Article published in:
Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
Edited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 203221
References
Camus, Albert
1942 [1998]L’étranger. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Catach, Nina
1994 [1996] La ponctuation. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1988“Punctuation and the Prosody of Written Language.” Written Communication 5: 396–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi-Jonin, Injoo, and Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie
2006“L’association de propositions sans marque segmentale en français parlé: étude syntactico-sémantique et prosodique”. In Faits de Langues 28: “Coordination et subordination: typologie et modélisation, ed. by I. Brill, and G. Rebuschi, 83–94. Paris/Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2000“Prosody.” In Handbook of Pragmatics 2000, ed. by Jef 
Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2005Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan
1986 [1997]Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre
1966 “Les dix intonations de base du français.” French ReviewOct. 1966: 1–14.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, Albert
1998“Intonation in French.” In Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, ed. by D. Hirst, and A. Di Cristo, 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drillon, Jacques
1991Traité de la ponctuation française. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Feuillet, Jack
1990“Place de la coordination.” L’information grammaticale 46: 4–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A., and Robert D. van Valin
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fónagy, Ivan, and Judith Fónagy
1983“L’intonation et l’organisation du discours.” BSLP 78 (1): 161–209.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992“Contextualization Revisited.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by P. Auer, and A. Di Luzio, 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1985Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995“The Converb as a Cross-linguistically Valid Category.” In Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. by M. Haspelmath, and E. König, 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. 
Volume I. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Descriptive Application. 
Volume II. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. New York: Mouton de 
Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in this volume. “Subordination in a Dynamic Account of Grammar.”
Lehtinen, Mari
2007“L’interprétation prosodique des signes de ponctuation – L’exemple de la lecture radiophonique de L’Étranger d’Albert Camus.” L’information grammaticale 113: 23–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008La contextualisation du discours radiophonique par des moyens prosodique. L’exemple de cinq grands philosophes français du XXe siècle. Doctoral thesis. [Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki LXXIV]. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki. Available also online at: http://​urn​.fi​/URN. ISBN: 978-952-10-5173-9.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Philippe
1987“Prosodic and Rhythmic Structures in French.” Linguistics 25: 925–949. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, Piet
1987L’intonation du français. De la description linguistique à la reconnaissance automatique. Doctoral thesis. Leuven: University of Leuven.Google Scholar
2008“Syntaxe, prosodie et structure informationnelle: une approche prédicative pour l’analyse de l’intonation dans le discours.” Travaux de Linguistique 56 (1): 87–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011“Prosodie, syntaxe et discours: autour d’une approche prédictive.” In Actes d’IDP 2009 , ed. by H.-Y. Yoo, and E. Delais-Roussarie, Paris (France), September 9–11, 2009, 19–32. Published online at: http://​makino​.linguist​.jussieu​.fr​/idp09​/actes​_fr​.html.
Morel, Mary-Annick, and Laurent Danon-Boileau
1998Grammaire de l’intonation. L’exemple du français. Paris/Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Rebuschi, Georges
2001 “Coordination et subordination. Première partie: la co-jonction restreinte.” Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris XCVI (1): 23–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1984“Principles of Gestalt Perception in the Temporal Organization of Narrative Texts.” Linguistics 22: 779–809.Google Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Jean-Christophe Pellat, and René Rioul
1994 [2004]Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Rossi, Mario
1981“Continuation et question.” In L’Intonation: de l’Acoustique à la Sémantique, ed. by M. Rossi, A. Di Cristo, D. Hirst, P. Martin, and Y. Nishimura, 149–178. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1999L’intonation, le système du français: description et modélisation. Paris/Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1978“Figure and Ground in Complex Sentences.” In Universals of Human Language, Volume 4: Syntax, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsick, 625–649. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge / London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
1987““Subordination” and Narrative Event Structure.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 435–454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S
1985“Foreground-Background Information and the Syntax of Subordination.” Text 5: 85–122.Google Scholar
van Valin, Robert D., and Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax. Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Védénina, Ludmilla G
1989Pertinence linguistique de la présentation typographique. Paris: Peeters / Selaf.Google Scholar
Wagner, Robert L., and Jaqueline Pinchon
1991Grammaire du français classique et moderne. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2000Intonation in Text and Discourse. Beginnings, Middles and Ends. 
Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Mari
2012“La prosodie et les signes de ponctuation – une approche expérimentale.” In Actes du XVIIIe congrès des romanistes scandinaves [Romanica Gothoburgensia 69], ed. by E. Ahlstedt, K. Benson, E. Bladh, I. Söhrman, and U. Åkerström, Gothenburg (Sweden), Acta universitatis Gothoburgensis, August 9–12, 2011, 788–800. Gothenburg: GUPEA. Published online at: https://​gupea​.ub​.gu​.se​/bitstream​/2077​/30607​/5​/gupea​_2077​_30607​_5​.pdf.Google Scholar
2013“Le rôle de la prosodie dans l’indication de la relation entre les propositions subordonnées circonstancielles et les propositions principales.” In Comparing and Contrasting Syntactic Structures. From Dependency to Quasi-subordination [Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 86], ed. by E. Havu, and I. Hyvärinen, 17–44. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.Google Scholar