Cover not available
Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 281–302

Exploring academic argumentation in course-related blogs through ENGAGEMENT

This study uses a functional linguistic framework, the system of ENGAGEMENT (Martin and White 2005), to explore academic argumentation in course-related blogs from the standpoint of the ways in which blog writers make space for new knowledge against the background of other knowers’ ideas and ways they support their claims with evidence. The results reveal a significant presence of strategies typical of academic reasoning and suggest that it is a pattern of alternation between expanding and contracting options that lies behind more successful arguments. These findings tentatively confirm the conduciveness of the blog medium for practicing academic argumentation and point out the significance of the ENGAGEMENT framework as an analytical approach to academic argumentation and its usefulness for scaffolding learner argumentative writing.
Published online: 4 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.14rys
References (56)
References
Al-Fadda, Hind and Al-Yahya, Maha. 2010. “Using web blogs as a tool to encourage pre-class reading, post-class reflections and collaboration in higher education.” US-China Education Review 7 (7): 100–106.Google Scholar
Andrews, Richard. 2000. Introduction: Learning to argue in higher education. In Learning to Argue in Higher Education, Sally Mitchell and Richard Andrew (eds), 1–14. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
2005. “Models of argumentation in educational discourse.” Text 25 (1): 107–127.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (Vern McGee, Trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barton, Ellen. 1993. “Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance.” College English 5 (7): 745–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. “Contrastive and non-contrastive connectives: Metadiscourse functions in argumentation.” Written Communication 12 (2): 219–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles. 1992. “From cultural criticism to disciplinary participation: living with powerful words.” In Writing, Teaching and Learning in the Disciplines, Anne Herrington and Charles Moran (eds), 61–68. New York: Modern Languages Association.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol and Huckin, Thomas. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloch, Joel. 2007. “Abdullah's blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere.” Language Learning and Technology 11: 128–128.Google Scholar
Bloch, Joel and Crosby, Cathryn. 2008. “Blogging and academic writing development.” In Computer-enhanced Language Acquisition and Learning, Felicia Zhang and Beth Barber (eds), 36–47. Hershey/New York: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace and Nichols, Johanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chandrasegaran, Antonia and Kong, Kah Mun. 2006. “Stance-taking and stance-support in students' online forum discussion.” Linguistics and Education 17: 374–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Peichin and Schleppegrell, Mary. 2011. “Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10: 140–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, Frances and Martin, J.R. (eds). 1997. Genre and Institutions. Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline and Hewings, Ann. 2004. “IELTS as preparation for tertiary writing: distinctive interpersonal and textual strategies.” In Analysing Academic Writing, Louise Ravelli and Robert Ellis (eds), 153–171. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005. “Engaging electronically: Using CMC to develop students' argumentation skills in higher education.” Language and Education 19: 32–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Çuhadar, Cem and Kuzu, A. 2010. “Improving interaction through blogs in a constructivist learning environment.” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 11 (1): 134–161.Google Scholar
Ferdig, Richard and Trammell, Kaye. 2004. “Content delivery in the 'Blogosphere'.” Technological Horizons in Education Journal 31, [URL] (accessed 4 March 2011).Google Scholar
Groom, Nick. 2000. “'A workable balance': Self and sources in argumentative writing.” In Learning to Argue in Higher Education, Sally Mitchell and Richard Andrew (eds), 65–73. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1993. “Towards a language-based theory of learning.” Linguistics and Education 5: 93–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hernández-Ramos, Pedro. 2004. “Web logs and online discussions as tools to promote reflective practice.” The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3, Accessed March 4th 2011 from [URL] Google Scholar
Hewings, Ann. 2004. “Developing discipline-specific writing: An analysis of undergraduate geography essays.” In Analysing Academic Writing, Louise Ravelli and Robert Ellis (eds), 131–152. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hood, Sue. 2010. Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2005. Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kelley, Mary J. 2008. The Impact of Weblogs on the Affective States and Academic Writing of L2 Undergraduates. Charlottesville, VA: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Christopher and Dion, Michelle. 2010. “Blogging in the political science classroom.” Political Science and Politics 43: 151–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1988. “Genres, semantics, and classroom education.” Linguistics and Education 1: 81–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Charles and Williams, Terra. 2004. “Moving to the public: Weblogs in the writing classroom.” In Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs Laura J. Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff, and Jessica Reyman (eds), accessed March 4th 2011: [URL] .Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R. 2005). The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sally. 1994. The Teaching and Learning of Argument in Sixth Forms and Higher Education, Final Report. Hull: Center for Studies in Rhetoric, School of Education, University of Hull.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sally and Andrews, Richard (eds). 2000. Learning to Argue in Higher Education. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook.Google Scholar
