Cover not available
Part of
The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status
Edited by Hanna Pishwa and Rainer Schulze
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 248] 2014
► pp. 143–162

Power eliciting elements at the semantic-pragmatic interface

Data from cyberbullying and virtual character assassination attempts

| Technische Universität Berlin
Power, in this article, is to be understood as an instrument of force that is imposed purposely in order to influence, affect or persuade others. The question here is whether such power is due to aggressive expressions (lexical level) or to context-dependent aspects (discourse level) that become relevant when insulting persons via new media. I will distinguish between “cyberbullying” as an attempt to hurt a person’s feelings directly via personal SMS or email and “virtual character assassination attempts” that include third parties as an audience. Potential readers not directly involved are considered a constitutive eliciting element of power. It is assumed that their existence is even more important and effective (in terms of strengthening the perpetrator’s power) than aggressive language.
Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.06mar
References (54)
References
Aftab, Parry. 2008. “Stop Cyberbullying. What is It? How It Works? Why Cyberbully? Prevention. Take Action. What’s the Law?” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).
Aktion Kinder und Jugendschutz Schleswig-Holstein. 2009. “Mobbing an der Schule. Hinweise für Eltern.” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012)
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. Macht und Gewalt. München: Piper.Google Scholar
Belsey, Bill. 2006. “Cyberbullying: An Emerging Threat to the ‘Always on’ Generation.” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).
Beran, Tanya, and Qing Li. 2007. “The Relationship between Cyberbullying and School Bullying.” Journal of Student Wellbeing1(2): 15–33.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg. 2000. “Die Macht des Wortes.” In Macht und Abhängigkeit, ed. by Peter 
Buchheim, and Manfred Cierpka, 120–131. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbineau-Hoffmann, Angelika, and Pascal Nicklas (eds). 2000. Gewalt der Sprache – Sprache der Gewalt: Beispiele aus philologischer Sicht. Hildesheim: Olms. Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1986. “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal95: 1601–1629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cross, Emma-Jane, Ben Richardson, Thaddaeus Douglas, and Jessica Vonkaenel-Flatt. 2009. “Virtual Violence: Protecting Children from Cyberbullying.” London: Beatbullying Rochester House. [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2004. Understanding Words That Wound. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Döring, Nicola. 2000. “Identität + Internet = Virtuelle Identität?” forum medienethik2: 65–75.Google Scholar
Ekeh, Peter. 1974. Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fawzi, Nayla. 2009a. Cyber-Mobbing. Ursachen und Auswirkungen von Mobbing im Internet. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
. 2009b. “’Und jeder bekommt es mit …’ Cyber-Mobbing – die Veränderungen gegenüber traditionellem Mobbing.” Blickpunkt1: 8–10.Google Scholar
Feufel, Markus, Frederica S. Stahl, and Soo-Youn Lee. 2013. “Was Hänschen nicht googelt, findet Hans nimmermehr? Online-Suche im Vergleich der Generationen.” In Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel, 166–185. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flanagin, Andrew J., and Miriam J. Metzger. 2000. “Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fobbe, Eilika. 2011. Forensische Linguistik: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gallery, Heike. 2000. “’Bin-ich-klick-ich’ – Variable Anonymität im Chat.” In Soziales im Netz. Sprache, soziale Beziehungen und Kommunikationskulturen im Internet, ed. by Caja Thimm, 72–88. Wiesbaden: Opladen.Google Scholar
Gradinger, Petra. 2010. Cyberbullying: Mobbing mit neuen Medien. Universität Wien. PhD-Thesis.Google Scholar
Gradinger, Petra, Dagmar Strohmeier, and Christiane Spiel. 2009. “Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying. Identification of Risk Groups for Adjustment Problems.” Journal of Psychology217(4): 205–213.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1989. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, ed. by H. Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1978. “Hannah Arendts Begriff der Macht.” In Politik, Kunst, Religion: Essays über zeitgenössische Philosophen, ed. by Jürgen Habermas, 103–126. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Steffen, Sybille Krämer, and Hannes Kuch (eds). 2007. Verletzende Worte. Die Grammatik sprachlicher Missachtung. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Hinduja, Sameer, and Justin W. Patchin. 2007. “Offline Consequences of Online Victimization.” Journal of School Violence6: 89–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization.” Deviant Behavior29: 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Bullying beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Holod, Oxana. 1998. “Einige Besonderheiten des Sprechaktes „Beschimpfung“.” Grazer Linguistische Studien49: 29–36.Google Scholar
