Cover not available
Part of
The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status
Edited by Hanna Pishwa and Rainer Schulze
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 248] 2014
► pp. 105–141

Unveiling the phantom of the "Islamic takeover"

A critical, cognitive-linguistic analysis of the discursive perpetuation of an Orientalist

| University of Lausanne
| University of Basel
This paper examines the linguistic and pictorial representation of Muslims and Islam in a Swiss right-wing populist party’s campaign for a federal minaret ban. Using a methodology that combines Conceptual Metaphor Theory with Critical Discourse Analysis we explore two interacting levels of the discourse under examination. Firstly, we show that the discourse is centrally informed by the metaphorical Idealized Cognitive Model of an islamic takeover, with its two metaphorical subframes of conquest and organic growth. Secondly, we describe the discursive strategies – such as categorization, indexing, semantic reframing, the exploitation of intertextual links – used to (re)activate and perpetuate this cognitive model.
Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.05lan
References (59)
References
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and its Others.” American Anthropologist104(3): 783–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arberry, Arthur John. 1996 [1955]. The Koran Interpreted: A Translation. Touchstone: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2005. “Situated Conceptualization.” In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ed. by Henri Cohen, and Claire Lefebvre, 619–650. Amsterdam: 
Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society17(6): 563–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors: The Case of ‘Mein Kampf’.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 15–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul, and George Lakoff. 1995. “Foreign Policy by Metaphor.” In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Schaffner, and Anita Wenden, 37–60. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1997. “What Makes Mainstream Media Mainstream.” Z Magazine, October 1997 [last accessed: 6 Nov 2012] [URL]Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eidgenössische Ausländerkommission EKA (eds.) 2005. Muslime in der Schweiz. Identitätsprofile, Erwartungen und Einstellungen. Eine Studie der Forschungsgruppe „Islam in der Schweiz“ (GRIS). Bern-Wabern: EKA.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, and Wallace V. Friesen. 1975. Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Expressions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ettinger, Paul, and Kurt Imhof. 2009. “Zentrale Merkmale der öffentlichen Debatte über die Minarettinitiative: Inhaltsanalyse des fög – Forschungsbereichs Öffentlichkeit und Gesellschaft.” FÖG Research Paper, Universität Zürich. [last accessed: Nov 7 2012] [URL]Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society3(2): 193–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning.” In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, ed. by Cathy Cogen, Henry Thompson, Graham Thurgood, Kenneth Whistler, and James Wright, 123–131. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica5(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1982. “The Rediscovery of ‘Ideology’: Return of the Repressed in Media Studies.” In Culture, Society and Media, ed. by Tony Bennett, James Curran, Michael Gurevitch, and Janet Wollacott, 56–90. London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Spectacle of the ‘Other’.” In Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor and Simeon J. Yates, 325–344. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Harnad, Stevan. 2005. “To Cognize is to Categorize: Cognition is Categorization.” In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ed. by Henri Cohen, and Claire Lefebvre, 19–43. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. “Moving Beyond Metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistics Approach to CDA: Construal Operations in Immigration Discourse.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 171–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “Force-Interactive Patterns in Immigration Discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA.” Discourse & Society22(3): 269–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher, and Dominik Lukeš. 2007. Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 1996. “Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the ‘Winter of Discontent’.” Sociology30(2): 253–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. 1988. Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Indurkhya, Bipin. 1992. Metaphor and Cognition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Jungi SVP Basel-Stadt. 2011. “Unterschreiben Sie jetzt die Vermummungsverbots-Initiative!” [last accessed: 13 Nov 2012] [URL]
Kiesling, Scott F. 2006. “Hegemonic Identity Making in Narrative.” In Discourse and Identity, ed. by Anna De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg, 261–287. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2006. Language, Mind, and Culture. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. “Metaphor and War. The Metaphor System Used to Justifiy War in the Gulf.” In Metaphor – How Abstract Reason Arises From the Sensory-Motor System. University of Berkeley Reader.Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. The Esssential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar
. 2007. Whose Freedom? The Battle of America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroud.Google Scholar
. 2008. The Political Mind: Why you Can’t Understand 21st-Century Politics with an 18th-Century Brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of 
Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. Rockridge Institute and 2006. Frames and Brains. Chap. 3 of Thinking Points: Communicating Our American Values and Vision. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroud.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Mumby, Dennis, and Robin Clair. 1999. “Organizational Discourse.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Vol 2, ed. by Teun van Dijk. 181–205. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran A. 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Renkema, Jan. 2003. “On Solving Orwell’s Problem in Governmental Communication. Experimental Research into the Structure of Website Information.” In Linguistica e Nuove Professioni, Proceedings of the Pavia-Lugano Conference , ed. by Anna Giacalone-Ramat, Eddo Rigotti, and Andrea Rocci, 245–263. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Schön, Donald. 1993. “Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Solving in Social Policy.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 137–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schweizerische Volkspartei SVP. 2009. Parteizeitung SVP-Klartext 2009. [last accessed: 13 Nov 2012] [URL]Google Scholar
Schweizer Presserat. 2007. “Wahrheits- und Berichtigungspflicht / Anhörung bei schweren Vorwürfen (Einwohnergemeinde Roggwil c. «Berner Zeitung») Stellungnahme des Schweizer Presserates vom 16. November 2007.” [last accessed: 8 Nov 2012] [URL]
Strahm, Doris. 2010. “Feministische Nachlese zur Minarettabtimmung.” [last accessed: Nov 7 2012] [URL]
Talmy, Leonard.1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science12: 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jörg Schmid.2006. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. 
Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. “Discourse as Interaction in Society.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Vol.2., ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 1–37. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Discourse and Racism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, ed. by David Goldberg, and John Solomos, 145–159. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society17(2): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Ruth Wodak (eds.). 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar