Part of
Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243] 2014
► pp. 326
References (67)
References
Corpora and electronic resources
Brown Corpus = A Standard Corpus of Present-day Edited American English, for Use with Digital Computers . 1964, 1971, 1979. Compiled by W. Nelson Francis, and Henry Ku?era. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
COHA = The Corpus of Historical American English . 2010–. Compiled by Mark Davies. Online: [URL] .
CoRD = Corpus Research Database. 2007–. Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English, University of Helsinki. Online: [URL] .
A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 . 2006. Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). More information: [URL] .
The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts , version 3.0 (CLMET3.0). 2013. Compiled by Hendrik De Smet, Hans-Jürgen Diller, and Jukka Tyrkkö. More information: [URL] .
ECCO = Eighteenth Century Collections Online . 2003–2009. Detroit: Gale Cengage Learning. More information: [URL] .
EEBO = Early English Books Online . 2003–. ProQuest LLC. Online: [URL] .
EMEMT = Early Modern English Medical Texts . 2010. Compiled by Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, Martti Mäkinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkkö, with the assistance of Alpo Honkapohja, Anu Lehto, and Raisa Oinonen. Published on CD-ROM in Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies , ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts . 1991. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki. More information: [URL] .
Late Modern English Medical Texts . Forthcoming. Compiled by Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Anu Lehto, Ville Marttila, Raisa Oinonen, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkkö. More information: [URL] .
London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English . 1980, 1991. Compiled by Jan Svartvik, Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, and Knut Hofland. Survey of English Usage, University College London, and Survey of Spoken English, Lund University. More information: [URL] .
Middle English Compendium . 2006. University of Michigan Digital Library Production Service. Online: [URL] .
Ngram Viewer . Online: [URL] .
OED = Oxford English Dictionary . 1989–. 3rd ed. in progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: [URL] .
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography . 2004–. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: [URL] .
Secondary sources
Aarts, Jan. 2011. “Corpus Analysis.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: 2011 Installment , ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Christian Rühleman. Forthcoming. Corpus Pragmatics: Exploring Speaker Meaning in Computer Corpora . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logo
Aitchison, Jean. 2012. “Diachrony vs Synchrony: The Complementary Evolution of Two (Ir)reconcilable Dimensions.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics , ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy, and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 11–21. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 2011. “Corpus-based Pragmatics I: Qualitative Studies.” In Foundations of Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 1), ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal R. Norrick, 587–627. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn. 2005. Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640– 1760) . (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 135.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn, and Jonathan Culpeper. 2003. “Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics.” In Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech , ed. by Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson, and Tony McEnery, 37–58. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Identifying Key Sociophilological Usage in Plays and Trial Proceedings (1640–1760): An Empirical Approach via Corpus Annotation.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10 (2): 286–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Dawn, Jonathan Culpeper, and Mark Davies. 2008. “Pragmatic Annotation.” In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook , vol. 1, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, 613–641. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baron, Alistair, and Paul Rayson. 2009. “Automatic Standardisation of Texts Containing Spelling Variation: How Much Training Data Do You Need?” In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, CL2009 , University of Liverpool, UK, 20–23 July 2009, ed. by Michaela Mahlberg, Victorina González-Díaz, and Catherine Smith. Online: [URL] .Google Scholar
Bergner, Heinz. 1995. “The Openness of Medieval Texts.” In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 37–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander, and Laurel J. Brinton (eds). 2012. English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook . (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 34.1.) Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F. 1979. The English Language in Medieval Literature . London: Methuen.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Shakespeare’s Informal English and Modern Punctuation.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 46: 99–112.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich, and Beatrix Busse. 2010. “Shakespeare.” In Historical Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 8), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 247–281. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich, and Axel Hübler (eds). 2012. Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics . (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 220.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo, and Juan M. Hernández-Campoy. 2012. “Introduction.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics , ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy, and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 1–8. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. “The Metalanguage of impoliteness: Using Sketch Engine to Explore the Oxford English Corpus.” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (Contemporary Studies in Linguistics), ed. by Paul Baker, 64–86. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen, Hendrik de Smet, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2011. “A European Database of Descriptors of English Electronic Texts.” The European English Messenger 19 (2): 29–35.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. “Philology, Linguistics, and the Discourse of the Medieval Text.” Speculum 65 (1): 19–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleßgen, Martin-Dietrich. 2005. “Diskurstraditionen zwischen pragmatischen Vorgaben und sprachlichen Varietäten: Methodische Überlegungen zur historischen Korpuslinguistik.” In Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik in den romanischen Sprachen , ed. by Angela Schrott and Harald Völker, 207–228. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Honkapohja, Alpo, Samuli Kaislaniemi, and Ville Marttila. 2009. “Digital Editions for Corpus Linguistics: Representing Manuscript Reality in Electronic Corpora.” In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 68), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, 451–475. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Huang. Yan. 2012. “Introduction: What Is Pragmatics?” In The Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics , ed. by Yan Huang, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andreas, and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics.” In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 3–33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. 1979. “The Alterity and Modernity of Medieval Literature.” New Literary History 10 (2): 181–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasi?ski (eds). 2004. Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. “Pragmatics in the History of Linguistic Thought.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics , ed. by Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 495–512. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (ed.). 1995. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English . (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen, and Barb Breustedt. 2008. “Fishing for Compliments: Precision and Recall in Corpus-linguistic Compliment Research.” In Speech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 273–294. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Pragmatic Variables.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics , ed. by Juan M. Hernández-Campoy, and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 293–306. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Irma Taavitsainen, and Gerold Schneider. 2012. “Semantic Corpus Trawling: Expressions of ‘Courtesy’ and ‘Politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus.” In Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11), ed. by Carla Suhr, and Irma Taavitsainen. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Online: [URL] .
