Contrastive relations, evaluation, and generic structure in science news
Assuming a close relation between generic structure and coherence structure,
this paper attempts to classify the meanings linked by contrastive relations in
the genre of science news. The analysis reveals five typical configurations recurrent
in the genre which are characterized predominantly by linguistic evaluation
and the entities or situations evaluated. The units observed are discussed
from three different perspectives: first, from a narrowly semantic point of view;
second, with regard to their strategic role in fulfilling the texts’ genre-specific
purpose; and finally, with regard to their role in the evaluative coherence in the
texts, using both a focus-based and a relational approach to coherence.
References
Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara, and Yvette Yannick Mathieu
Asher, Nicolas, and Alex Lascarides
2003 Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bednarek, Monika
2006 Evaluation in Media Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.

Bednarek, Monika
2009b “Polyphony in Appraisal: Typological and Topological Perspectives.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3 (2): 107–136.

Bell, Allan
1991 The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, Jonah, and Katherine L. Milkman
2010 Social Transmission, Emotion, and the Virality of Online Content. Accessed January 11, 2012.
[URL]
Biber, Douglas, and Budsaba Kanoksilaptham
2007 “Introduction to Move Analysis.” In
Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure, ed. by
Douglas Biber,
Ulla Connor, and
Thomas A. Upton, 23–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Fahnestock, Jeanne
1986 “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.” Written Communication 3 (3): 275–296.


Fahnestock, Jeanne
2004 “Preserving the Figure: Consistency in the Presentation of Scientific Arguments.” Written Communication 21 (1): 6–31.


Ford, Cecilia E
2000 “The Treatment of Contrasts in Interaction.” In
Cause–Condition–Concession–Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by
Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and
Bernd Kortmann, 283–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Gruber, Helmut, and Peter Muntigl
2005 “
Generic and Rhetorical Structures of Texts: Two Sides of the Same Coin?”
Folia Linguistica 39 (1/2): 75–113.


Haupt, Jaromír
2010 “Palpated, Phonendoscoped, X-rayed and Tomographed: The Structure of Science News in Good Shape.” In
Interpretation of Meaning across Discourses, ed. by
Renata Jančaříková, 161–174. Brno: Masaryk University.

Haupt, Jaromír
2014 “
Generic and Evaluative Patterns in Science News.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Masaryk University.
Heuboeck, Alois
2009 “
Some Aspects of Coherence, Genre, and Rhetorical Structure – And Their Integration in a Generic Model of Text.”
Language Studies Working Papers (1): 35–45.

Hilgartner, Stephen
1990 “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519–539.


Hoey, Michael
1983 On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.

Hoey, Michael
2001 Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Routledge.

Hoey, Michael
2005 Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London/New York: Routledge.

Hyland, Ken
2000 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.

Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez, and Peter R. R. White
1994 Media Literacy. Sydney, Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education.

Jordan, Michael P
1985 Rhetoric of Everyday English Texts. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Jordan, Michael P
1985 “Some Relations of Surprise and Expectation.” In
The 11th LACUS Forum 1984, ed. by
Robert A. Hall Jr., 263–273. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.

Kortmann, Bernd
1991 Absolute Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London/New York: Routledge.

Lakoff, Robin T
1971 “If’s, And’s, But’s about Conjunction.” In
Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. by
Charles J. Fillmore, and
D. Terence Langendoen, 114–149. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
1988 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8 (3): 243–281.

Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.


Motta-Roth, Désirée, and Cristina dos Santos Lovato
2009 “Organização retórica do gênero notícia de popularização da ciencia: um estudo comparativo entre português e inglês [The rhetorical organization of the genre of popular-scientific reports: A comparative study of Portuguese and English].”
Linguagem em (Dis)Curso 9 (2): 233–271.


Myers, Greg
1990 Writing Biology: The Social Construction of Popular Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Myers, Greg
2003 “Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries.” Discourse Studies 5 (2): 265–279.


Nwogu, Kevin N
1991 “The Structure of Science Popularizations: A Genre-analysis Approach to the Schema of Popularized Medical Texts.” English for Specific Purposes 10: 111–123.


O’Halloran, Kieran
2009 “Implicit Dialogical Premises, Explanation as Argument: A Corpus-based Reconstruction.” Informal Logic 29 (1): 15–53.

Scherer, Anelise S
2010 “Explicit Intertextuality in Science Popularization News.” Revista Ao pé da Letra 12 (2): 25–49.

Spenader, Jennifer, and Gert Stulp
2007 “
Antonymy and Contrast Relations.” In
Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics
, Tilburg, 10–11 January.
Suhardja, Imelda
2008 “
Discourse of ‘Distortion’ and Health and Medical News Reports: A Genre Analysis Perspective.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Edinburgh.
Swales, John
1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taboada, Maite, and William C. Mann
2006 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423–459.


Taboada, Maite, Kimberly Voll, and Julian Brooke
2008 “
Extracting Sentiment as a Function of Discourse Structure and Topicality.”
School of Computing Science Technical Report 2008-20
.
Thetela, Puleng
1997 “Evaluated Entities and Parameters of Value in Academic Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 101–118.


Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston
2000 “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In
Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by
Susan Hunston, and
Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, Geoff
1998 “Resonance in Text.” In
Linguistic Choice across Genres: Variation in Spoken and Written English, ed. by
Antonia Sanchez-Macarro, and
Ronald Carter, 29–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Thompson, Geoff, and Jianglin Zhou
2000 “Evaluation and Organization in Text: The Structuring Role of Evaluative Disjuncts.” In
Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by
Susan Hunston, and
Geoff Thompson, 122–141. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Urbanová, Zuzana
2013 “The Hard News Report: The Beginning, Middle and End.” In
Silesian Studies 2012: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of English and American Studies, ed. by
Markéta Johnová, and
Michaela Weiss, 137–154. Opava: Silesian University in Opava.

van Dijk, Teun A
1988 News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

van Dijk, Teun A
1998 Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.

White, Peter R. R
1997 “Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass-Media Hard News Reporting.” In
Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by
Francis Christie, and
James R. Martin, 101–133. London: Cassell.

White, Peter R. R
2000 “Media Objectivity and the Rhetoric of News Story Structure.” In
Discourse and Community. Doing Functional Linguistics Language in Performance 21, ed. by
Eija Ventola, 379–397. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

Winter, Eugene O
1974 “
Replacement as a Function of Repetition: A Study of Some of Its Principal Features in the Clause Relations of Contemporary English.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Xiao, Hao-Zhang, Chen-Yu Dai & Li-Zheng Dong
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.