Part of
Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
Edited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 7391
Bybee, Joan
1986“On the Nature of Grammatical Categories: a Diachronic Perspective.” In Proceedings of the Second Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. by S. Choi, D. Devitt, W. Janis, T. McCoy, and Z.-S. Zhang, 17–34. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
1998“Irrealis as a Grammatical Category.” Anthropological Linguistics 40: 257–271.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2008“Subordination, Coordination: Form, Semantics, Pragmatics.” In Subordination and Coordination in North Asian Languages, ed. by E.J. Vaida, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003Subordination [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009“Grammatical Categories and Relations: Universality vs. Language-specificity and Construction-specificity.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 441–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1998“Linguistic Evidence and Mental Representations.” Cognitive Linguistics 9: 51–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff
1997“Semantic Subordination Despite Syntactic Coordination.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 195–217.Google Scholar
Deane, Paul
1991“Limits to Attention: A Cognitive Theory of Island Phenomena.” Cognitive Linguistics 2: 1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1997“Are Grammatical Relations Universal?” In Essays in Language Function and Language Type, ed. by Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteshik-Shir, Nomi, and Shalom Lappin
1979“Dominance and the Functional Explanation of Island Phenomena.” Theoretical Linguistics 6: 41–86.Google Scholar
Haiman, John, and Sandra A. Thompson
1984 ‘Subordination’ in Universal Grammar. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistic Society , 510–523.
Haspelmath, Martin
1995“The Converb as a Cross-linguistically Valid Category.” In Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, and Ekkehard König, 1–56. 
Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva
2007The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Mechthild Reh
1984Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D
1984Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin, and Yakov G. Testelets
2004“Where Coordination Meets Subordination: Converb Constructions in Tsakhur.” In Coordinating Constructions, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, 227–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumo
1976“Subject, Theme, and the Speaker’s Empathy.” In Subject and Topic, ed. by C.N. Li, 417–444. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1997“Generics and Habituals.” In On Conditionals Again, ed. by Angeliki
 Athanasiadou, and René Dirven, 191–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008“Subordination in Cognitive Grammar.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 137–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1988“Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 181–225. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
1973“Serial verb constructions in Mandarin Chinese: Coordination or Subordination?” In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node: Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival, ed. by Chicago Linguistics Society, 96–103.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol
1993Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2009“Re(e)volving Complexity: Adding Intonation.” In Syntactic Complexity, ed. by Talmy Givón, and Masayoshi Shibatani, 53–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1983Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R
1988“Amele Switch-reference and the Theory of Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 45–63.Google Scholar
Saxena, Anju
1988 “On Syntactic Convergence: The Case of the Verb say in Tibeto-Burman.” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society , 375–388.
Stassen, Leon
1985Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
1985“Grammar and Written Discourse: Initial vs. Final Purpose Clauses in English.” Text5: 55–84.Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich H
1961Die Ewe-Sprache in Togo. Zweite berichtigte Aussage von E. Kähler-­Meyer. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Cristofaro, Sonia
2016. Chapter 15. Routes to insubordination. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Fong, Ronald
2017. Chinese Motion-Directional Construction: A Conceptual and Cognitive Analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 38:2  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Nikitina, Tatiana & Alexandra Vydrina
2020. Reported speech in Kakabe: Loose syntax with flexible indexicality . Folia Linguistica 54:1  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.