Article published in:

Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
Edited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 73–91

Is there really a syntactic category of subordination?

Sonia Cristofaro

While different criteria are used in the literature in order to define subordinate clauses, these clauses are generally assumed to form a syntactic category, in the sense of a syntactically defined class that is relevant to speakers of individual languages. Many phenomena that are usually regarded as distinctive for subordination, however, do not actually provide evidence for such a category. This is illustrated in the paper with regard to syntactic embedding. Different criteria provide conflicting evidence as to the embedded vs. nonembedded status of particular clauses, the same criteria give different results for the same clause types in different contexts, and individual criteria do not always make it possible to identify distinct clause classes. This is because the various phenomena that are usually regarded as evidence for embedding are not actually motivated in terms of the same principles, nor are they syntactically motivated. Rather, these phenomena reflect a variety of semantic and pragmatic principles, and in some cases originate from diachronic processes independent of the syntactic status of the relevant clauses.

Published online: 04 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.249.03cri

References

Bybee, Joan

1986 “On the Nature of Grammatical Categories: a Diachronic Perspective.” In Proceedings of the Second Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. by S. Choi, D. Devitt, W. Janis, T. McCoy, and Z.-S. Zhang, 17–34. The Ohio State University.

1998 “Irrealis as a Grammatical Category.” Anthropological Linguistics 40: 257–271.

Comrie, Bernard

2008 “Subordination, Coordination: Form, Semantics, Pragmatics.” In Subordination and Coordination in North Asian Languages, ed. by E.J. Vaida, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cristofaro, Sonia

2003 Subordination [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford University Press.

2009 “Grammatical Categories and Relations: Universality vs. Language-specificity and Construction-specificity.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 441–479.

Croft, William

1998 “Linguistic Evidence and Mental Representations.” Cognitive Linguistics 9: 51–73.

2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff

1997 “Semantic Subordination Despite Syntactic Coordination.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 195–217.

Deane, Paul

1991 “Limits to Attention: A Cognitive Theory of Island Phenomena.” Cognitive Linguistics 2: 1–63.

Dryer, Matthew

1997 “Are Grammatical Relations Universal?” In Essays in Language Function and Language Type, ed. by Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Erteshik-Shir, Nomi, and Shalom Lappin

1979 “Dominance and the Functional Explanation of Island Phenomena.” Theoretical Linguistics 6: 41–86.

Haiman, John, and Sandra A. Thompson

1984 ‘Subordination’ in Universal Grammar. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistic Society , 510–523.

Haspelmath, Martin

1995 “The Converb as a Cross-linguistically Valid Category.” In Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, and Ekkehard König, 1–56.  Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

2004 “Does Linguistic Explanation Presuppose Linguistic Description?” Studies in Language 28: 554–579.

Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva

2007 The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heine, Bernd, and Mechthild Reh

1984 Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.

Huddleston, Rodney D.

1984 Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kazenin, Konstantin, and Yakov G. Testelets

2004 “Where Coordination Meets Subordination: Converb Constructions in Tsakhur.” In Coordinating Constructions, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, 227–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kuno, Susumo

1976 “Subject, Theme, and the Speaker’s Empathy.” In Subject and Topic, ed. by C.N. Li, 417–444. New York: Academic Press.

Langacker, Ronald W.

1997 “Generics and Habituals.” In On Conditionals Again, ed. by Angeliki  Athanasiadou, and René Dirven, 191–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2008 “Subordination in Cognitive Grammar.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 137–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lehmann, Christian

1988 “Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 181–225.  Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson

1973 “Serial verb constructions in Mandarin Chinese: Coordination or Subordination?” In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node: Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival, ed. by Chicago Linguistics Society, 96–103.

Lord, Carol

1993 Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mithun, Marianne

2009 “Re(e)volving Complexity: Adding Intonation.” In Syntactic Complexity, ed. by Talmy Givón, and Masayoshi Shibatani, 53–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Reinhart, Tanya

1983 Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.

Roberts, John R.

1988 “Amele Switch-reference and the Theory of Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 45–63.

Saxena, Anju

1988 “On Syntactic Convergence: The Case of the Verb say in Tibeto-Burman.” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society , 375–388.

Stassen, Leon

1985 Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Thompson, Sandra A.

1985 “Grammar and Written Discourse: Initial vs. Final Purpose Clauses in English.” Text5: 55–84.

Westermann, Diedrich H.

1961 Die Ewe-Sprache in Togo. Zweite berichtigte Aussage von E. Kähler-Meyer. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Cristofaro, Sonia

2016. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 393 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.