Discourse Markers in Early Modern English

| Birmingham City University
ISBN 9789027256324 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
ISBN 9789027273284 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
This volume provides new insights into the nature of the Early Modern English discourse markers marry, well and why through the analysis of three corpora (A Corpus of English Dialogues, 1560-1760, the Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, and the Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English). By combining both quantitative and qualitative approaches in the study of pragmatic markers, innovative findings are reached about their distribution throughout the period 1500-1760, their attestation in different speech-related text types as well as similarities and differences in their functions. Additionally, this work engages in a sociopragmatic study, based on the sociopragmatically annotated Drama Corpus of almost a quarter of a million words, to enhance our understanding about their use by characters of different social status and gender. This volume therefore constitutes an essential piece of the puzzle in our attempt to gain a full picture of discourse marker use.

This book won the 2014 ESSE book award in English Language and Linguistics

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 227]  2012.  ix, 293 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Discourse markers
3. Methodology and data
4. The discourse markers marry, well and why
5. Quantitative analysis
6. Qualitative analysis
7. Sociopragmatic analysis
8. Conclusion
“This in-depth, scholarly treatment of several Early Modern discourse markers is unsurpassed. By incorporating social factors within its corpus method, it pushes forward the boundaries of both historical corpus linguistics and sociopragmatics.”
“Ursula Lutzky’s work perfectly fits into the still relatively new, but rapidly expanding, research fields of historical sociopragmatics and diachronic corpus linguistics, providing a systematic and innovative account of three English discourse markers. Quite aside from the valuable data collection and systematisation, the work offers exhaustive accounts of the methodologies adopted and of the increasingly large body of literature in this field. As a specialist in historical pragmatics, with an interest in the relatively elusive and classification-defying behaviour of discourse markers, I am looking forward to having this book available in the library!”
“Ursula Lutzky’s book on discourse markers in Early Modern English has an innovative approach as it uses a sociopragmatically annotated corpus as (part of) its data. The analysis works well and can serve as a model for other researchers.”
“I would recommend this book to all scholars interested in socio-historical linguistics, historical pragmatics more generally, and, of course, especially to those interested in discourse markers.”
“Overall this volume is a valuable contribution to the study of discourse markers. The quantitative and qualitative analyses based on extensive corpus material provide innovative findings about the uses of the three discourse markers and their developments over time in the Early Modern English period. The study breaks new ground in historical discourse marker studies by including the importance of text type in the analysis. Moreover the sociopragmatic analysis points to a promising direction for future historical research on discourse markers. The study of discourse markers in new contexts can also contribute to larger pragmatic issues such as ‘what we mean by discourse markers’, their multifunctionality and functional spectrum.”
“The main strength of this book is its systematicity and thoroughness. As good as every decision and comment made by the author regarding the analysis, the results, the method and material, and the theoretical framework are acknowledged and firmly anchored in a substantial background of literature; the reader is made to feel that he or she is in good hands.”
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

No author info given
2013. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED. English Language and Linguistics 17:3  pp. 601 ff. Crossref logo
Aijmer, Karin
2021. “That’s well good”: A Re-emergent Intensifier in Current British English. Journal of English Linguistics 49:1  pp. 18 ff. Crossref logo
Alonso Almeida, Francisco & Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil
2021. The discourse markers indeed, in fact, really and actually and their Spanish equivalents in economy. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 16:1  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Avila-Ledesma, Nancy E. & Carolina P. Amador-Moreno
2016.  In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ],  pp. 85 ff. Crossref logo
Brinton, Laurel J.
2015.  In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,  pp. 222 ff. Crossref logo
Claridge, Claudia
2018.  Now in the historical courtroom. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Demmen, Jane
2020. Issues and challenges in compiling a corpus of Early Modern English plays for comparison with those of William Shakespeare. ICAME Journal 44:1  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
Fedriani, Chiara & Andrea Sansó
2017.  In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
González-Díaz, Victorina
2018. Tracing The Development Of AnOld Old Story: Intensificatory Repetition In English. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:1  pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo
Hummel, Martin
2014.  In Adjectives in Germanic and Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 212],  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Khavronich, Alina Alekseevna
2020. To the question on methodology of stylistic stratification in analysis of the Early Modern English dramatic oeuvre (on the example of John Skelton’s play “Magnificence”). Litera :5  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
2015. A quantitative approach to the grammaticalization of discourse markers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:2  pp. 232 ff. Crossref logo
Kytö, Merja
2019. Register in historical linguistics. Register Studies 1:1  pp. 136 ff. Crossref logo
Leuckert, Sven & Sofia Rüdiger
2021. Discourse markers and world Englishes. World Englishes Crossref logo
Lutzky, Ursula
2019. “But it is not prov’d”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Marcus, Imogen
2018.  In The Linguistics of Spoken Communication in Early Modern English Writing,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Marcus, Imogen
2018.  In The Linguistics of Spoken Communication in Early Modern English Writing,  pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Mazzon, Gabriella
2017.  In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],  pp. 289 ff. Crossref logo
Rogos-Hebda, Justyna
2020. Visual pragmatics of abbreviations and otiose strokes in John Lydgate’sSiege of Thebes . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Chris A.
2018. Diachronic patterns of usage of no doubt in the English Historical Book Collection (EEBO, ECCO and EVANS). ExELL 6:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1  pp. 26 ff. Crossref logo
Włodarczyk, Matylda & Irma Taavitsainen
2017. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2012026170 | Marc record