The role of negative-modal synergies in Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species
This chapter explores the role of negative-modal synergies in the expression of authorial stance and intersubjective positioning in Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. As markers of stance, both negation and modality contribute to the expression of evaluation in discourse, though little attention has been paid to the co-occurrence of both types of markers. Drawing on corpus-based methods, I first identify the recurrent discourse pattern which gives rise to a semantic prosody of negative-modal meaning throughout The Origin of Species as compared to Voyage of the Beagle. Second, I discuss how this discourse pattern reflects Darwin’s positioning in the presentation of his Theory of Natural Selection. An analysis of the resources which express intersubjective positioning reveals the tension between conflicting goals in Darwin’s presentation of his new theory, namely, the expression of certainty regarding his insights and discoveries and the need to be cautious in communicating them. Thus, the various patterns of (co)-occurrence of negation, modality and personal pronouns construe specific authorial positions against the backdrop of competing scientific theories and in anticipation of readers’ potential disagreement.
References (30)
References
Beer, Gillian. 1983/2009. Darwin’s Plots. Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth Century Fiction (3rd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig and Leech, Geoffrey. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondi, Marina and Scott, Michael (eds). 2010. Keyness in Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Joanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Darwin, Charles.1839. The Voyage of the Beagle. Accessed at The Online Literature Library (literature.org) [accessed 1
st
May 2010]
[URL]
.
Darwin, Charles.1859. The Origin of Species. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. Accessed at The Online Literature Library (literature.org) [accessed 1
st
May 2010]
[URL]
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Downing, Angela and Locke, Philip. 2006. English Grammar: A University Course (2nd edition). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John. 2007. “The stance triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, Robert Englebretson (ed), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1993. English Grammar. A Functional Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edition). London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura. 2000. Negation, Text Worlds and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Stanford: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoey, Michael, Mahlberg, Michaela, Stubbs, Michael and Teubert, Wolfgang. 2007. Text, Discourse, Corpora: Theory and Analysis. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and Modality in English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordan, Michael. P. 1998. “The power of negation. Text, context and relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (6): 705–752. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics (I and II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J.R. and Veel, Robert (eds). 1998. Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology. Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. The University of Wisconsin Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, Greg. 1994. “Narratives of science and nature in popularizing moleculargenetics.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard (ed), 179–190. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagano, Adriana. 1994. “Negatives in written text.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard (ed), 250–265. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and Modality in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rayson, Paul. 2008. “Wmatrix: A web-based Corpus Processing Environment”. Lancaster: Computing Department. Lancaster University.
[URL]
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, John McH. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teubert, Wolfgang. 2010a. “Things happen to arise: Natural selection, a story of success or failure?” PG Talk at the University of Birmingham. April 2010.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teubert, Wolfgang. 2010b. Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Geoff and Hunston, Susan. 2000. “Evaluation: an introduction”. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Geoff. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd edition). London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tottie, Gunnel. 1991. Negation in English Speech and Writing: A Study in Variation. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds. Representing Conceptual Worlds in Discourse. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Jiménez-Pazos, Bárbara
2021.
Darwin’s perception of nature and the question of disenchantment: a semantic analysis across the six editions of On the Origin of Species.
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43:2
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Pazos, Bárbara Jiménez
2018.
The Deteleologization of Nature: Darwin’s Language inOn the Origin of Species.
Metaphysica 19:2
► pp. 185 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Yasra Hanawi
2017.
Bush and Obama’s Addresses to the Arab World: Recontextualizing Stance in Political Discourse. In
Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres [
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 5],
► pp. 187 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.