Collaborating towards Coherence

Lexical cohesion in English discourse

Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen | University of Turku

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027253897 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027293640 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00

This book approaches cohesion and coherence from a perspective of interaction and collaboration. After a detailed account of various models of cohesion and coherence, the book suggests that it is fruitful to regard cohesion as contributing to coherence, as a strategy used by communicators to help their fellow communicators create coherence from a text. Throughout the book, the context-sensitive and discourse-specific nature of cohesion is stressed: cohesive relations are created and interpreted in particular texts in particular contexts.

By investigating the use of cohesion in four different types of discourse, the study shows that cohesion is not uniform across discourse types. The analysis reveals that written dialogue (computer-mediated discussions) and spoken monologue (prepared speech) make use of similar cohesive strategies as spoken dialogue (conversations): in these contexts the communicators’ interaction with their fellow communicators leads to a similar outcome. The book suggests that this is an indication of the communicators’ attempt to collaborate towards successful communication.

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 146] 2006. ix, 192 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.146

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements

1 Introduction: cohesion in discourse | pp. 1–14

2 Cohesion, coherence, collaboration | pp. 15–29

3 Building the method of analysis: lexical cohesion relations | pp. 31–71

4 Spoken and written discourse | pp. 73–89

5 The spoken dialogue: face-to-face conversation | pp. 91–113

6 The written dialogue: mailing-list language | pp. 115–132

7 The written monologue: academic writing | pp. 133–150

8 The spoken monologue: prepared speeches | pp. 151–162

9 Lexical cohesion across spoken and written discourse | pp. 163–174

References | pp. 175–187

Index | pp. 189–192

“This book is useful. The style of writing is remarkably clear, and technical terms are well-defined. The main contribution of the book is the reconstructed model of lexical cohesion relations. It offers an insightful way to analyze lexical cohesion, particularly collocations, which are perceived as a challenge to deal with. In addition, it sheds light on the characteristics of lexical cohesion in different text types from varied contextual features. With regard to its audience, this book may be of interest not only to experienced academics, but also to graduate and postgraduate students wishing to learn more about lexical cohesion analysis and a new model for such analysis.”

Angkana Tongpoon, in Linguist List Vol. 18.646 (2007)

Cited by (55)

Cited by 55 other publications

Order by:

Cambria, Mariavita

2024. Towards online audiovisual translation of videos. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 10:1 ► pp. 28 ff.

Flowerdew, John

2024. Resumptive Post-Modification as a Cohesive Feature of Signalling Nouns. In Nouns and the Morphosyntax / Semantics Interface, ► pp. 351 ff.

Herriman, Jennifer

2024. The thematic organization of consumer safety instructions in English. English Text Construction 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Abdullah Aldosari, Lama

2023. Translation of Substitution and Ellipsis by Professional Translators and Translators in Training: A Contrastive Study. SSRN Electronic Journal

Tekwa, Kizito

2023. Literature Review. In Machine Translation and Foreign Language Learning [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 11 ff.

Bui, Hung Phu

2022. Vietnamese EFL Students’ Use and Misconceptions of Cohesive Devices in Writing. Sage Open 12:3

Isa, Joy

2022. A Stylistic Study of Akandu Stella Nkechi’s "My Mother’s Blessing". Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature 5 ► pp. 14 ff.

Oropeza-Escobar, Minerva

2022. Framing and collaboration in storytelling events. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 213 ff.

Stöckl, Hartmut & Jana Pflaeging

2022. Multimodal Coherence Revisited: Notes on the Move From Theory to Data in Annotating Print Advertisements. Frontiers in Communication 7

Tseng, Ming-Yu

2022. Where cultural references and lexical cohesion meet. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 573 ff.

Xie, Yue & Xiaoxuan Lv

2022. Effects of Content Support and Planning Instruction on Discourse Connection in EFL Argumentative Writing. Frontiers in Psychology 13

el Majidi, Abid, Rick de Graaff & Daniel Janssen

2021. Debate as a pedagogical tool for developing speaking skills in second language education. Language Teaching Research

Faraj, Ghusoon K.

2021. Conjunctions as Cohesive Devices in Some Selected Animated Movies: A Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 11:3

Ahmad, Zulfiqar

2020. Summative Assessment, Test Scores and Text Quality: A Study of Cohesion as an Unspecified Descriptor in the Assessment Scale. European Journal of Educational Research volume-9-2020:volume-9-issue-2-april-2020 ► pp. 523 ff.

Giray, Görkem & Murat Osman Ünalır

2020. Assessment of text coherence using an ontology‐based relatedness measurement method. Expert Systems 37:3

Lewandowski, Marcin

2020. Cohesion in Polish-English Translation and Its Implications for Translator Training. Research in Language 18:2 ► pp. 219 ff.

Ahmad, Muhammad, Muhammad Asim Mahmood & Ali Raza Siddique

2019. Organisational Skills in Academic Writing: A Study on Coherence and Cohesion in Pakistani Research Abstracts. Languages 4:4 ► pp. 92 ff.

BELOV, Vadim A.

2019. The usage functions of synonyms in different types of text. Neophilology :19 ► pp. 265 ff.

Rajović, Jelena

2019. Elements of cohesion in the translation of poetry in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland with the focus on a poem "You are old, Father William". Bastina :47 ► pp. 53 ff.

