Cover not available
Part of
Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243] 2014
► pp. 189–212

On the origin of clausal parenthetical constructions

Epistemic/evidential parentheticals with seem 
and impersonal think

| University of Santiago de Compostela
| University of Santiago de Compostela

This article contributes to the discussion on the origin of pragmatic markers by exploring the development of parenthetical structures with the two default verbs of seeming in the history of English: seem and impersonal think ‘seem, appear’. Drawing mainly on data from the Helsinki Corpus, we describe the most common construction types in which these two verbs appear, paying especial attention to their parenthetical use. We show that the emergence of parentheticals with these verbs precedes the increase in the frequency of the zero complementizer, thus calling into question Thompson and Mulac’s (1991) matrix-clause hypothesis. Rather, the history of seem- and impersonal think-parentheticals tallies with the developmental path proposed by Brinton (1996, 2008) for the parenthetical I think, as adverbial parentheticals (so/as it seems) clearly antedate bare parentheticals (it seems).

Published online: 11 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243.12lop
References
Aijmer, Karin
2009 “Seem and Evidentiality.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary
1898 Ed. by Joseph Bosworth, and T. Northcote Toller. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Asudeh, Ash, and Ida Toivonen
2005 “Copy Raising and Its Consequences for Perceptual Reports.” In Architectures, Rules, and Preferences: A Festschrift for Joan Bresnan , ed. by Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling, Chris Manning, Jane Simpson, and Annie Zaenen, 1–19. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2006 “Expletives and the Syntax and Semantics of Copy Raising.” In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference , ed. by Miriam Butt, and Tracy Holloway King, n.p. Stanford, CA: CSLI. Online: [URL] .
Bergh, Gunnar, and Aimo Seppänen
1994 “Subject Extraction in English: The Use of the that-complementizer.” In English Historical Linguistics 1992: Papers from the 7th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics , ed. by Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster, and Juan José Calvo, 131–143. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2007 “Complement-taking Predicates: Usage and Linguistic Structure.” Studies in Language 31 (3): 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Mads Poulsen
2011 “Complementizer Deletion in Spoken Danish.” Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, La Rioja, September 2011.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
1996  Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008  The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CED
= A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 2006 Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). More information: [URL] .
COCA
= Corpus of Contemporary American English 2008– Compiled by Mark Davies. Online: [URL] .
Dehé, Nicole, and Yordanka Kavalova
(eds) 2007  Parentheticals . Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger, and Michael Tomasello
2001 “The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 97–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DOEC
= Dictionary of Old English Corpus 2004 Project leader: Antonette diPaolo Healey. Toronto: University of Toronto. More information: [URL] .
Elmer, Willy
1981  Diachronic Grammar: The History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions . Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1990a “Finite Complement Clauses in Shakespeare’s English I.” Studia Neophilologica 62 (1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990b “Finite Complement Clauses in Shakespeare’s English II.” Studia Neophilologica 62 (2): 129–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward, and Douglas Biber
1995 “That and Zero Complementisers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990.” In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description , ed. by Bas Aarts, and Charles F. Meyer, 241–257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2007  Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas, and Jasper Holmes
2007 “A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance.” English Language and Linguistics 11 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HC = The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts 1991 Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). Department of English, University of Helsinki. More information: [URL] .
Herbst, Thomas
2004  A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
et al 2002  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2007 “Spoken Parentheticals in English: A Taxonomy.” In Parentheticals , ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 25–52. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Explaining Diverging Evidence: The Case of Clause-initial I think.” In Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research , ed. by Doris Schönefeld, 81–112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine, and Tania Kuteva
2011 “On Thetical Grammar.” Studies in Language 35 (4): 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Kate
2007 “Epistemic Verbs and Zero Complementizer.” English Language and Linguistics 11 (3): 475–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirch, Max S
1959 “Scandinavian Influence on English Syntax.” PMLA 74 (5): 503–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José
1996a “On the History of methinks: From Impersonal Construction to Fossilized Expression.” Folia Linguistica Historica 17: 153–169.Google Scholar
1996b “That/Zero Variation in Restoration English.” In English Historical Linguistics 1994 , ed. by Derek Britton, 271–286. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José, and Belén Méndez-Naya
2012a “On the Use of as if, as though and like in Present-day English Complementation Structures.” Journal of English Linguistics 40 (2): 172–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “On Comparative Complementizers in English: Evidence from Historical Corpora.” In Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain , ed. by Nila Vázquez, 311–333 Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Forthcoming a. “From Clause to Pragmatic Marker: A Study of the Development of like-parentheticals in American English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics .DOI logo
Forthcoming b. “Epistemic Parentheticals with Seem: Late Modern English in Focus” In The Syntax of Late Modern English ed. by Marianne Hundt Cambridge Cambridge University Press DOI logo
Middle English Dictionary
1952–2001 Ed. by Hans Kurath, Sherman M. Kuhn, and Robert E. Lewis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Online: [URL] .
Mitchell, Bruce
1985  Old English Syntax . Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möhlig-Falke, Ruth
2012  The Early English Impersonal Construction. An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning . New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1985 “Complementation.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description , vol. 2, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OED
= Oxford English Dictionary , on CD-ROM 1992 Ed. by John A. Simpson, and Edmund S.C. Weiner. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna
1999  Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English . Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985  A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1991 “On the History of that/zero as Object Clause Links in English.” In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik , ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, 272–289. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
2000  Configurations of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance Languages . London/New York: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1973 “Slifting.” In The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages: Proceedings of the First International Conference , ed. by Maurice Gross, Morris Halle, and Marcel-Paul Schützenberger, 133–169. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo, and Gunnar Bergh
1996 “Subject Extraction in English: Some Problems of Interpretation.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 30: 45–67.Google Scholar
Swanton, Michael
(ed.) 1997  Beowulf . Revised ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
1991 “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization , vol. 2, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1992 “Syntax.” In The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066 , ed. by Richard M. Hogg, 168–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “Subjectification in Grammaticalisation.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives , ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2008 “Constructions in Grammaticalization and Lexicalization: Evidence from the History of a Composite Predicate Construction in English.” In Constructional Approaches to English Grammar , ed. by Graeme Trousdale, and Nikolas Gisborne, 33–67. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 “Issues in Constructional Approaches to Grammaticalization in English.” In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues , ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler, and Ekkehard König, 51–71. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2000 “Grammaticalization versus Lexicalization: ‘Methinks’ There Is Some Confusion.” In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English , ed. by Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein, 355–370. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Lorenz, David
2023. Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases(it) Could/Might Be. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2015. Epistemic/evidential markers of the type verb + complementizer. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2016. From clause to adverb. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Moreton, Emma
2015. “I hope you will write”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. On Englishturn outand Spanishresultarmirative constructions. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Whitt, Richard J.
2018. Evidentiality and propositional scope in Early Modern German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.