Part of
Speech Acts in the History of EnglishEdited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176] 2008
► pp. 45–84
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176] 2008
► pp. 45–84
Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play-texts, 1640-1760
Cited by
Cited by 35 other publications
Alonso Almeida, Francisco & Margarita Mele-Marrero
2014. Stancetaking in seventeenth-century prefaces on obstetrics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics ► pp. 1 ff. 
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco José Álvarez-Gil
2021. Impoliteness in women’s specialised writing in seventeenth-century English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Archer, Dawn
2012. Data retrieval in a diachronic context: The case of the historical English courtroom. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ► pp. 145 ff.
Archer, Dawn
2014. Historical Pragmatics: Evidence From The Old Bailey. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Baker, Olja
2021. Parliamentary directives in New Zealand and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Languages in Contrast 21:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2017. K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.) (2015). Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook
. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Jim O’Driscoll & Claire Hardaker
2019. Notions of Politeness in Britain and North America. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 175 ff.
Elsweiler, Christine
2022. Gender variation in the requestive behaviour of Early Modern Scottish and English letter-writers? A study of private correspondence. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Evans, Mel
2017. Royal language and reported discourse in sixteenth-century correspondence. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Fedriani, Chiara
2017. Chapter 5. Quapropter, quaeso? ‘Why, for pity’s sake?’. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 83 ff.
Fedriani, Chiara & Andrea Sansó
2017. Introduction. Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186], ► pp. 1 ff.
Hoey, Elliott M.
2022. Self-authorizing action: On let me X in English social interaction. Language in Society 51:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Jucker, Andreas
2020. Politeness in the History of English,
King, Jeremy
2018. Chapter 6. Hasta perder la última gota de mi sangre. In Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 340], ► pp. 127 ff.
Kohnen, Thomas
2014. Speech acts: a diachronic perspective. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 52 ff.
Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli & Miriam A. Locher
2023. Corpus Pragmatics,
Lanteigne, Betty
2014. Speech event analysis of seventeenth-century military protocol in Hamlet, 1.1. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Leitner, Magdalena & Andreas H. Jucker
2021. Historical Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 687 ff.
Mele-Marrero, Margarita & Francisco Alonso-Almeida
2011. The Role of the Pronounsheandshein Seventeenth-Century Obstetric Directives*. Studia Neophilologica 83:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Milà-Garcia, Alba
2018. Pragmatic Annotation for a Multi-Layered Analysis of Speech Acts: A Methodological Proposal. Corpus Pragmatics 2:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Murphy, Sean, Dawn Archer & Jane Demmen
2020. Mapping the links between gender, status and genre in Shakespeare’s plays. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:3 ► pp. 223 ff.
Põldvere, Nele, Rachele De Felice & Carita Paradis
2022. Advice in Conversation,
Recuero, Silvia Iglesias
2022. Actos directivos en la comedia burguesa de costumbres del siglo XVIII: ¿hacia patrones lingüísticos y de uso modernos? I. Formulaciones directas. Romanica Cracoviensia 22:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Recuero, Silvia Iglesias
2023. Actos directivos en la comedia burguesa de costumbres del siglo XVIII: ¿hacia patrones lingüísticos y de uso modernos? II. Formulaciones indirectas. Romanica Cracoviensia 23:2 ► pp. 35 ff.
Reichl, Isabella
2022. Refusals in Early Modern English drama texts. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 253 ff.
Rogos-Hebda, Anna
2021. Review. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56:1 ► pp. 749 ff.
Schaefer, Ursula
2012. Oral practices in the history of English. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ► pp. 285 ff.
Shvanyukova, Polina
2019. Chapter 5. Promoting negative politeness in nineteenth-century England. In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299], ► pp. 171 ff.
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017. (Im)politeness and Cultural Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 571 ff.
Tag Eldin, Khalid
2022. Sudanese University Students’ Arabic and English Request Modifiers . مجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم الانسانية والاجتماعية 19:3
Tantucci, Vittorio & Aiqing Wang
2020. Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies 22:2 ► pp. 146 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Vittorio Tantucci
2022. Getting attention in different languages: A usage-based approach to parenthetical look in Chinese, Dutch, English, and Italian. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Wierzbicka, Anna
2012. The history of English seen as the history of ideas: Cultural change reflected in different translations of the New Testament. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ► pp. 434 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.