Political Discourse in the Media

Cross-cultural perspectives

ORCID logoAnita Fetzer | Universität Lüneburg
Gerda Eva Lauerbach | Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
ISBN 9789027254030 | EUR 110.00 | USD 165.00
ISBN 9789027292278 | EUR 110.00 | USD 165.00
Google Play logo
This book departs from the premise that political discourse is intrinsically connected with media discourse, as shaped by its cultural and transcultural characteristics. It presents a collection of papers which examine political discourse in the media from a cross-culturally comparative perspective in Arab, Dutch, British, Finnish, Flemish, French, German, Israeli, Swedish, US-American and international contexts. By using different theoretical frameworks, such as conversation analysis, discourse analysis, pragmatics and systemic functional linguistics, the papers reflect current moves in political discourse analysis to cross-disciplinary and methodological boundaries by integrating semiotics, particularly multimodality, cognition, context, genre and recipient design.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 160] 2007.  viii, 379 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“One of the most attractive aspects of this collection of nine articles is the way they deal with the 'global in the local'. In our multi-cultural world, we have to understand that cultures no longer can be identified with any homogeneous speech community, nor can culture be limited to any particular, well-defined territory. It is precisely where Fetzer & Lauerbach's volume has its force: by analyzing political discourse in the media, the authors and editors open up new vistas on the vexing problem of the intra- vs. the inter-cultural. Doing this, they contribute to the current debates on these issues.”
“This is a significant collection offering rich insights into a number of current areas in political media discourse, ranging from the analysis of cross-cultural variations in the discursive practices of political interviews to the differences and similarities between media events across cultures. The chapters in the book differ in types of TV genres focused on, but share a commitment to the rigorous application of discourse-analytical theories and methods to the analysis of media. The book is a welcome addition to the growing body of literature on media discourse, convincingly demonstrating the crucial importance of discursive practices in the process of shaping culturally unique media effects.”
“[...] the strength of Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives lies primarily in the interdisciplinary methodologies it includes. Because of its focus on cross-cultural discourse-analytic examples, it will be of interest not only to those who are interested in discourse analysis, politics, and media, but also to those interested in translation and interpreting studies as well as culture studies. All in all, the book is a rich source of theory and practice regarding political discourse in the media across cultures.”
“It is as a result of a cross-cultural perspective that we are made aware of differences in political discourse. It is the significant value of this volume that it demonstrates how such a perspective can enrich our understanding of mediated political discourse.”
“Overall, this volume provides an in-depth analysis of political discourse presented in different media events, focusing mainly on the discourse articulated by political actors on TV.The quality of both the theoretical and empirical frameworks utilized in the various papers is high. This is a well-informed book which informs and illuminates an important area of research for anyone interested in the role that the media plays in political discourse across cultures and vice versa.”
Cited byCited by 24 other publicationsAbd Hassan, Bushra & Hashim Aliwy Mohammed Alhusseini2020. METAPHORICAL EXPRESSIONS IN SHAFAK’S NOVEL “THE FORTY RULES OF LOVE”: A COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC STUDY. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH 8:2 ► pp. 28 ff. Al-Duleimi, Abbas Deygan Darweesh & Waleed Ridha Hammoodi2015. A Pragmatic Study of Strategic Maneuvering in Selected Political Interviews. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:01 ► pp. 79 ff. Arroyo, José Luis Blas2015. Pragmatics of Political Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Marjut Johansson2008. Prologue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:4 ► pp. 324 ff. Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa & Ana Albalat-Mascarell2023. The use of boosters and evidentials in British campaign debates on the Brexit referendum. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Devlin, Anne Marie2017. Lard-eaters, gay-ropeans, sheeple and prepositions: lexical and syntactic devices employed to position the other in Russian online political forums. Russian Journal of Communication 9:1 ► pp. 53 ff. Fetzer, Anita2008. “And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing With It”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:4 ► pp. 384 ff. 2012. Grammar in Political Debate. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 2014. WeandI, andyouandthem: People, power and solidarity. In The Expression of Inequality in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 248], ► pp. 213 ff. 2014. “Judgeuson whatwedo”: The strategic use of collectivewein British 
political discourse. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 331 ff. Johansson, Marjut2015. If I am elected President …. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 259], ► pp. 219 ff. Jovanovii, Srran M.2017. Passportism: Xenophobia from Discourse to Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal Kolodii, Nataliia, Ekaterina Khomyakova, Vyacheslav Kolodii, Yuliya Chayka, I. Ardashkin & N. Martyushev2016. A spectacularity concept in modern philosophy. SHS Web of Conferences 28 ► pp. 01057 ff. Mosiyevych, Larysa2017. The Formation of a Modern Translation Competence in Translator Training. In At the Crossroads: Challenges of Foreign Language Learning [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 189 ff. Parvaresh, Vahid2014. Book review: Anita Fetzer (ed.), The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 25:3 ► pp. 411 ff. Sanz, Marina González2016. Chapter 6. Lexical colloquialisation in commissions of the Andalusian Parliament. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 109 ff. Schubert, Christoph2014. I haven’t spoken to him about it. Language and Dialogue 4:1 ► pp. 58 ff. Serrano, María José2019. The variable functions of addressing hearer-participants with Spanish second person object forms in media discourse. In It’s not all aboutyou [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 282 ff. Silverstein, Michael2011. What Goes Around . . . : Some Shtick from “Tricky Dick” and the Circulation of U.S. Presidential Image. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21:1 ► pp. 54 ff. Sivenkova, Maria2008. Expressing Commitment When Asking Multiunit Questions in Parliamentary Debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:4 ► pp. 359 ff. Vertommen, Bram2022. The strategic value of pronominal choice. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 361 ff. Yegorova, Lyudmila2018. Modern Regional Media Discourse Features (on the Example of the Republic of Crimea Printed Press). Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism 7:4 ► pp. 615 ff. [no author supplied]2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff. 2017. Erratum. Russian Journal of Communication 9:1 ► pp. x ff. This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Communication Studies

Communication Studies

Main BIC Subject

CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis

Main BISAC Subject

LAN004000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2007009990 | Marc record