Grammar
A neglected resource in interaction analysis?
Our aim in this paper is to explore the variety of ways in which grammar can be used as a resource for interaction. We propose that a grammatical analysis of social interaction needs to take two perspectives into account. The first involves showing how the meaning of a grammatical unit depends on its context of use (Schegloff 1996). The second involves identifying speakers’ specific choices of grammatical categories (e.g., verbs, nouns, etc.) and showing how these categories combine to create specific inference-rich meanings (Halliday 1978, 1994). Drawing from couples therapy data, we show that by adopting grammatical categories into our analysis, a unique perspective on the moment-to-moment unfolding of therapy can be provided.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2012.
Taxonomy and Selectivity. In
Dialogical Genres,
► pp. 3 ff.
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2012.
A Historical Search for Genres of Spoken Dialogue. In
Dialogical Genres,
► pp. 67 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.