Some presupposition triggers, like too, seem to be obligatory in discourses where the presupposition they induce is explicitely expressed. We show that this phenomenon concerns a larger class than is usually acknowledged, and suggest that this class corresponds to the class of presupposition triggers that have no asserted content. We then propose a pragmatic explanation relying on the neo-gricean notion of antipresupposition. We also show that the phenomenon has a complex interaction with discourse relations.
2018. Hurford Conditionals. Journal of Semantics 35:2 ► pp. 357 ff.
Amsili, Pascal & Claire Beyssade
2017. Le même ou un autre : l’expression de l’identité et de la différence en discours. Travaux de linguistique n° 72:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Abrusán, Márta
2016. Presupposition cancellation: explaining the ‘soft–hard’ trigger distinction. Natural Language Semantics 24:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Bonvin, Audrey & Christine Dimroth
2016. Additive Linking in Second Language Discourse: Lexical, Syntactic and Discourse Organizational Choices in Intermediate and Advanced Learners of L2 German with L1 French. Discours :18
Beyssade, Claire
2013. Back to uniqueness presupposition. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes :42 ► pp. 123 ff.
Amsili, Pascal & Grégoire Winterstein
2012. Les déclencheurs de présupposition additifs. Langages n° 186:2 ► pp. 85 ff.
Grønn, Atle & Kjell Johan Sæbø
2012. A, The, Another: A Game of Same and Different. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
[no author supplied]
2017. Bibliographie. In Sous le sens, ► pp. 247 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.