Cover not available
Part of
Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243] 2014
► pp. 237–254

Front field negation in spoken Swedish

A regional archaism?

ORCID logo | University of Helsinki
The Swedish negating adverb inte ‘not’ usually occurs in the middle of a clause but can also occur in the first constituent position, in the syntactic front field. Fronted negation is common in the spoken varieties of Swedish in Finland, but less typical in the spoken varieties in Sweden. The question is whether or not front field negation is an archaism in Finland Swedish. As there are no recordings of older spoken Swedish, a corpus of drama dialogue from 1725–2000 is consulted. The results show that front field negation is more frequent in the plays from the older periods and matches the pragmatic contexts that are typical of the construction in Present-day Finland Swedish. This historical material suggests that front field negation belongs to an older conversational style in Swedish that is still prevalent in Finland Swedish and it is also reinforced by a parallel usage in Finnish.
Published online: 11 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243.14lin
References (27)
References
Datasets
FISC = En finlandssvensk textkorpus [A Finland Swedish text corpus]. 1995. Project leader: Mirja Saari. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. Online: [URL] .
GRIS = Samtalsspråkets grammatik [the kernel corpus of Swedish conversations within the project Grammar in Conversation: A Study of Swedish ]. 2001. Project leaders: Jan Anward, and Bengt Nordberg. More information: [URL] .
HS:V1 = Helsingforssvenska (NorDiga) [a collection of Swedish conversations in the Helsinki region]. 2003. Project leader: Jan Lindström. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. Online: [URL] .
HUSA = Språk och attityder bland helsingforssvenska ungdomar (NorDiga) [Language and attitudes among Swedish speaking youth in Helsinki]. 1994. Project leader: Mirja Saari. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. Online: [URL] .
INK = Interaktion i en institutionell context [Interaction in an institutional context]. 2000. Project leader: Anne-Marie Londen. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. Not publically available.
SAM = Svenska samtal i Helsingfors (NorDiga) [Swedish conversations in Helsinki]. 1991. Project leader: Anne-Marie Londen. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, University of Helsinki. Online: [URL] .
SD = Svensk dramadialog [Drama dialogue in Sweden]. 2001. Project leader: Mats Thelander. Department of Scandinavian languages, University of Uppsala. More information: [URL] .
SUC = Stockholm–Umeå Corpus . 1997. Project leaders: Gunnel Källgren, and Eva Ejerhed. Universities of Stockholm och Umeå. Online: [URL] .
Secondary sources
Ahlström, Gunnar. 1974. Det moderna genombrottet i Nordens litteratur . Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren.Google Scholar
Bergroth, Hugo. 1917. Finlandssvenska: Handledning till undvikande av provinsialismer i tal och skrift . Helsingfors: Schildts.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj. 2005. Interfaces: Negation – Syntax – Brain. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of English, University of Aarhus and the MR Research Centre, Aarhus University Hospital. Online: [URL] .
Diderichsen, Paul. 1946. Elementær dansk grammatik . København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Mats. 1998. “Dialog i drama och verklighet: En sekvens hos Norén och i ett vardagligt samtal.” In Samtalsstudier , ed. by Hanna Lehti-Eklund, 43–56. Helsingfors: Helsingfors universitet.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi . Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Herman, Vimala. 1995. Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holmer, Arthur. 2006. “The place of Swedish in word order typology.” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59 (1): 76–102.Google Scholar
Huldén, Lars. 1995. ”Österbottnisk negationslära.” Svenska landsmål och svenskt folkliv 118: 175–186.Google Scholar
Josephson, Olle. 2004. Ju: Ifrågasatta självklarheter om svenskan, engelskan och alla andra språk i Sverige . Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska förlag.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2011. “The terms of not knowing.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation , ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 184–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna. 2003. “Kammarjungfrun och vårdbiträdet: Språk och sociala relationer i ett 1700-talsdrama och i 1990-talets hemtjänst.” In Svenska på scen: Språk och språkanvändning i svensk dramatext från tre sekler , ed. by Siv Strömquist, 152–183. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan. 2007. “Initial Clausal Negation – A Nordic Areal Feature.” In Linguistics Festival, May 2006, Bremen , ed. by Andreas Ammann, 31–58. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Lundström, Gudrun. 1939. Studier i nyländsk syntax . Stockholm: Norstedt & Söner.Google Scholar
Melander Marttala, Ulla, and Siv Strömquist. 2001. Korpusen Svensk dramadialog: Användarhandbok . Uppsala: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Uppsala universitet.Google Scholar
Saari, Mirja. 1995. “Synpunkter på svenskt språkbruk i Sverige och Finland.” Folkmålsstudier 36: 75–108.Google Scholar
Strömquist, Siv. 2003. “Svensk dramatik på svenska scener under tre hundra år. In Svenska på scen: Språk och språkanvändning i svensk dramatext från tre sekler , ed. by Siv Strömquist, 12–36. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg, and Erik Andersson. 1999. Svenska Akademiens grammatik, vol. 4: Satser och meningar . Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rosenkvist, Henrik
2021. Clause-final negative particles in varieties of Swedish. Studies in Language 45:3 ► pp. 598 ff. DOI logo
Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm, Inga-Lill Grahn & Martina Huhtamäki
2020. Chapter 9. Consecutive clause combinations in instructing activities. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.