Article published in:Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
Edited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 93–124
Rhetorical use of some Finnish conjunctions in constructions and the scope of subordination
This article describes the nature and meaning of a group of constructions that include different conjunctions and onomatopoetic expressions as their elements. Some of these conjunctions are subordinating, while others are coordinating; the constructions thus create depictions of various states of affairs using differing designs of construal, some with a more symmetrical design, others with an asymmetrical design. The tone of each construction varies, depending on the conjunction chosen and the order of the elements. Two types of constructions with subordinating conjunctions kun (‘when’) and kunnes (‘until’) are studied more closely in order to demonstrate how these constructions work and how they acquire their meaning. It will be argued that these constructions are recurring rhetoric patterns of narration and storytelling and that they are best studied as holistic patterns per se, not as sentences that can be divided into separate subordinate or coordinated clauses. It will also be suggested that their narrative power is, however, motivated by the more standard uses of the differing coordinate and subordinate conjunctions. One of these conjunctions is special: kunnes as a conjunction is a narrative device anticipating a dramatic change in the course of action, rather than a means of marking a clause as background information the way subordinating conjunctions normally do. Therefore, if something can be seen as the governing part in this kind of kunnes use, it is not just a single clause but an overall action and chain of events described earlier. Examining these rhetoric structures can shed light on subordination as a phenomenon in general. The article ends with a discussion of subordination, subordinate conjunctions and different descriptions of subordination.
Published online: 04 September 2014
Abbott, H. Porter
2010 “Subordinated Activities?” A Conference Presentation in the Conference Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives on Subordination . Helsinki, March 8–10, 2010.
Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman
Goldberg, Adele E
ISK = Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho
2007a “Borderline Case: Subordination on not – Subordination in Idiomatic, Rhetoric when or until Constructions.” Presentation in Conference 10th International Pragmatics Conference . Göteborg, July 8–13, 2007.
2007b “Puheen imitatiivikonstruktioita: proadverbin ja proadjektiivin “sitomat” imitatiivi/ele-konstruktiot puheessa.” [Imitative constructions of speech: Imitative/gesture constructions bound by a proadverd or a proadjective in speech]. A Conference Presentation. XXXIV Kielitieteen päivät , Oulu, May 24–25, 2007.
2013 “Todisteena äänen kuva: suomen kielen imitatiivikonstruktiot.” [Representations of sound as evidence: imitative constructions in Finnish]. Doctoral thesis. The University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Nordic Studies. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-8860-5.
forthcoming. “Onomatopoeettisuuden äännesymboliikkaa suomessa. Esimerkkinä imitatiivit.” [Sound symbolism in Finnish. Imitatives as examples]. Article.
Jääskeläinen, Anni, and Aino Koivisto
Laury, Ritva, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen
Langacker, Ronald W
2010 Lecture in Seminar Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives on Subordination . Helsinki, March 8–10, 2010.
Leino, Pentti, Ilona Herlin, Suvi Honkanen, Lari Kotilainen, Jaakko Leino, and Maija Vilkkumaa
NS = Nykysuomen sanakirja
Dictionary of contemporary Finnish], niteet 1–3, 1966, lyhentämätön kansanpainos. Päätoimittaja Matti Sadeniemi. Valtion toimeksiannosta teettänyt Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura. Helsinki: WSOY.
Oswalt, Robert L
Seppänen, Eeva-Leena, and Ritva Laury
Taylor, John R