Murray, Liam, Hourigan, Tríona and Jeanneau, Catherine. 2007. “Blog writing integration for academic language learning purposes: towards an assessment framework.” Ibérica 14: 9–9.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 2010. The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Oravec, Jo Ann. 2002. “Bookmarking the world: Weblog applications in education.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 45: 616–616.Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul. 2005. “Toward the ethnography of argumentation: A response to Richard Andrews' 'Models of argumenation in educational discourse'.” Text 25 (1): 129–144.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Will. 2003. “Web logs in the English Classroom: More than just chat.” English Journal 93: 39–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, Marianna and Kugele, Jens. 2011. “Blogs, a medium for intellectual engagement with course readings and participants.” In Georgetown Roundtable of Linguistics (GURT), Deborah Tannen and Anna Marie Trester (eds), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary J. 2004a. “Technical writing in a second language: The role of grammatical metaphor.” In Analysing Academic Writing, Louise Ravelli and Robert Ellis (eds), 172–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004b. The Language of Schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Swain, Merrill. 2006. “Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency.” In Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, Heidi Byrnes (ed), 95–108. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2001. “Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 58–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H. (ed). 2001. Crucial Concepts in Argumenation Theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev. 1987. “Thinking and speech.” In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, Robert W. Rieber and Aaron S. Carton (eds), 39–285. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. (Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner and Ellen Souberman, eds) Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jill. 2005. “Weblogs: Learning in public.” On the Horizon 13: 112–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jenny and Fang, Yuehchiu. 2005. “Benefits of cooperative learning in weblog networks.” Online submission on the ERIC database, accessed March 4th 2010 from [URL] Google Scholar
Williams, Jeremy and Jacobs, Joanne. 2004. “Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector.” Australasian Journal of Educaitonal Technology 20: 232–232.Google Scholar
Wu, Siew Mei. 2006. “Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance: Investigating the strategy of problematization in students' argumentation.” RELC 37 (3): 329–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Siew Mei and Allison, Desmond. 2005. “Evaluative expressions in analytical arguments: Aspects of appraisal in assigned English language essays.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 2 (1): 105–127.Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Xuan, Winfred Wenhui & Shukun Chen
2024. Writing to evaluate. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Roca de Larios, Julio
2023. Chapter 10. Exploring the generation, development, and integration of argumentative goals in L1 and L2 composition processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Valerdi Zárate, Julio César
2023. Evaluative language in undergraduate academic writing: expressions of attitude as sources of text effectiveness in English as a Foreign Language. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Zhang, Lu & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2023. Improving EFL students’ stance-taking in academic writing with SFL-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Zhang, Lu & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2023. Development and validation of the questionnaire on EFL students’ perceptions of authorial stance in academic writing. Applied Linguistics Review 14:5 ► pp. 1219 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Lu, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Ting Sophia Xu
2023. Effects of teacher explicit instruction in stance-taking on students’ perceptions of stance and on their academic writing beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Kamijo, Takeshi
2022. ‘Many arguments’: L2 postgraduate students’ task representations in critical reading and argumentation for MA essay assignments. International Journal of English for Academic Purposes: Research and Practice 2022:Spring ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Cheung, Yin Ling & Tze Hui Low
2019. Pre-university Students’ Voice Construction in Argumentative Essays. RELC Journal 50:2 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Oskoz, Ana, Ana Gimeno-Sanz & Ana Sevilla-Pavón
2018. Examining L2 Learners' Use of Engagement Strategies in Telecollaborative Written Interactions. In Multilingual Writing and Pedagogical Cooperation in Virtual Learning Environments [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
McCabe, Anne
2017. Knowledge and interaction in on-line discussions in Spanish by advanced language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning 30:5 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Oskoz, Ana & Olimpia Pérez‐Broncano
2016. What Did You Say? How Did You Say It? Linguistics Choices in Online Discussions. Foreign Language Annals 49:4 ► pp. 772 ff. DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg
2015. Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.