Cover not available
Part of
Constructing Collectivity: 'We' across languages and contexts
Edited by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 239] 2014
► pp. 309–330

On the use of ‘we’ in Flemish World War II interviews

ORCID logo | University of Leuven, Belgium
This chapter focuses on the ‘we’-form and its relation to identity construction in fifteen World War II narratives elicited by interviews. First, I address this issue from a quantitative perspective by mirroring the pronominal usage of the interviewer and the interviewee and by executing a contextual referent analysis of the ‘we’-form. Second, I shift to a qualitative perspective to demonstrate the central position of the ‘we’-form in the interviewees’ construction of the collective identity of the group of deported prisoners of war. The use of the ‘we’-form is only avoided when taboo topics are being discussed. The findings thus illustrate the importance of the ‘we’-form as a marker of identity.
Published online: 27 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.20mie
References (32)
References
Alber, Jennifer, O’Connell, Daniel and Kowal, Sabine.2002. “Personal perspective in TV news interviews.” Pragmatics 12(3): 257–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena and Perlmutter-Bowen, Sheryl.2009. “The acquisition of memory by interview questioning: Holocaust re-membering as category-bound activity.” Discourse Studies 11(2): 223–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breendonk. 2011. Breendonk Memorial . Retrieved from [URL] .
Cheng, Winnie and Warren, Martin. 2003. “Indirectness, inexplicitness and vagueness made clearer.” Pragmatics 13(3): 381–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Stephen E.1992. “Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news-interview discourse.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 8], Paul Drew and John Heritage(eds), 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna. 1995. “Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse.” Text 15(3): 379–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Identity in Narrative: A study of Immigrant Discourse . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna, Schiffrin, Deborah and Bamberg, Michael.2006. “Introduction.” In Discourse and Identity [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 23], Anna De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg(eds), 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. “Footing.” Semiotica 25(1/2): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, et al.1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst . Available at: [URL] Last consulted on22February2012.
Harré, Rom.1988. “Accountability within a social order: The role of pronouns.” In Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods , Charles Antaki(ed.), 156–167. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jorissen, Tine. 2008. “Le Auffanglager Breendonk et le Polizeiliches Durchgangslager Amersfoort: Une comparaison.” Témoigner: Entre Histoire et Mémoire 100 (July-September): 99–110.Google Scholar
Labov, Willam and Waletzky, Joshua.1966. “Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts , June Helm(ed.), 12–44. Seattle: Universiy of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lammers, Henk. 2001. “Het gebruik van we/wij in medewerker-cliëntgesprekken bij de sociale dienst.” Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 23(3): 218–235.Google Scholar
Leudar, Ivan, Marsland, Victoria and Nekvapil, Jiri.2004. “On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse.” Discourse & Society 15(2–3): 243–266.
Levinson, Stephen C.1983. Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Louwagie, Fransiska. 2007. Le Témoignage Francophone sur les Camps de Concentration Nazis (1945 - 2004): Une Étude Générique et Discursive . Leuven: KU Leuven PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.2001. “Discourse and semantics.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis , Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi Hamilton(eds), 76–99. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. “Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3): 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, Camelia, O’Connell, Daniel and Kowal, Sabine.2002. “ ‘If you and I, if we, in this later day, lose that sacred fire…’: Perspectives in political interviews.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31(3): 269–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, Martina. this volume. “«Nail polish – we’ve chosen the nicest shades for you!»: Editorial voice and ‘we’ in a Flemish women’s magazine.” In Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts , Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou(ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Urban, Greg1988. “The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse.” Multilingua 7(1/2): 67–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Dorien.2005. “An integrated approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis in the study of identity in speeches.” Discourse & Society 16(1): 107–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Dorien and Bruyninckx, Kris.2009. “The influence of the interviewing style and the historical context on positioning shifts in the narrative of a Second World War resistance member.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(2): 169–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Dorien and Louwagie, Fransiska.2012. “Pronominagebruik en identiteit in Nederlandstalige deportatieverhalen uit het Breendonkcorpus.” Getuigen: Tussen Geschiedenis en Gedachtenis 114: 130–143.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, Carel. 2000. Toetsende Statistiek – Basistechnieken: Een Praktijkgerichte Inleiding voor Onderzoekers van Taal, Gedrag en Communicatie . Bussum: Uitgeverij Coutinho.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret and Maybin, Janet.1996. “The distributed self: A social constructionist perspective.” In Understanding the Self , Richard Stevens(ed.), 219–279. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zupnik, Yael J.1994. “A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 21: 339–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
2017. “We are going to our Portuguese homeland!”. Narrative Inquiry 27:2 ► pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
2019. “We are going to our Portuguese homeland!”. In Storytelling in the Digital World [Benjamins Current Topics, 104], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.