Edited by Anita Fetzer
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 228] 2013
► pp. 167–190
The present discussion starts with the premise that irony positions the ironist as adversarial vis-à-vis the target of irony, and expands on the notion of ironic positioning. Drawing on a close examination of politicians’ follow-ups to direct and ironic challenges, it will be argued that the manipulation of degree of indirectness affects the politicians’ reciprocal positioning; that irony may position the addressee as accomplice of the ironist; and that due to the inherently indirect nature of ironic criticism, the addressee may legitimately ignore it, and thus negotiate second-order positioning. In this respect ironic challenges and their follow-ups differ from direct adversarial responses to direct challenges. Through the latter, the speaker accepts the adversarial first-order positioning initiated by his or her interlocutor.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.