Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht
Edited by Stacey Katz Bourns and Lindsy L. Myers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 244] 2014
► pp. 109–130

Topics at the left periphery in Russian

ORCID logo
This paper analyses a paradigm in Russian in which a preposed nominal stranding a numeral can show (paucal) number connectivity, with a gap following the numeral, or can appear in a non-agreeing (plural) form: (1) theater-paucal/plural, there were three. paucal__ Numerous syntactic diagnostics confirm that, when there is number connectivity, the nominal has been fronted via A′-movement, creating a syntactic A′-chain dependency. In the absence of connectivity, the construction involves a hanging topic related via discourse mechanisms to a base-generated null pronoun. These two constructions constitute a minimal pair and can be considered a counterpart to the better-known left edge topics observed in Romance or Germanic languages.
Published online: 5 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.06pol
References (57)
References
Aissen, Judith. 1992. “Topic and Focus in Mayan.” Language 68: 43–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2006. “Left Dislocation (including CLLD).” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, volume II, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 668–699. Malden: Blackwell. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1994. Clitic Dependencies in Modern Greek. Ph.D. Diss., University of Salzburg.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Clitic Left Dislocation and Contrastive Left Dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, eds. 1997. Materials on Left Dislocation . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, Abbas Benmamoun, and Lina Choueiri. 2010. The Syntax of Arabic . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, and Lina Choueiri. 2000. “Epithets.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 1–39. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Bailyn, John. 1995. “Underlying Phrase Structure and Short Verb Movement in Russian.” Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3: 13–58.Google Scholar
. 2001. “On Scrambling: A Reply to Boškovi? and Takahashi.” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 635–658. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Does Russian Scrambling Exist?” In Word Order and Scrambling , ed. by Simin Karimi, 156–176. Malden: Blackwell. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2007. “A Derivational Approach to Micro-variation in Slavic Binding.” In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15 , ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 25–41. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
. 2012. The Syntax of Russian . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. “Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP Sublayers.” In The structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2003. Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko, 2006. “Case and Agreement with Genitive of Quantification in Russian.” In Agreement Systems, ed. by Cedric Boeckx, 99–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko, and Steven Franks. 2000. “Across the Board Movement and LF.” Syntax 3: 107–128. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2000. “Doubling Structures and Reconstruction.” Probus 12: 93–126. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding . Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Choo, Suk-hoon, Jun-hee Hong, Ji-young Hwang. 2007. “Genitive-initial Sentences in Russian and the Typology of Case Assignment.” Language and Linguistics , 153–174
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. “The Movement Nature of Left Dislocation.” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397–411.Google Scholar
. 1990. Types of A’-dependencies . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1997[1983]. “‘Topic’ Constructions in some European Languages and ‘Connectedness’.” In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 93–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crockett, Dina. 1976. Agreement in Contemporary Standard Russian . Cambridge: Slavica.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 2001. “Parasitic Gaps: A History.” In Parasitic Gaps , ed. by Peter Culicover and Paul Postal, 3–68. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
De Cat, Cecile. 2007. French Dislocation: Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1983. “Parasitic Gaps.” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Escobar, Linda. 1997. “Clitic Left Dislocation and other Relatives.” In Materials on Left Dislocation, ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 233–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1992. “A Prominence Constraint on Null Operator Constructions.” Lingua 87: 35–54.Google Scholar
. 1993. “On Parallelism in Across-the-board Dependencies.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 509–529.Google Scholar
1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax . New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Gunther. 2008. “The Left Clausal Periphery: Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and Left Dislocation in German.” In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives , ed. by Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, 49–94. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul. 1997. “On the Source of Lefthand NPs in French.” In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, and Jairo Nunes. 2002. “On Asymmetries Between Parasitic Gap and Across-the-board Constructions.” Syntax 5: 26–54. DOI logo.Google Scholar
House, Richard. 1982. The Use of Genitive Initial Sentences for the Specification of Quantity in Russian. Ph.D. Diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Ivlieva, Natalia. 2007. “Parasitic Gaps in Russian.” In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15 , ed. by Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 132–140. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Kasai, Hironobu. 2004. “Two Notes on ATB Movement.” Language and Linguistics 5: 167–188.Google Scholar
King, Tracy Holloway. 1995. Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. “On the Formal and Functional Relationship between Topics and Vocatives: Evidence from French.” In Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language , ed. by Adele E. Golberg, 267–288.Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Dislocation.” In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook . (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 20). vol. 2, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible, 1050–1078. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lopez, Luis. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure . Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement . Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara, and Vladimir Borschev. 2006. “Information Structure, Perspectival Structure, Diathesis Alternation, and the Russian Genitive of Negation.” In Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Logic and Language (LoLa 9) , 120–129. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and Categories. Ph.D. Diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and Language Design . Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax , ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. Diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Sekerina, Irina. 1997. The Syntax and Processing of Scrambling Constructions in Russian. Ph.D. Diss., CUNY Graduate Center.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2006. “Strong vs. Weak Islands.” In Blackwell Companion to Syntax vol. 4 , ed. by Martin Everaert and Riemsdijk Henk van, 479–531.Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1979. On Complementation in Icelandic . New York: Garland.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1997. “Left Dislocation.” In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdjik, Henk, and Frans Zwarts. 1997. “Left Dislocation in Dutch and Status of Copying Rules.” In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vat, Jan. 1997. “Left Dislocation, Connectedness, and Reconstruction.” In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 67–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1978. “Across-the-board Rule Application.” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 1997. “Parasitic Operators in German Left-dislocation.” In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 307–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiang, Ming, Boris Harizanov, Maria Polinsky, and Ekaterina Kravtchenko. 2011. “Processing Morphological Ambiguity: An Experimental Investigation of Russian Numerical Phrases.” Lingua 121: 548–560. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie. 1997. “Contrastive Dislocation in Dutch and Icelandic.” In Materials on Left Dislocation , ed. by Elena Anagnostopoulou, Riemsdijk Henk van, and Frans Zwarts, 119–150. Amste. DOI logo