Cover not available
Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 303–320

Multimodal analysis of controversy in the media

ORCID logo
In a world dominated by the Internet, it is becoming increasingly important to develop analytical tools that can take in multiple dimensions of media texts. This chapter presents a multimodal analysis of a corpus of online news­paper texts about controversies surrounding the wearing of religious items by Muslims, Sikhs and Christians, which received considerable media coverage in Britain in early 2010. Although the text itself generally provides a balanced account of the issues, a comparison of the results across modes shows that the groups are evaluated differently in visual images, headlines and direct quotations. This study represents a step on the road to devising an integrative model for multimodal analysis.
Published online: 4 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.15bre
References (26)
References
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Burger, Harald. 2008. “Das idiomatische ‘Bild’ und seine Modifikationen durch materielle Bilder – theoretische und empirische Aspekte.” In Beiträge zur Phraseologie aus textueller Sicht, Carmen Mellado Blanco (ed), 89–113. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. 1984. Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998. “Front pages: (the critical) analysis of newspaper layout.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, Alan Bell and Peter Garrett (eds), 186–219. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001. Multimodal Discourse. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Lim Fei, Victor. 2004. “Developing an integrative multisemiotic model.” In Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives, Kay O’Halloran (ed), 220–246. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Liu, Yu and O’Halloran, Kay. 2009. “Intersemiotic texture: analysing cohesive devices between language and images.” Social Semiotics 19 (4): 367–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maher, T. Michael. 2001. “Framing: an emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World, Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant (eds), 83–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and Rose, David. 2003. Working with Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messaris, Paul and Abraham, Linus. 2001. “The role of images in framing news stories.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World, Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant (eds), 215–226. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Naciscione, Anita. 2010. “Visual representation of phraseological image.” In Yearbook of Phraseology, Koenraad Kuiper (ed), Vol. 1, 19–43. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay (ed). 2004. Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kay and Meinhof, Ulrike. 1999. Worlds in Common. Television Discourse in a Changing Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rojecki, Andrew. 2005. “Media discourse on globalization and terror.” Political Communication 22: 63–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry D. 1998. “Synergy on the page: exploring inter-semiotic complementarity in page-based multi-modal text.” JASFL Occasional Papers 1 (1): 25–49.Google Scholar
2007. “Inter-semiotic complementarity: a framework for multi-modal discourse analysis.” In New Directions in the Analysis of Multi-modal Discourse, Terry Royce and Wendy Bowcher (eds), 63–109. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut. 2004. Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache. Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text. Konzepte, Theorien, Analysemethoden. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Sprache-Bild-Texte lesen. Bausteine zur Methodik einer Grundkompetenz.” In Bildlinguistik, Hajo Diekmannshenke, Michael Klemm and Hartmut Stöckl (eds), 43–70. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Filmer, Denise
2021. Salvini, stereotypes and cultural translation: analysing anglophone news discourse on Italy’s ‘little Mussolini’. Language and Intercultural Communication 21:3 ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Watanabe, Hideo
2021. The discursive construction of the international dispute over the East China Sea: A multimodal analysis of evaluations in online newspaper editorials in the Chinese and Japanese press. Media Asia 48:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.