Contrastive relations, evaluation, and generic structure in science news
Assuming a close relation between generic structure and coherence structure,
this paper attempts to classify the meanings linked by contrastive relations in
the genre of science news. The analysis reveals five typical configurations recurrent
in the genre which are characterized predominantly by linguistic evaluation
and the entities or situations evaluated. The units observed are discussed
from three different perspectives: first, from a narrowly semantic point of view;
second, with regard to their strategic role in fulfilling the texts’ genre-specific
purpose; and finally, with regard to their role in the evaluative coherence in the
texts, using both a focus-based and a relational approach to coherence.
References (54)
Asher, Nicolas, and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bednarek, Monika. 2009b. “Polyphony in Appraisal: Typological and Topological Perspectives.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3 (2): 107–136.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, Allan. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berger, Jonah, and Katherine L. Milkman. 2010. Social Transmission, Emotion, and the Virality of Online Content. Accessed January 11, 2012. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, and Budsaba Kanoksilaptham. 2007. “Introduction to Move Analysis.” In Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure, ed. by Douglas Biber, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton, 23–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1986. “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.” Written Communication 3 (3): 275–296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2004. “Preserving the Figure: Consistency in the Presentation of Scientific Arguments.” Written Communication 21 (1): 6–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ford, Cecilia E. 2000. “The Treatment of Contrasts in Interaction.” In Cause–Condition–Concession–Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 283–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gruber, Helmut, and Peter Muntigl. 2005. “Generic and Rhetorical Structures of Texts: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” Folia Linguistica 39 (1/2): 75–113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haupt, Jaromír. 2010. “Palpated, Phonendoscoped, X-rayed and Tomographed: The Structure of Science News in Good Shape.” In Interpretation of Meaning across Discourses, ed. by Renata Jančaříková, 161–174. Brno: Masaryk University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haupt, Jaromír. 2014. “Generic and Evaluative Patterns in Science News.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Masaryk University.
Heuboeck, Alois. 2009. “Some Aspects of Coherence, Genre, and Rhetorical Structure – And Their Integration in a Generic Model of Text.” Language Studies Working Papers (1): 35–45.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilgartner, Stephen. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science 20 (3): 519–539. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoey, Michael. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoey, Michael. 2001. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London/New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez, and Peter R. R. White. 1994. Media Literacy. Sydney, Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordan, Michael P. 1985. Rhetoric of Everyday English Texts. London: George Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordan, Michael P. 1985. “Some Relations of Surprise and Expectation.” In The 11th LACUS Forum 1984, ed. by Robert A. Hall Jr., 263–273. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Absolute Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London/New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, Robin T. 1971. “If’s, And’s, But’s about Conjunction.” In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. by Charles J. Fillmore, and D. Terence Langendoen, 114–149. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8 (3): 243–281.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Motta-Roth, Désirée, and Cristina dos Santos Lovato. 2009. “Organização retórica do gênero notícia de popularização da ciencia: um estudo comparativo entre português e inglês [The rhetorical organization of the genre of popular-scientific reports: A comparative study of Portuguese and English].” Linguagem em (Dis)Curso 9 (2): 233–271. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: The Social Construction of Popular Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, Greg. 2003. “Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries.” Discourse Studies 5 (2): 265–279. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nwogu, Kevin N. 1991. “The Structure of Science Popularizations: A Genre-analysis Approach to the Schema of Popularized Medical Texts.” English for Specific Purposes 10: 111–123. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Halloran, Kieran. 2009. “Implicit Dialogical Premises, Explanation as Argument: A Corpus-based Reconstruction.” Informal Logic 29 (1): 15–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scherer, Anelise S. 2010. “Explicit Intertextuality in Science Popularization News.” Revista Ao pé da Letra 12 (2): 25–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spenader, Jennifer, and Gert Stulp. 2007. “Antonymy and Contrast Relations.” In
Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics
, Tilburg, 10–11 January.
Suhardja, Imelda. 2008. “Discourse of ‘Distortion’ and Health and Medical News Reports: A Genre Analysis Perspective.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Edinburgh.
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taboada, Maite, and William C. Mann. 2006. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423–459. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taboada, Maite, Kimberly Voll, and Julian Brooke. 2008. “Extracting Sentiment as a Function of Discourse Structure and Topicality.”
School of Computing Science Technical Report 2008-20
.
Thetela, Puleng. 1997. “Evaluated Entities and Parameters of Value in Academic Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 101–118. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston. 2000. “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Geoff. 1998. “Resonance in Text.” In Linguistic Choice across Genres: Variation in Spoken and Written English, ed. by Antonia Sanchez-Macarro, and Ronald Carter, 29–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Geoff, and Jianglin Zhou. 2000. “Evaluation and Organization in Text: The Structuring Role of Evaluative Disjuncts.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 122–141. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Urbanová, Zuzana. 2013. “The Hard News Report: The Beginning, Middle and End.” In Silesian Studies 2012: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of English and American Studies, ed. by Markéta Johnová, and Michaela Weiss, 137–154. Opava: Silesian University in Opava.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, Peter R. R. 1997. “Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass-Media Hard News Reporting.” In Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by Francis Christie, and James R. Martin, 101–133. London: Cassell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, Peter R. R. 2000. “Media Objectivity and the Rhetoric of News Story Structure.” In Discourse and Community. Doing Functional Linguistics Language in Performance 21, ed. by Eija Ventola, 379–397. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winter, Eugene O. 1974. “Replacement as a Function of Repetition: A Study of Some of Its Principal Features in the Clause Relations of Contemporary English.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Xiao, Hao-Zhang, Chen-Yu Dai & Li-Zheng Dong
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.