Jäger, Reinhold S., Julia Riebel, Uwe Fischer, and Lisa Fluck. 2009. “Mobbing bei Schülerinnen und Schülern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine empirische Untersuchung auf der Grundlage einer Online-Befragung im Jahre 2009.” [URL][URL] (accessed 24 November 2012)
Johnson, Thomas, and Barbara Kaye. 2002. “Webbelievability: A Path Model Examining How Convenience and Reliance Predict Online Credibility.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 79(3): 619–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katzer, Catarina, Detlef Fetchenhauer, and Frank Belschak. 2009. “Cyberbullying in Internet-Chatrooms – Wer sind die Täter? Ein Vergleich von Bullying in Internet-Chatrooms mit Bullying in der Schule aus der Täterperspektive.” Zeitschrift für Entwiclungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie 41(1): 33–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kepplinger, Hans M. 2007. “Reciprocal Effects. Towards a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers.” The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(2): 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiener, Franz. 1983. Das Wort als Waffe. Zur Psychologie der verbalen Aggression. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck.Google Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja. 2007. “Sprachliche Strategien verbaler Ablehnung in öffentlichen Diskussionsforen im Internet.” In Verletzende Worte. Die Grammatik sprachlicher Missachtung, ed. by Steffen Herrmann, Sybille Krämer, and Hannes Kuch, 311–336. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 1998. “Zwischen ‘Zauber des Wortes’ und ‘Wort als Waffe’. Versuch, über die ‘Macht des Wortes’ zu reden.” In Sprache und/oder Gewalt? ed. by Franz Januschek, and Klaus Gloy, 13–30. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie.Google Scholar
Kowalski, Robin M., and Susan P. Limber. 2007. “Electronic Bullying Among Middle School Students.” Journal of Adolescent Health41: 22–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, Robin M., Susan P. Limber, and Patricia W. Agatston. 2012. Cyberbullying. Bullying in the Digital Age. 2nd edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin. 1999. Gewalt im Gespräch. Verbale Gewalt in politischen Fernsehdiskussionen am Beispiel der ‘Arena’. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marx, Konstanze. 2013. “Virtueller Rufmord – Offene Fragen aus linguistischer Perspektive.” In Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel, 237–266. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marx, Konstanze, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel (eds). 2013. Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (ed.), 2009/2012/2013. JIM-Studie 2009/ 2012/2013. “Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger. Stuttgart.” [URL] (accessed 6 April 2014).
Olweus, Dan. 1993. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Runkehl, Jens, Torsten Siever, and Peter Schlobinski. 1998. Sprache und Kommunikation im Internet: Überblick und Analysen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika. 2007. Sprache und Emotion. Tübingen and Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
. 2013. “‘Juden sind zum Töten da’ (studivz.net, 2008) Hass via Internet – Zugänglichkeit und Verbreitung von Antisemitismen im World Wide Web.” In Sprache und Kommunikation im technischen Zeitalter. Wieviel Internet (v)erträgt unsere Gesellschaft? ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Monika Schwarz-Friesel, 213–236. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter, Jess Mahdavi, Manuel Carvalho, and Neil Tippett. 2006. “An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying.” [URL] (accessed 24 November 2012).
Smith, Peter, Jess Mahdavi, Manuel Carvalho, Sonja Fisher, Shanette Russell, and Neil Tippett. 2008. “Cyberbullying: Its Nature and Impact in Secondary School Pupils.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry49: 376–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Dongyoung, and John D. Leckenby. 2007. “A Structural Solution to Communication Dilemmas in a Virtual Community.” Journal of Communication57: 435–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Nobuyuki. 2000. “The Emergence of Generalized Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology105: 1105–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannock, Stuart. 1999. “Working with Insults: Discourse and Difference in an Inner-city Youth Organization.” Discourse and Society10(3): 317–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willard, Nancy. 2007. Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Champaign, Ill: Research Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ybarra, Michele L., and Kimberly J. Mitchell. 2004. “Online Aggressor/Targets, Aggressors, and Targets: A Comparison of Associated Youth Characteristics.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry45(7): 1308–1316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ybarra, Michele L., Marie Diener-West, and Philip J. Leaf. 2007. “Examining the Overlap in Internet Harassment and School Bullying: Implications for School Intervention.” Journal of Adolescent Health41(6): 42–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar