Article published in:
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 303320


Barthes, Roland.
1977Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Burger, Harald.
2008“Das idiomatische ‘Bild’ und seine Modifikationen durch materielle Bilder – theoretische und empirische Aspekte.” In Beiträge zur Phraseologie aus textueller Sicht, Carmen Mellado Blanco (ed), 89–113. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O.
1984Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M.
1993“Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken.
2005“Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse.Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo.
1996Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998“Front pages: (the critical) analysis of newspaper layout.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, Alan Bell and Peter Garrett (eds), 186–219. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001Multimodal Discourse. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Lim Fei, Victor.
2004“Developing an integrative multisemiotic model.” In Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives, Kay O’Halloran (ed), 220–246. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Liu, Yu and O’Halloran, Kay.
2009“Intersemiotic texture: analysing cohesive devices between language and images.Social Semiotics 19 (4): 367–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maher, T.
Michael 2001“Framing: an emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World, Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant (eds), 83–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and Rose, David.
2003Working with Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R.
2005The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Messaris, Paul and Abraham, Linus.
2001“The role of images in framing news stories.” In Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding of the Social World, Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant (eds), 215–226. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Naciscione, Anita.
2010Visual representation of phraseological image.” In Yearbook of Phraseology, Koenraad Kuiper (ed), Vol. 1, 19–43. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay
(ed) 2004Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kay and Meinhof, Ulrike.
1999Worlds in Common. Television Discourse in a Changing Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richardson, John.
2004(Mis)representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rojecki, Andrew.
2005“Media discourse on globalization and terror.Political Communication 22: 63–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry D.
1998“Synergy on the page: exploring inter-semiotic complementarity in page-based multi-modal text.JASFL Occasional Papers 1 (1): 25–49.Google Scholar
2007“Inter-semiotic complementarity: a framework for multi-modal discourse analysis.” In New Directions in the Analysis of Multi-modal Discourse, Terry Royce and Wendy Bowcher (eds), 63–109. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut.
2004Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache. Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text. Konzepte, Theorien, Analysemethoden. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010“Sprache-Bild-Texte lesen. Bausteine zur Methodik einer Grundkompetenz.” In Bildlinguistik, Hajo Diekmannshenke, Michael Klemm and Hartmut Stöckl (eds), 43–70. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun.
1988News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1991Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.Google Scholar