Collaborating towards Coherence
Lexical cohesion in English discourse
| University of Turku
This book approaches cohesion and coherence from a perspective of interaction and collaboration. After a detailed account of various models of cohesion and coherence, the book suggests that it is fruitful to regard cohesion as contributing to coherence, as a strategy used by communicators to help their fellow communicators create coherence from a text. Throughout the book, the context-sensitive and discourse-specific nature of cohesion is stressed: cohesive relations are created and interpreted in particular texts in particular contexts.
By investigating the use of cohesion in four different types of discourse, the study shows that cohesion is not uniform across discourse types. The analysis reveals that written dialogue (computer-mediated discussions) and spoken monologue (prepared speech) make use of similar cohesive strategies as spoken dialogue (conversations): in these contexts the communicators’ interaction with their fellow communicators leads to a similar outcome. The book suggests that this is an indication of the communicators’ attempt to collaborate towards successful communication.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 146] 2006. ix, 192 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
|
|
1 Introduction: cohesion in discourse
|
1–14
|
|
2 Cohesion, coherence, collaboration
|
15–29
|
|
3 Building the method of analysis: lexical cohesion relations
|
31–71
|
|
4 Spoken and written discourse
|
73–89
|
|
5 The spoken dialogue: face-to-face conversation
|
91–113
|
|
6 The written dialogue: mailing-list language
|
115–132
|
|
7 The written monologue: academic writing
|
133–150
|
|
8 The spoken monologue: prepared speeches
|
151–162
|
|
9 Lexical cohesion across spoken and written discourse
|
163–174
|
|
References
|
175–187
|
|
Index
|
189–192
|
“This book is useful. The style of writing is remarkably clear, and technical terms are well-defined. The main contribution of the book is the reconstructed model of lexical cohesion relations. It offers an insightful way to analyze lexical cohesion, particularly collocations, which are perceived as a challenge to deal with. In addition, it sheds light on the characteristics of lexical cohesion in different text types from varied contextual features. With regard to its audience, this book may be of interest not only to experienced academics, but also to graduate and postgraduate students wishing to learn more about lexical cohesion analysis and a new model for such analysis.”
Angkana Tongpoon, in Linguist List Vol. 18.646 (2007)
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Pragmatics of Tense and Time in News [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 253],
No author info given
2014. O. Dontcheva-Navratilova (2011).Coherence in Political Speeches. Brno: Masaryk University Press. ISBN 978-80-210-5703-6, pp. 201..
Journal of Language and Politics 13:2 ► pp. 371 ff.
Abdul Rahman, Zuhair Abdul Amir
2013. The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Writing by Omani Student-Teachers.
SAGE Open 3:4 ► pp. 215824401350671 ff.
Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S. & John McKenny
2017. The flesh and the bones of cohesive devices: towards a comprehensive model.
Journal of World Languages 4:2 ► pp. 94 ff.
Adornetti, Ines
2015. The Phylogenetic Foundations of Discourse Coherence: A Pragmatic Account of the Evolution of Language.
Biosemiotics 8:3 ► pp. 421 ff.
Arévalo Balboa, Fabiola & Mark Briesmaster
2018. “Claim – Support – Question” Routine to Foster Coherence Within Interactive Oral Communication Among EFL Students.
Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development 20:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Bayat, Nihat & Yeşim Yurdakul
2014. The Degree of Textuality in Speech of Six-year-old Children.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ► pp. 3874 ff.
BELOV, Vadim A.
2019. The usage functions of synonyms in different types of text.
Neophilology :19 ► pp. 265 ff.
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012. Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Braun, Sabine
2012. Creating Coherence in Audio Description.
Meta 56:3 ► pp. 645 ff.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017.
In Analysing Genre: The Colony Text of UNESCO Resolutions,
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017.
In Coherence in political speeches,
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga, Renata Jančaříková, Gabriela Miššíková & Renata Povolná
2017.
In Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse,
Flor, Michael & Beata Beigman Klebanov
2014. Associative lexical cohesion as a factor in text complexity.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 165:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
Ghiban, Ioan Cristian & Ştefan Trǎuşan-Matu
2013.
In Advances in Information Systems and Technologies [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 206],
► pp. 753 ff.
Giray, Görkem & Murat Osman Ünalır
2019. Assessment of text coherence using an ontology‐based relatedness measurement method.
Expert Systems
Hernández-Guerra, Concepción
2012. Outstanding Rhetorical Devices and Textuality in Obama’s Speech in Ghana, Africa.
Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 02:03 ► pp. 97 ff.
Hoek, Jet, Sandrine Zufferey, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J.M. Sanders
2018. The linguistic marking of coherence relations.
Pragmatics & Cognition 25:2 ► pp. 276 ff.
Hou, Junping, Marjolijn Verspoor & Hanneke Loerts
2016. An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development.
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Hublová, Gabriela
2017. Reiteration relations in EFL student academic writing and the effects of online learning.
Discourse and Interaction 10:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Hützen, Nicole & Tatiana Serbina
2018. Lexical chains and topic continuity in the register of popular scientific writing.
Pragmatics and Society 9:1 ► pp. 8 ff.
Kunz, Kerstin, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski, José Manuel Martínez Martínez, Katrin Menzel & Erich Steiner
2018. Shallow features as indicators of English–German contrasts in lexical cohesion.
Languages in Contrast 18:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Li, Xi & Canzhong Wu
2017. Coherence in Hong Lou Meng and its English translations: an exploratory investigation.
Functional Linguistics 4:1
Linnik, Anastasia, Roelien Bastiaanse & Barbara Höhle
2016. Discourse production in aphasia: a current review of theoretical and methodological challenges.
Aphasiology 30:7 ► pp. 765 ff.
los Ángeles Gómez González, María
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Menning, Axel, Benedikt Ewald, Claudia Nicolai & Ulrich Weinberg
2018.
In Design Thinking Research [Understanding Innovation, ],
► pp. 195 ff.
Nakahama, Yuko
2018.
In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64],
► pp. 249 ff.
Oropeza-Escobar, Minerva
2011. Framing and collaboration in storytelling events.
Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Paraschiv, Ionut Cristian, Mihai Dascalu, Stefan Trausan-Matu, Nicolae Nistor, Ambar Murillo Montes De Oca & Danielle S. McNamara
2017.
In 2017 21st International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS),
► pp. 566 ff.
Rajović, Jelena
2019. Elements of cohesion in the translation of poetry in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland with the focus on a poem "You are old, Father William".
Bastina :47 ► pp. 53 ff.
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
2018.
In Introduction to Discourse Studies,
Rojano-Cáceres, José Rafael, Fernando Ramos Quintana & Edgard Benítez Guerrero
2017.
In Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction - Interacción '17,
► pp. 1 ff.
Taboada, Maite
2019.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,
► pp. 311 ff.
Taboada, Maite
2019. The space of coherence relations and their signalling in discourse.
Language, Context and Text 1:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Tenri Ampa, Andi & D Muhammad Basri
2019. Lexical and Grammatical Cohesions in the Students’ Essay Writing as the English Productive skills.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1339 ► pp. 012072 ff.
Tseng, Ming-Yu
2018. Where cultural references and lexical cohesion meet.
Pragmatics 28:4 ► pp. 573 ff.
Zhao, Sumin
2015. Book review: Christian R Hoffmann, Cohesive Profiling: Meaning and Interaction in Personal Weblogs.
Discourse & Communication 9:3 ► pp. 373 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2006042701