Collaborating towards Coherence

Lexical cohesion in English discourse

ORCID logoSanna-Kaisa Tanskanen | University of Turku
ISBN 9789027253897 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027293640 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
Google Play logo
This book approaches cohesion and coherence from a perspective of interaction and collaboration. After a detailed account of various models of cohesion and coherence, the book suggests that it is fruitful to regard cohesion as contributing to coherence, as a strategy used by communicators to help their fellow communicators create coherence from a text. Throughout the book, the context-sensitive and discourse-specific nature of cohesion is stressed: cohesive relations are created and interpreted in particular texts in particular contexts.

By investigating the use of cohesion in four different types of discourse, the study shows that cohesion is not uniform across discourse types. The analysis reveals that written dialogue (computer-mediated discussions) and spoken monologue (prepared speech) make use of similar cohesive strategies as spoken dialogue (conversations): in these contexts the communicators’ interaction with their fellow communicators leads to a similar outcome. The book suggests that this is an indication of the communicators’ attempt to collaborate towards successful communication.

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 146] 2006.  ix, 192 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“This book is useful. The style of writing is remarkably clear, and technical terms are well-defined. The main contribution of the book is the reconstructed model of lexical cohesion relations. It offers an insightful way to analyze lexical cohesion, particularly collocations, which are perceived as a challenge to deal with. In addition, it sheds light on the characteristics of lexical cohesion in different text types from varied contextual features. With regard to its audience, this book may be of interest not only to experienced academics, but also to graduate and postgraduate students wishing to learn more about lexical cohesion analysis and a new model for such analysis.”
Cited by

