Article published in:
Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243] 2014
► pp. 189212
References
Aijmer, Karin
2009Seem and Evidentiality.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 63–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary
1898 Ed. by Joseph Bosworth, and T. Northcote Toller. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Asudeh, Ash, and Ida Toivonen
2005“Copy Raising and Its Consequences for Perceptual Reports.” In Architectures, Rules, and Preferences: A Festschrift for Joan Bresnan , ed. by Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling, Chris Manning, Jane Simpson, and Annie Zaenen, 1–19. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2006“Expletives and the Syntax and Semantics of Copy Raising.” In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference , ed. by Miriam Butt, and Tracy Holloway King, n.p. Stanford, CA: CSLI. Online: http://​csli​-publications​.stanford​.edu​/LFG​/11​/lfg06asudehtoivonen​.pdf .
Bergh, Gunnar, and Aimo Seppänen
1994“Subject Extraction in English: The Use of the that-complementizer.” In English Historical Linguistics 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics , ed. by Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster, and Juan José Calvo, 131–143. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2007“Complement-taking Predicates: Usage and Linguistic Structure.” Studies in Language 31 (3): 569–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Mads Poulsen
2011“Complementizer Deletion in Spoken Danish.” Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, La Rioja, September 2011.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
CED
= A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 2006Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). More information: http://​www​.engelska​.uu​.se​/Research​/English​_Language​/Research​_Areas​/Electronic​_Resource​_Projects​/A​_Corpus​_of​_English​_Dialogues/ .
COCA
= Corpus of Contemporary American English 2008– Compiled by Mark Davies. Online: http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/ .
Dehé, Nicole, and Yordanka Kavalova
(eds) 2007 Parentheticals . Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, and Anne Wichmann
2010“Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic Evidence for Use as Main Clause, Comment Clause and Discourse Marker.” Studies in Language 34 (1): 36–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger, and Michael Tomasello
2001“The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 97–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DOEC
= Dictionary of Old English Corpus 2004Project leader: Antonette diPaolo Healey. Toronto: University of Toronto. More information: http://​www​.doe​.utoronto​.ca/ .
Elmer, Willy
1981 Diachronic Grammar: The History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions . Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1990a“Finite Complement Clauses in Shakespeare’s English I.” Studia Neophilologica 62 (1): 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990b“Finite Complement Clauses in Shakespeare’s English II.” Studia Neophilologica 62 (2): 129–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward, and Douglas Biber
1995That and Zero Complementisers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990.” In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description , ed. by Bas Aarts, and Charles F. Meyer, 241–257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2007 Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas, and Jasper Holmes
2007“A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance.” English Language and Linguistics 11 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
HC = The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts 1991 Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki. More information: http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/CoRD​/corpora​/HelsinkiCorpus​/index​.html .
Herbst, Thomas
2004 A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
et al 2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2007“Spoken Parentheticals in English: A Taxonomy.” In Parentheticals , ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 25–52. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011“Explaining Diverging Evidence: The Case of Clause-initial I think.” In Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research , ed. by Doris Schönefeld, 81–112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine, and Tania Kuteva
2011“On Thetical Grammar.” Studies in Language 35 (4): 848–893. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2003 Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I think. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Kate
2007“Epistemic Verbs and Zero Complementizer.” English Language and Linguistics 11 (3): 475–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirch, Max S
1959“Scandinavian Influence on English Syntax.” PMLA 74 (5): 503–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José
1996a“On the History of methinks: From Impersonal Construction to Fossilized Expression.” Folia Linguistica Historica 17: 153–169.Google Scholar
1996bThat/Zero Variation in Restoration English.” In English Historical Linguistics 1994 , ed. by Derek Britton, 271–286. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José, and Belén Méndez-Naya
2012a“On the Use of as if, as though and like in Present-day English Complementation Structures.” Journal of English Linguistics 40 (2): 172–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b“On Comparative Complementizers in English: Evidence from Historical Corpora.” In Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain , ed. by Nila Vázquez, 311–333 Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Forthcoming a. “From Clause to Pragmatic Marker: A Study of the Development of like-parentheticals in American English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics .Crossref
Forthcoming b. “Epistemic Parentheticals with Seem: Late Modern English in Focus” In The Syntax of Late Modern English ed. by Marianne Hundt Cambridge Cambridge University Press Crossref
Middle English Dictionary
1952–2001 Ed. by Hans Kurath, Sherman M. Kuhn, and Robert E. Lewis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Online: http://​ets​.umdl​.umich​.edu​/m​/med/ .
Mitchell, Bruce
1985 Old English Syntax . Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Möhlig-Falke, Ruth
2012 The Early English Impersonal Construction. An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning . New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1985“Complementation.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description , vol. 2, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OED
= Oxford English Dictionary , on CD-ROM 1992 Ed. by John A. Simpson, and Edmund S.C. Weiner. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna
1999 Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English . Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1991“On the History of that/zero as Object Clause Links in English.” In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik , ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, 272–289. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
2000 Configurations of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance Languages . London/New York: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1973“Slifting.” In The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages: Proceedings of the First International Conference , ed. by Maurice Gross, Morris Halle, and Marcel-Paul Schützenberger, 133–169. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo, and Gunnar Bergh
1996“Subject Extraction in English: Some Problems of Interpretation.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 30: 45–67.Google Scholar
Swanton, Michael
(ed.) 1997 Beowulf . Revised ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
1991“A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization , vol. 2, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1992“Syntax.” In The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066 , ed. by Richard M. Hogg, 168–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995“Subjectification in Grammaticalisation.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives , ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2008“Constructions in Grammaticalization and Lexicalization: Evidence from the History of a Composite Predicate Construction in English.” In Constructional Approaches to English Grammar , ed. by Graeme Trousdale, and Nikolas Gisborne, 33–67. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010“Issues in Constructional Approaches to Grammaticalization in English.” In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues , ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler, and Ekkehard König, 51–71. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2000“Grammaticalization versus Lexicalization: ‘Methinks’ There Is Some Confusion.” In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English , ed. by Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein, 355–370. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2015.  In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],  pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2016.  In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],  pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo
Moreton, Emma
2015. “I hope you will write”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. On English turn out and Spanish resultar mirative constructions. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2  pp. 160 ff. Crossref logo
Whitt, Richard J.
2018. Evidentiality and propositional scope in Early Modern German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:1  pp. 122 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.