Certainty and commitment in the construction of academic knowledge in the humanities
In this paper we report on the analysis of thirty two research articles written in Spanish in the fields of education, linguistics, philosophy and psychology, with the purpose of identifying writers’ choices of modality and modal commitment. The objective was to find out how disciplinary discourse varies across disciplines in the humanities with respect to the use of possibility, probability, obligation, inclination and quantity, along the dimensions of knowledge about the discipline, the research process and text organization. The analysis shows high modal commitment in most disciplines studied, but important differences are found as far as use of the signals used and the type of knowledge referred to.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Sánchez-Jiménez, David
2024.
Retórica intercultural en el discurso académico universitario: las funciones retóricas de la citación en los Trabajos de Fin de Máster escritos en español y en inglés por hablantes nativos y no nativos.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 97
► pp. 289 ff.
Bolívar, Adriana
2010.
A change in focus: from texts in contexts to people in events.
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 5:3
► pp. 213 ff.
Bolívar, Adriana
2013.
The co-construction of scientific knowledge in intercultural discourse.
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 8:2
► pp. 113 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.