The Nonverbal Shift in Early Modern English Conversation
This is the first historical investigation on the nonverbal component of conversation. In the courtly society of 16th and 17th century England, it is argued that a drift appeared toward an increased use of prosodic means of expression at the expense of gestural means. Direct evidence is provided by courtesy books and personal documents of the time, indirect evidence by developments in the English lexicon. The rationale of the argument is cognitively grounded; given the integral role of gestures in thinking-for-speaking, it rests on an isomorphism between gestural and prosodic behavior that is established semiotically and elaborated by insights from neurocognitive frequency theory and task dynamics. The proposal is rounded off by an illustration from present-day conversational data and the proof of its adaptability to current theories of language change. The cross-disciplinary approach addresses all those interested in (historical) pragmatics, cognitive linguistics, cultural semantics, semiotics, or language change.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 154] 2007. x, 281 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 1 July 2008
Published online on 1 July 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Introduction | pp. vii–ix
-
Subjecting the body to control | pp. 1–23
-
Are gestures dispensable? | pp. 25–38
-
The touchstone of real life | pp. 39–52
-
Words for gestures? | pp. 53–119
-
Turning to the vocal mode | pp. 121–145
-
Pieces of historical evidence for a prosodic turn | pp. 147–170
-
Repercussions of the prosodic turn in the lexicon | pp. 171–220
-
Prince and petit bourgeois: A virtual picture | pp. 221–251
-
Recast into a conjectural history of modal change | pp. 253–262
-
Bibliography | pp. 263–272
-
Author index | pp. 273–274
-
Subject index | pp. 275–278
“Hübler's pioneering work on non-verbal elements in EModE conversation is a thought-provoking and demanding read, which presupposes a sound knowledge of cognitive theory. His argument is theoretically well-founded, it appears absolutely reasonable and certainly effectively utilises the data which we, as modern researchers, have at our disposal.”
Birte Bös, Universität Rostock, in the Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 11:1 (2110)
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Ljungberg, Johannes & Natacha Klein Käfer
Brown, Lucien, Iris Hübscher & Andreas H. Jucker
2023. Chapter 1. Multimodal im/politeness. In Multimodal Im/politeness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 333], ► pp. 1 ff.
Maslov, Boris & Tatiana Nikitina
Hall, Jon
2019. Seneca’s De Beneficiis and non-verbal politeness in ancient Rome. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General