Cited by 49 other publications

Abdul Rahman, Zuhair Abdul Amir
2013. The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Writing by Omani Student-Teachers. SAGE Open 3:4  pp. 215824401350671 ff. DOI logo
Abdullah Aldosari, Lama
2023. Translation of Substitution and Ellipsis by Professional Translators and Translators in Training: A Contrastive Study. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Adornetti, Ines
2015. The Phylogenetic Foundations of Discourse Coherence: A Pragmatic Account of the Evolution of Language. Biosemiotics 8:3  pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Ahmad, Zulfiqar
2020. Summative Assessment, Test Scores and Text Quality: A Study of Cohesion as an Unspecified Descriptor in the Assessment Scale. European Journal of Educational Research 9:2  pp. 523 ff. DOI logo
Arévalo Balboa, Fabiola & Mark Briesmaster
2018. “Claim – Support – Question” Routine to Foster Coherence Within Interactive Oral Communication Among EFL Students. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development 20:2  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Bayat, Nihat & Yeşim Yurdakul
2014. The Degree of Textuality in Speech of Six-year-old Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116  pp. 3874 ff. DOI logo
BELOV, Vadim A.
2019. The usage functions of synonyms in different types of text. Neophilology :19  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012. Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17:4  pp. 501 ff. DOI logo
Braun, Sabine
2012. Creating Coherence in Audio Description. Meta 56:3  pp. 645 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Hung Phu
2022. Vietnamese EFL Students’ Use and Misconceptions of Cohesive Devices in Writing. SAGE Open 12:3  pp. 215824402211269 ff. DOI logo
Cap, Piotr
2014. Review of Dontcheva-Navratilova (2011): Coherence in Political Speeches. Journal of Language and Politics 13:2  pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
de los Ángeles Gómez González, María
2015. Cohesion. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles
2010. Evaluating lexical cohesion in telephone conversations. Discourse Studies 12:5  pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017. Coherence in political speeches, DOI logo
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2017. Analysing Genre: The Colony Text of UNESCO Resolutions, DOI logo
Dontcheva‐Navratilova, Olga
2012. Grammar and Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga, Renata Jančaříková, Gabriela Miššíková & Renata Povolná
2017. Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse, DOI logo
el Majidi, Abid, Rick de Graaff & Daniel Janssen
2021. Debate as a pedagogical tool for developing speaking skills in second language education. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216882110506 ff. DOI logo
Flor, Michael & Beata Beigman Klebanov
2014. Associative lexical cohesion as a factor in text complexity. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 165:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Ghiban, Ioan Cristian & Ştefan Trǎuşan-Matu
2013. Network Based Analysis of Intertextual Relations. In Advances in Information Systems and Technologies [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 206],  pp. 753 ff. DOI logo
Giray, Görkem & Murat Osman Ünalır
2020. Assessment of text coherence using an ontology‐based relatedness measurement method. Expert Systems 37:3 DOI logo
Hernández-Guerra, Concepción
2012. Outstanding Rhetorical Devices and Textuality in Obama’s Speech in Ghana, Africa. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 02:03  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Hoek, Jet, Sandrine Zufferey, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders
2018. The linguistic marking of coherence relations. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:2  pp. 276 ff. DOI logo
Hou, Junping, Marjolijn Verspoor & Hanneke Loerts
2016. An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 5:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Hublová, Gabriela
Hützen, Nicole & Tatiana Serbina
2018. Lexical chains and topic continuity in the register of popular scientific writing. Pragmatics and Society 9:1  pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Isa, Joy
2022. A Stylistic Study of Akandu Stella Nkechi’s "My Mother’s Blessing". Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature 5  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Kunz, Kerstin, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski, José Manuel Martínez Martínez, Katrin Menzel & Erich Steiner
2018. Shallow features as indicators of English–German contrasts in lexical cohesion. Languages in Contrast 18:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Laippala, Veronika
2017. Variation in the Marking of Text Organization in French Research Articles: From Short and Specific to Extended and Vague. Discours :20 DOI logo
Lewandowski, Marcin
2020. Cohesion in Polish-English Translation and Its Implications for Translator Training. Research in Language 18:2  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xi & Canzhong Wu
2017. Coherence in Hong Lou Meng and its English translations: an exploratory investigation. Functional Linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Linnik, Anastasia, Roelien Bastiaanse & Barbara Höhle
2016. Discourse production in aphasia: a current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology 30:7  pp. 765 ff. DOI logo
Lintunen, Pekka & Mari Mäkilä
2014. Measuring Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Learner Language: Comparing the Incomparable?. Research in Language 12:4  pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Menning, Axel, Benedikt Ewald, Claudia Nicolai & Ulrich Weinberg
2018. “… and not building on that”: The Relation of Low Coherence and Creativity in Design Conversations. In Design Thinking Research [Understanding Innovation, ],  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Nakahama, Yuko
2018. Chapter 10. Effects of L2 exposure on the use of discourse devices in L2 storytelling. In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64],  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Oropeza-Escobar, Minerva
2022. Framing and collaboration in storytelling events. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Palmer, Alexis, Caroline Sporleder & Linlin Li
2012. So to Speak: A Computational and Empirical Investigation of Lexical Cohesion of Non-Literal and Literal Expressions in Text. Discours :11 DOI logo
Paraschiv, Ionut Cristian, Mihai Dascalu, Stefan Trausan-Matu, Nicolae Nistor, Ambar Murillo Montes De Oca & Danielle S. McNamara
2017. 2017 21st International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS),  pp. 566 ff. DOI logo
Rajović, Jelena
2019. Elements of cohesion in the translation of poetry in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland with the focus on a poem "You are old, Father William". Bastina :47  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
Rojano-Cáceres, José Rafael, Fernando Ramos Quintana & Edgard Benítez Guerrero
2017. Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stöckl, Hartmut & Jana Pflaeging
2022. Multimodal Coherence Revisited: Notes on the Move From Theory to Data in Annotating Print Advertisements. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Taboada, Maite
2019. Cohesion and Conjunction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Taboada, Maite
2019. The space of coherence relations and their signalling in discourse. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Tseng, Ming-Yu
2022. Where cultural references and lexical cohesion meet. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Yue & Xiaoxuan Lv
2022. Effects of Content Support and Planning Instruction on Discourse Connection in EFL Argumentative Writing. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Zhao, Sumin
2015. Book review: Christian R Hoffmann, Cohesive Profiling: Meaning and Interaction in Personal Weblogs. Discourse & Communication 9:3  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.


Main BIC Subject

CF: Linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2006042701 | Marc record