Cover not available
Part of
The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status
Edited by Hanna Pishwa and Rainer Schulze
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 248] 2014
► pp. 239–264

Language, normativity and power

The discursive construction of objectophilia

ORCID logo | Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main
The present paper aims to shed light on how social actors orient to sexual normativity in their talk. It relates normativity to (Foucauldian) notions of discourse and power, arguing that local linguistic negotiations of sexuality are generally shaped by a competition between dominant and marginalized discourses. The empirical section focusses on how sexual normativity is linguistically constructed in conversations related to objectophilia, a form of sexual desire that is clearly non-normative. The data consists of telephone calls from the German radio phone-in show Domian. It is shown how speakers co-construct sexual normativity in general as well as more specific forms of it such as humano-normativity and heteronormativity. It can be seen that even the construction of non-normative desires is predominantly structured by normative sexuality discourses.
Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.248.10mot
References
Bourdieu, Pierre
1991 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Sean
2006 “Norms and Correctness.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. ( Second Edition ). Volume VIII, ed. by Edward K. Brown, 701–703. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2004 “Theorizing Identity in Language and Sexuality Research.” Language in Society 33(4): 469–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bußmann, Hadumod, and Marlis Hellinger
2003 “Engendering Female Visibility in German.” In Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume III, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bußmann, 141–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith
2004 Undoing Gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, and Don Kulick
2003 Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Identity Crisis?” Language & Communication 25(2): 107–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1972 [1969] The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1978 [1976] The History of Sexuality. Volume 1. An Introduction. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira
2013 “‘It’s a Hijra!’ Queer Linguistics Revisited.” Discourse & Society24(5): 634–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Jeffrey, and Betty LaFrance
2012 “ ‘That’s Gay’: Sexual Prejudice, Gender Identity, Norms, and Homophobic Communication.” Communication Quarterly60(1): 35–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, Lesley
2007 Textual Construction of the Female Body: A Critical Discourse Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika
2013 “Constructing (Non-) Normative Identities in Written Lesbian Discourse: A Diachronic Study.” Discourse & Society24(5): 572–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulick, Don
2005 “The Importance of What Gets Left Out.” Discourse Studies7(4/5): 615–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leap, William L.
2013 “Queering Language and Normativity.” Discourse & Society24(5): 643–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, Nigel
1994 “Correctness and Norms.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by R.E. Asher, 773–780. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Married to the Eiffel Tower.
2008 [URL] (2 January 2013).
Marsh, Amy
2010 “Love Among the Objectum Sexuals.” Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality13(1): [URL] (5 November 2013).Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso
2013 “Are ‘Queers’ Really ‘Queer’? Language, Identity and Same-Sex Desire in a South African Online Community.” Discourse & Society24(5): 615–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003 Michel Foucault. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2009 “Speaking the Gendered Body: The Performative Construction of Commercial Femininities and Masculinities via Body-Part Vocabulary.” Language in Society38(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Taking Queer Linguistics Further: Sociolinguistics and Critical Heteronormativity Research.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language212: 149–179.Google Scholar
2014 “Focusing on Normativity in Language and Sexuality Studies: Insights from Conversations on Objectophilia.” Critical Discourse Studies11(1): 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko, and Martin Stegu
2013 “Queer Linguistic Approaches to Discourse.” Discourse & Society24(5): 519–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Objectum Sexuality Internationale.
2011 [URL] (2 January 2013).
Taylor, Talbot J.
1997 Theorizing Language: Analysis, Normativity, Rhetoric, History. Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Thadeusz, Frank
2007 “Drang zum Ding.” Der Spiegel 19/2007: 160.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew
2012 “Using Corpora in Depth Psychology: A Trigram-Based Analysis of a Corpus of Fetish Fantasies.” Corpora7(1): 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Coimbra-Gomes, Elvis & Heiko Motschenbacher
2019. Language, normativity, and sexual orientation obsessive-compulsive disorder (SO-OCD): A corpus-assisted discourse analysis. Language in Society 48:4 ► pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
Gatzia, Dimitria Electra & Sarah Arnaud
2022. Loving Objects: Can Autism Explain Objectophilia?. Archives of Sexual Behavior 51:4 ► pp. 2117 ff. DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2018. Language and Sexual Normativity. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.