Kay, Christian, Jane Roberts, Michael Samuels, and Irené Wotherspoon (eds). 2009. Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. “Tracing Directives through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-based Diachronic Speech-act Analysis.” In Speech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 295–310. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LALME = A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English, 1350–1450. 1986. Ed. by Angus McIntosh, M.L. Samuels, and Michael Benskin. Aberdeen/Edinburgh: Aberdeen University Press and Mercat Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change: On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English . (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 55.) Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
The Riverside Chaucer . 1987. Ed. by Larry D. Benson. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
The Riverside Shakespeare . 1997. Ed. by G. Blakemore Evans. 2nd ed. Boston, MA/New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2008. “Introduction: Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics – A Mutualistic Entente.” In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente (Mouton Series in Pragmatics 2), ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 1–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrott, Angela, and Harald Völker. 2005. “Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik: Traditionen, Methoden und Modelle in der Romanistik.” In Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik in den romanischen Sprachen , ed. by Angela Schrott and Harald Völker, 1–22. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Suhr, Carla, and Irma Taavitsainen (eds). 2012. Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics . (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11.) Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Online: [URL] .
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1988. Middle English Lunaries: A Study of the Genre . (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 47.) Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics (Topics in English Linguistics 52), ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 11–36. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge, and Jeremy Smith (eds). Forthcoming. Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008. “The State of English Language Studies: A Linguistic Perspective.” In ENGLISH NOW: Selected Papers from the 20th IAUPE Conference in Lund 2007 , ed. by Marianne Thormählen, 199–225. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2005. Regularity in Semantic Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valkonen, Petteri. 2008. “Showing a Little Promise: Identifying and Retrieving Explicit Illocutionary Acts from a Corpus of Written Prose.” In Speech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 247–272. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics . London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Lázaro Gutiérrez, Raquel
2024. Methodological Challenges of Multimodal Corpus Analysis of Interpreter-Mediated Conversations. In Artificial Intelligence in HCI [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14735],  pp. 424 ff. DOI logo
Palander-Collin, Minna & Minna Nevala
2024. Chapter 1. Self- and other-reference in social contexts. In Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 342],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Seoane, Elena & Lucía Loureiro-Porto
2024. A diachronic corpus-pragmatic approach to democratization. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Aijmer, Karin
2023. Corpus Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context,  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo
2022. Chapter 6. Towards a local grammar of stance expression in Late Modern English medical writing. In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330],  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo & Irma Taavitsainen
2022. Chapter 1. Corpora, pragmatics, and historical medical discourse. In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Walker, Terry & Merja Kytö
2022. Chapter 5. Survival or death. In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330],  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Gerstenberg, Annette & Carine Skupien-Dekens
2021. A Grammar of Authority?. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Taavitsainen, Irma
2021. Medical book reviews 1665–1800. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22:2  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021. Language and Social Minds, DOI logo
Evans, Mel
2020. Royal Voices, DOI logo
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2020. Text-organizing metadiscourse. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:1  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Su, Hang
2020. Local grammars and diachronic speech act analysis. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Yongping Ran
2019. Globalisation and Politeness: A Chinese Perspective. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness,  pp. 280 ff. DOI logo
Archer, Dawn
2017. Context and historical (socio-)pragmatics twenty years on. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Lutzky, Ursula & Andrew Kehoe
2017. “I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Włodarczyk, Matylda & Irma Taavitsainen
2017. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara
2016. DiSCIS: A new sociolinguistic and pragmatic corpus of Plautus’ comedies. Pallas :102  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker
2015. Twenty years of historical pragmatics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph & Karin Aijmer
2014. Corpus pragmatics: laying the foundations. In Corpus Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.