Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness
Editors
This collection of 19 papers celebrates the coming of age of the field of politeness studies, now in its 30th year. It begins with an investigation of the meaning of politeness, especially linguistic politeness, and presents a short history of the field of linguistic politeness studies, showing how such studies go beyond the boundaries of conventional linguistic work, incorporating, as they do, non-language insights. The emphasis of the volume is on non-Western languages and the ways linguistic politeness is achieved with them. Many, if not most, studies have focused on Western languages, but the languages highlighted here show new and different aspects of the phenomena.
The purpose of linguistic politeness is to aid in successful communication throughout the world, and this volume offers a balance of geographical distribution not found elsewhere, including Japanese, Thai, and Chinese, as well as Greek, Swedish and Spanish. It covers such theoretical topics as face, wakimae, social levels, gender-related differences in language usage, directness and indirectness, and intercultural perspectives.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 139] 2005. xii, 342 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 1 July 2008
Published online on 1 July 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgments | p. ix
-
Foreword | pp. xi–xii
-
Introduction: Broadening the horizon of linguistic politenessRobin T. Lakoff and Sachiko Ide | pp. 1–20
-
Part I. General overviews: The plenary papers
-
Civility and its discontents: Or, getting in your faceRobin T. Lakoff | pp. 23–43
-
How and why honorifics can signify dignity and elegance: The indexicality and reflexivity of linguistic ritualsSachiko Ide | pp. 45–64
-
Whither politenessBruce Fraser | pp. 65–83
-
Part II. The theoretical perspective
-
Yoroshiku onegaishimasu: Routine practice of the routine formula in JapaneseMakiko Takekuro | pp. 87–97
-
An argument for a frame-based approach to politeness: Evidence from the use of the imperative in Cypriot GreekMarina Terkourafi | pp. 99–116
-
The significance of ‘face’ and politeness in social interaction as revealed through Thai ‘face’ idiomsMargaret Ukosakul | pp. 117–125
-
Part III. The descriptive perspective
-
Face threatening acts, primary face threatening acts, and the management of discourse: Australian English and speakers of Asian EnglishesChristopher J. Conlan | pp. 129–144
-
Politeness in Thai computer-mediated communicationKrisadawan Hongladarom and Soraj Hongladarom | pp. 145–162
-
Polite diminutives in Spanish: A matter of size?Martha Mendoza | pp. 163–173
-
Indirectness as a politeness strategy of Thai speakersDeeyu Srinarawat | pp. 175–193
-
Part IV. The comparative perspective
-
Japanese honorifics as a marker of sociocultural identity: A view from non-western perspectivesMegumi Yoshida and Chikako Sakurai | pp. 197–215
-
Directness as a source of misunderstanding: The case of requests and suggestionsAlexandra Kallia | pp. 217–234
-
Forms of address in Irish and SwedishAnders Ahlqvist | pp. 235–244
-
Women, men and polite requests: English and GreekEkaterini Kouletaki | pp. 245–274
-
Privacy: An intercultural perspectiveMark Lê | pp. 275–282
-
Selection of linguistic forms for requests and offers: Comparison between English and ChineseMasako Tsuzuki, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Cynthia Patschke and Qin Zhang | pp. 283–298
-
Part V. The historical perspective
-
Japanese pronouns of address: Their behavior and maintenance over timeAndrew Barke and Satoshi Uehara | pp. 301–313
-
An aspect of the origins and development of linguistic politeness in ThaiWilaiwan Khanittanan | pp. 315–335
-
Index | pp. 337–342
“The papers are a welcome addition to the literature on politeness and will have broadened the base from which scholarship that attempts to develop an etic model of politeness can draw its evidence. [...] To the extent that the volume offers perspectives on politeness behaviour from a range of cultural insiders, it is a useful contribution to the body of evidence against which claims about universality can be tested.”
Chris Christie, Loughborough University
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
Lei, Rong & Yongping Ran
Nuworsu, Anastasia, John Paul Basewe Kosiba & Richard Ayertey Lawer
Arifianto, Muhammad Lukman, Kholisin Kholisin, Iqbal Fathi Izzudin & Zulfa Azali Mujahidah
Chen, Xinren & Mengxin Li
Nurjaleka, Lisda, Silvia Nurhayati & Rina Supriatnaningsih
Avodo Avodo, Joseph
Dam, Lincoln
Rajaee, Farhang
Nozawa, Shunsuke
Ihsan, Mas Darul
Dunn, Cynthia Dickel
Morozova, Morozova Ya. I.
Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee
Hoppmann, Michael
2017. Competition and conflict between communicative norms. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 220 ff.
Verschueren, Jef
Verschueren, Jef
Dumitru, Speranta
Nobarany, Syavash & Kellogg S. Booth
Santamaría García, Carmen
2014. Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students' communication through social networking sites. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 387 ff.
Santamaría-García, Carmen
Faiz, Harizah & N. Suhaila
Kronrod, Ann, Amir Grinstein & Luc Wathieu
Kronrod, Ann, Amir Grinstein & Luc Wathieu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General