Taboada, Maite

2019. Cohesion and Conjunction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 311 ff.

Taboada, Maite

2019. The space of coherence relations and their signalling in discourse. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2 ► pp. 205 ff.

Arévalo Balboa, Fabiola & Mark Briesmaster

2018. “Claim – Support – Question” Routine to Foster Coherence Within Interactive Oral Communication Among EFL Students. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development 20:2 ► pp. 143 ff.

Hoek, Jet, Sandrine Zufferey, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders

2018. The linguistic marking of coherence relations. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:2 ► pp. 276 ff.

Hützen, Nicole & Tatiana Serbina

2018. Lexical chains and topic continuity in the register of popular scientific writing. Pragmatics and Society 9:1 ► pp. 8 ff.

Kunz, Kerstin, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski, José Manuel Martínez Martínez, Katrin Menzel & Erich Steiner

2018. Shallow features as indicators of English–German contrasts in lexical cohesion. Languages in Contrast 18:2 ► pp. 175 ff.

Menning, Axel, Benedikt Ewald, Claudia Nicolai & Ulrich Weinberg

2018. “… and not building on that”: The Relation of Low Coherence and Creativity in Design Conversations. In Design Thinking Research [Understanding Innovation, ], ► pp. 195 ff.

Nakahama, Yuko

2018. Chapter 10. Effects of L2 exposure on the use of discourse devices in L2 storytelling. In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64], ► pp. 249 ff.

Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert

2018. Introduction to Discourse Studies,

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga

2017. Coherence in political speeches,

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga

2017. Analysing Genre: The Colony Text of UNESCO Resolutions,

Dontcheva‐Navratilova, Olga

2012. Grammar and Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga, Renata Jančaříková, Gabriela Miššíková & Renata Povolná

2017. Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse,

Hublová, Gabriela

2017. REITERATION RELATIONS IN EFL STUDENT ACADEMIC WRITING AND THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE LEARNING. Discourse and Interaction 10:1 ► pp. 71 ff.

Laippala, Veronika

2017. Variation in the Marking of Text Organization in French Research Articles: From Short and Specific to Extended and Vague. Discours :20

Li, Xi & Canzhong Wu

2017. Coherence in Hong Lou Meng and its English translations: an exploratory investigation. Functional Linguistics 4:1

Paraschiv, Ionut Cristian, Mihai Dascalu, Stefan Trausan-Matu, Nicolae Nistor, Ambar Murillo Montes De Oca & Danielle S. McNamara

2017. 2017 21st International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS), ► pp. 566 ff.

Rojano-Cáceres, José Rafael, Fernando Ramos Quintana & Edgard Benítez Guerrero

2017. Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.

Hou, Junping, Marjolijn Verspoor & Hanneke Loerts

2016. An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

Linnik, Anastasia, Roelien Bastiaanse & Barbara Höhle

2016. Discourse production in aphasia: a current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology 30:7 ► pp. 765 ff.

Adornetti, Ines

2015. The Phylogenetic Foundations of Discourse Coherence: A Pragmatic Account of the Evolution of Language. Biosemiotics 8:3 ► pp. 421 ff.

de los Ángeles Gómez González, María

2015. Cohesion. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.

Gómez González, María de los Ángeles

2010. Evaluating lexical cohesion in telephone conversations. Discourse Studies 12:5 ► pp. 599 ff.

Zhao, Sumin

2015. Book review: Christian R Hoffmann, Cohesive Profiling: Meaning and Interaction in Personal Weblogs. Discourse & Communication 9:3 ► pp. 373 ff.

Bayat, Nihat & Yeşim Yurdakul

2014. The Degree of Textuality in Speech of Six-year-old Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ► pp. 3874 ff.

Cap, Piotr

2014. Review of Dontcheva-Navratilova (2011): Coherence in Political Speeches. Journal of Language and Politics 13:2 ► pp. 371 ff.

Flor, Michael & Beata Beigman Klebanov

2014. Associative lexical cohesion as a factor in text complexity. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 165:2 ► pp. 223 ff.

Lintunen, Pekka & Mari Mäkilä

2014. Measuring Syntactic Complexity in Spoken and Written Learner Language: Comparing the Incomparable?. Research in Language 12:4 ► pp. 377 ff.

Abdul Rahman, Zuhair Abdul Amir

2013. The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Writing by Omani Student-Teachers. Sage Open 3:4

Ghiban, Ioan Cristian & Ştefan Trǎuşan-Matu

2013. Network Based Analysis of Intertextual Relations. In Advances in Information Systems and Technologies [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 206], ► pp. 753 ff.

Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich

2012. Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17:4 ► pp. 501 ff.

Braun, Sabine

2012. Creating Coherence in Audio Description. Meta 56:3 ► pp. 645 ff.

Hernández-Guerra, Concepción

2012. Outstanding Rhetorical Devices and Textuality in Obama’s Speech in Ghana, Africa. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 02:03 ► pp. 97 ff.

Palmer, Alexis, Caroline Sporleder & Linlin Li

2012. So to Speak: A Computational and Empirical Investigation of Lexical Cohesion of Non-Literal and Literal Expressions in Text. Discours :11

[no author supplied]

2014. Pragmatics of Tense and Time in News [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 253],

[no author supplied]

2021. Conjunctive Markers of Contrast in English and French [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 99],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects