West to North Frisia [NOWELE Supplement Series, 33], ► pp. 423 ff.

Guo, Hui & Yaxin Wu

2021. Inference-embedded yes/no interrogatives in Mandarin Chinese conversation. East Asian Pragmatics 6:2

Leitner, Magdalena & Andreas H. Jucker

2021. Historical Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 687 ff.

Ronan, Patricia

2020. Chapter 10. Question strategies in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 154 ff.

Stoian, Claudia Elena

2020. Marcela Alina Fărcașiu, Language in the Courtroom: A Comparative Study of American and Romanian Criminal Trials, Casa Cărții de Știință, Cluj-Napoca, 2015, 302 p.. Diacronia :11

Stoian, Claudia Elena

2020. Marcela Alina Fărcașiu, Language in the Courtroom: A Comparative Study of American and Romanian Criminal Trials, Casa Cărții de Știință, Cluj-Napoca, 2015, 302 p.. Diacronia :11

Williams, Christopher

2020. Review of Fanego, Teresa and Paula Rodríguez-Puente eds. 2019. Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN: 978-9-027-20235-2. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8 ► pp. 178 ff.

Claridge, Claudia

2019. Chapter 11. Drinking and crime. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 261 ff.

Fanego, Teresa & Paula Rodríguez-Puente

2019. Chapter 1. “Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer?” English legal discourse past and present. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 1 ff.

Lutzky, Ursula

2019. “But it is not prov’d”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Lutzky, Ursula

2021. The sociopragmatic nature of interjections in Early Modern English drama comedy. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:2 ► pp. 225 ff.

Murphy, James

2019. Questioning. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 47 ff.

Johnson, Alison J.

2018. Chapter 2. “How came you not to cry out?”. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 41 ff.

Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara

2018. Chapter 3. Implicatures in Early Modern English courtroom records. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 65 ff.

Kurzon, Dennis & Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky

2018. Introduction. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 1 ff.

Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Enola Gilbert

2018. Multimodal Conduct in the Law,

Milà-Garcia, Alba

2018. Pragmatic Annotation for a Multi-Layered Analysis of Speech Acts: A Methodological Proposal. Corpus Pragmatics 2:3 ► pp. 265 ff.

Fanego, Teresa, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, Cristina Blanco-García & Iván Tamaredo

2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41:1 ► pp. 53 ff.

Jucker, Andreas H. & Joanna Kopaczyk

2017. Historical (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 433 ff.

Włodarczyk, Matylda & Irma Taavitsainen

2017. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 159 ff.

Støle, Hildegunn

2015. Review of Lutzky (2012): Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 142 ff.

Wilson, John & Heather Walker

2015. Pragmatic markers as implicit emotive anchoring. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258], ► pp. 248 ff.

Bergstrom, Tracy, Donald Brower & Natalie Meyers

2014. IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, ► pp. 441 ff.

Chovanec, Jan

2014. “…but there were no broken legs”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15:2 ► pp. 228 ff.

Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen

2014. Diachronic corpus pragmatics: Intersections and interactions. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 3 ff.

Kohnen, Thomas

2014. Speech acts: a diachronic perspective. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 52 ff.

De Felice, Rachele

2013. A Corpus-Based Classification of Commitments in Business English. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1], ► pp. 153 ff.

Archer, Dawn

2012. Data retrieval in a diachronic context: The case of the historical English courtroom. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ► pp. 145 ff.

Archer, Dawn

2014. Historical Pragmatics: Evidence From The Old Bailey. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:2 ► pp. 259 ff.

Archer, Dawn

2017. Context and historical (socio-)pragmatics twenty years on. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2 ► pp. 315 ff.

Archer, Dawn

2018. Impression management in the Early Modern English courtroom. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 205 ff.

Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena

2012. “I am a Gosple Woman”: On Language in the Courtroom Discourse during the Salem Witch Trials, with Special Reference to Female Examinees. Studia Neophilologica 84:sup1 ► pp. 55 ff.

Palander-Collin, Minna

2012. Social roles, identities, and networks. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ► pp. 412 ff.

Chaemsaithong, Krisda

2011. In Pursuit of an Expert Identity: A Case Study of Experts in the Historical Courtroom. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 24:4 ► pp. 471 ff.

Chaemsaithong, Krisda

2012. Performing self on the witness stand: Stance and relational work in expert witness testimony. Discourse & Society 23:5 ► pp. 465 ff.

Chaemsaithong, Krisda

2018. Dialogic features and interpersonal management in the early courtroom action game. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 341 ff.

Tracy, Karen & Jessica Robles

2009. Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: an introduction. Discourse Studies 11:2 ► pp. 131 ff.

VENNEMANN, THEO

2009. Celtic influence in English? Yes and No. English Language and Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 309 ff.

Matoesian, Gregory M.

2008. You Might Win the Battle but Lose the War. Journal of English Linguistics 36:3 ► pp. 195 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. The Sociopragmatics of Stance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 329],

[no author supplied]

2023. Fictive questions in the Zhuangzi [Figurative Thought and Language, 18],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects