Part of
The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence: Theories and applications
Edited by Helmut Gruber and Gisela Redeker
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 254] 2014
► pp. 87119
Anscombe, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot
1983L’Argumentation dans la Langue. Bruxelles: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides
2003Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, and Laure Vieu
2005“Subordinating and Coordinating Discourse Relations.” Lingua 115: 591–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benz, Anton, and Peter Kühnlein
2008“Constraints in Discourse. An Introduction.” In Constraints in Discourse, ed. by Anton Benz, and Peter Kühnlein, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloor, Thomas, and Meriel Bloor
1995The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola
(eds) 1999Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
1998Contrastive Functional Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael
1987“Cultural Differences in the Organization of Academic Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 211–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Nathalie Lefèvre, and Yves Bestgen
Doherty, Monika
Esser, Jürgen
2006Presentation in Language. Rethinking Speech and Writing. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2005“Negative Theme Zones in Political Interviews: A Contrastive Analysis of German and English Turn-initial Positions.” In Pressetextsorten im Vergleich. Contrasting Text Types in the Press, ed. by Andrew Chesterman, and Hartmut Lenk, 283–301. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
2008“Theme Zones in English Media Discourse. Forms and Functions.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (9): 1543–1568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton-Ann, and Talmy Givón
(eds) 1995Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993English Grammar: A Function-based Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Context as Other Minds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez-González, Maria
2001The Theme–Topic Interface. Evidence from English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara, Ararvind Joshi, and Scott Weinstein
1995“Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Local Coherence of Discourse.” Computational Linguistics 21: 203–225.Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara, and Candace Sidner
1986“Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse.” Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John
1992“Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K
1994Introduction to English Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike
1994“The Theme Zone.” In Nauwe Betrekkingen, ed. by Ronney Boogart, and Jan Noordegraaf, 107–117. Amsterdam: Neerlandistiek and Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
1996“Contrastive Discourse Analysis and Misunderstanding: The Case of German and English.” In Contrastive Sociolinguistics, ed. by Marlies Hellinger, and Ulrich Ammon, 345–361. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, and Uwe Reyle
1993From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Karagjosova, Elena
2003“Modal Particles and the Common Ground.” In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium, ed. by Peter Kühnlein, Hannes Rieser, and Henk Zeevat, 335–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1997“Zur Bedeutung von Modalpartikeln im Deutschen: Ein Neuansatz im Rahmen der Relevanztheorie.” Germanistische Linguistik 136: 57–75.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred, and Caroline Féry
2008“Information Structure. Notional Distinctions, Ways of Expression.” In Unity and Diversity of Languages, ed. by Piet van Sterkenburg, 123–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomas
1989“Towards a Typology of Contrastive Studies.” In Contrastive Pragmatics, ed. by Wieslaw Oleksy, 55–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursual
2010Argument and Rhetoric – Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1979“Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liedtke, Frank
1997“Gesagt? getan: Über illokutionäre Indikatoren.” Linguistische Berichte 8: 189–213.Google Scholar
Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
1987“Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of Text Structures.” In Natural Language Generation, ed. by Gerard Kempen, 85–95. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988“Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8: 243–281.Google Scholar
Martin, Jim R., and David Rose
2008Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984“Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John Atkinson, and John M. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1982“Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics.” Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1997“Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze.” In Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. by Christa Dürscheid, Karl-Heinz Ramers, and Monika Schwarz, 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1995Lectures on Conversation, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1995“Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soria, Claudia, and Giacomo Ferrari
1998 “Lexical Marking of Discourse Relations – Some Experimental Findings.” Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers , 36–42. Montréal.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Speyer, Augustin
2010“Die Markierung von Diskursrelationen im Frühneuhochdeutschen.” Sprachwissenschaft 35: 409–442.Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul
2003“Contextualization and Social Meaning-making Practices.” In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan Eerdmans, et al., 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A
1980Textwissenschaft. München: dtv. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry
2004Text, Context, and Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wöllstein, Angelika
2010Topologisches Satzmodell. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hofmockel, Carolin, Anita Fetzer, Robert M. Maier, Patrick Saint-Dizier & Manfred Stede
2017. Discourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse. Argument & Computation 8:2  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Speyer, Augustin
2022. Discourse relations and the German prefield. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275],  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Irina Mikaelian
2018. Русское а: опыт интегрального описания. Russian Linguistics 42:3  pp. 321 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.