Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context
Edited by Fabienne H. Baider and Georgeta Cislaru
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 241] 2014
► pp. 279–308

Verbal aggressiveness or cooperative support?

Emotion communication in French and Italian professional contexts

| Flinders University, Australia
| Flinders University, Australia
This chapter discusses some preliminary results obtained as part of a broader investigation, which examines whether and how the communication of emotion differs in relation to three cultural groups (French, Italian and Anglo-Australian), with implications for intercultural communication. In particular, we focus here on how conflict talk operates in business meetings in Italian and French companies. Strategies of adjustment and control mechanisms between participants normally ensure that a meeting unfolds with respect to certain interactional rules and cultural norms that members of a given culture implicitly adopt. While anecdotal evidence abounds on the differences in conversational styles among the three groups we consider, empirical research exploring the deployment of affect in conflict discourse from a cross-cultural perspective is scarce.This paper illustrates instances of verbal conflict arising from challenges to the Chair’ s authority and power struggle, as manifested by interruptions and topic management sequences. This investigation of the pragmatic significance of interruptions in conflict talk contributes to research on emotional speech from a multidisciplinary (Mozziconacci 2002) and cross-cultural perspective (Scherer et al. 2001a; Rilliard et al. 2009).
Published online: 13 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.241.17hop
References

References

Argyle, Michael, Monika Henderson, Michael Bond, Yuichi Iizuka, and Alberta Contarello
1986 “Cross-cultural variations in relationship rules.” International Journal of Psychology 21: 287–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, Blake E., and Humphrey, Ronald H.
1995 “Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal.” Human Relations 48: 97–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca, and Sandra Harris
1995 “Towards the generic structure of meeting in British and Italian managements.” Text 15(4): 531–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Managing Language. The Discourse of Corporate Meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2001 Le Facce del Parlare. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Béal, Christine
1990 “It’s all in the asking: A perspective on problems of cross-cultural communication between native speakers of French and native speakers of Australian English in the workplace.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics series S7: 16–32.Google Scholar
1992 “Did you have a good weekend? Or why there is no such thing as a simple question in cross-cultural encounters.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 23–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonaiuto Marino, Castellana Elio, and Pierro Antonio
2003 “Arguing and laughing: The use of humor to negotiate in group discussions.” Humor 16 (2): 183–223.Google Scholar
Brislin, Richard W., Kenneth Cushner, Craig Cherrie, and Mahealani Yong
1986 Intercultural Interactions: A Practical Guide. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia, and Richard W. Janney
1994 “Towards a pragmatics of emotive communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 325–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, William A., and Thomas A. Rizzo
1990 “Disputes in the peer culture of American and Italian nursery-school children.” In Conflict Talk, ed. by Allen D. Grimshaw, 21–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio R.
1999 The Feeling of What Happens. Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
Edelsky, Carole
1981 “Who’s got the floor?” Language in Society 10(3): 383–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fele, Giolo
1991 L’insorgere del conflitto. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Frijda, Nico H.
1993 “The place of appraisal in emotion”. Cognition and Emotion 7(3/4): 357–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gesteland, Richard R.
1999 Cross-Cultural Business Behavior: Marketing, Negotiating, and Managing Across Cultures. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
Giovannini, Dino, and Pio Ricci-Bitti
1986 “The Italian case: A stereotype confirmed?” In Experiencing Emotion, ed. by Klaus R. Scherer, Harald G. Walbott, and Angela B. Summerfield, 211–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Julia A.
1990 “Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power- and rapport-oriented acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(6): 883–903. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie
Harness 1983 “Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 7(6): 657–677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen D.
(ed) 1990 Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas
1992 “The linguistic realization of face management: Implications of language production and comprehension, person perception, and cross-cultural communication.” Social Psychology Quarterly 55(2): 141–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izard, Carroll
1977 Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kakava, Christina
2002 “Opposition in Modern Greek discourse: Cultural and contextual constraints.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1537–1568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David A., and Jennifer J. Peck
1995 “Troubled waters: Arguments as sociability revisited.” Language in Society 24: 29–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Christoph
1997 Arbeitsbesprechungen: Interaktionstruktur, Interaktionadynamiek und Konsequenzen einer Sozialen Form. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mozziconacci, Sylvie J.- L.
2002 “Prosody and emotions.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, ed. by Bernard Bel, and Isabelle Marlien, 1–9. Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
Murata, Kumiko
1994 “Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption.” Journal of Pragmatics 21(4): 385–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal, and Spitz Alice
2008 “Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 40(10): 1661–1686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nosfinger, Robert E.
1991 Everyday Conversation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Orletti, Franca
1998 “Sulla superficie del conflitto.” In Fra Conversazione e Discorso, ed. by F. Orletti, 171–184. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Piazza, Roberta
2006 “The representation of conflict in the discourse of Italian melodrama.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (12), 2087–2104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rilliard, Albert, Takaaki Shochi, Jean-Claude Martin, Donna Erickson, and Véronique Aubergé
2009 “Multimodal indices to Japanese and French prosodically expressed social affects.” Language & Speech 52(2/3): 223–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks,Harvey
, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson 1974 “A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant K., and Stefaan Slembrouck
1992 “Non-cooperation in communication: A reassessment of Gricean pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 17(2): 117–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “Preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language 53: 362–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherer Klaus R., Angela Schorr, and Tom Johnstone
(eds) 2001a Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer Klaus R., Rainer Banse, and Harald G. Walbott
2001b “Emotion inferences from vocal expression correlate across languages and cultures.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(1): 76–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schriffrin, Deborah
1984 “Jewish argument as sociability.” Language in Society 13: 311–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John MacHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard
1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Nancy L., and Elizabeth R. Albro
2001 “The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation.” Discourse Processes 32 (2–3): 113–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Katherine A., and Madeline M. Maxwell
2010 Storied Conflict Talk: Narrative Construction in Mediation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strambi, Antonella, and Colette Mrowa-Hopkins
2007 “Towards the formulation of cultural scripts related to the communication of anger: An analysis framework.” In Confidence/Confiding. Dévoilement de Soi dans l'Interaction, ed. by Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni, and Véronique Traverso, 426–445. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1981 “Indirectness in discourse: Ethnicity as conversational style.” Discourse Processes 4(3): 221–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Testa, Renata
1988 “Interruptive strategies in English and Italian conversation: smooth versus contrastive linguistic preferences.” Multilingua 7(3): 285–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vuchinich, Samuel
1990 “The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict.” In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. by Allen Grimshaw, 118–138. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, Candace
1979 “Against our will: Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversations”. In Language, Sex and Gender, ed. by Judith Orasanu, Mariam K. Slater, and Leonore Loeb Adler, 81–97. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2003 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar