Cover not available
Part of
Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions
Edited by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256] 2015
► pp. 1–23

Researching interactional forms and participant structures in public and social media

ORCID logo
ORCID logo
Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.01cho
References
Alexander, Bryan
2011 The New Digital Storytelling. Creating Narratives with New Media. Santa Barbara, Denver and Oxford: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ayass, Ruth
2012 “Introduction: Media Appropriation and Everyday Life.” In The Appropriation of Media in Everyday Life, ed. by Ruth Ayass and Cornelia Gerhardt, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayass, Ruth, and Cornelia Gerhardt
(eds) 2012 The Appropriation of Media in Everyday Life. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, Naomi
1998 “Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email.” Language and Communication 18: 133–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Discourse Structures in Instant Messaging: The Case of Utterance Breaks.” Language@Internet 7.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2010 The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society 13: 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolander, Brook
2013 Language and Power in Blogs. Interaction, Agreements and Disagreements. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosker, Bianca
2013 “Facebook’s Rapidly Declining Popularity with Teens in 1 Chart.” The Huffington Post 23 October 2013, [URL].Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17: 501–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brock, Alexander
2011 “Bumcivilian – Systemic Aspects of Humorous Communication in Comedies.” In Telecinematic Discourse. Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, ed. by Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Axel
2008 Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond. From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bubel, Claudia
2008 “Film Audiences as Overhearers.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 55–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934 Sprachtheorie. Oxford, England: Fischer.Google Scholar
Burger, Harald
1984 Sprache der Massenmedien. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991 Das Gesprach in den Massenmedien. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cannarella, John, and Joshua A. Spechler
2014 “Epidemiological Modeling of Online Social Network Dynamics.” [URL]
Chovanec, Jan
2010 “Online Discussion and Interaction: The Case of Live Text Commentary.” In Cases on Online Discussion and Interaction: Experiences and Outcomes, ed. by Leonard Shedletsky and Joan Aitken, 234–251. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Humour in Quasi-conversations: Constructing Fun in Online Sports Journalism.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 243–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. “Participating with Media.” In Routledge Handbook of Language and Media ed. by Colleen Cotter and Daniel Perrin
Clark, Herbert
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Thomas Carlson
1982 “Hearers and Speech Acts.” Language 58: 332–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Edward Schaefer
1987 “Concealing One’s Meaning from Overhearers.” Journal of Memory and Language 26: 209–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Dealing with Overhearers.” In Arenas of Language Use, ed. by Herbert Clark, 248–273. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002 The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’hondt, Sigurd, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren
(eds) 2009 The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desilla, Louisa
2012 “Implicatures in Film: Construal and Functions in Bridget Jones Romantic Comedies.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 30–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2010 “Not Hearing Things – Hearer/Listener Categories in Polylogues.” mediAzioni 9. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
2011 “Revisiting Goffman’s Postulates on Participant Statuses in Verbal Interaction.” Language and Linguistics Compass. Sociolinguistics 5/7: 454–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011a “Entertaining and Enraging: The Functions of Verbal Violence in Broadcast Political Debates.” In Studies in Political Humour, ed. by Villy Tsakona and Diana Popa, 109–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b “Two Communicative Levels and Twofold Illocutionary Force in Televised Political Debates.” Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47 (2): 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011c “ ‘You Talking to Me?’ The Viewer as a Ratified Listener to Film Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1628–1644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011d “I’ll be There for You: On Participation-based Sitcom Humour.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, ed. by Marta Dynel, 311–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Setting our House in Order: The Workings of Impoliteness in Multi-party Film Discourse.” Journal of Politeness Research 8: 161–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Impoliteness as Disaffiliative Humour in Film Talk.” In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 105–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 . “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 73 :37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
1999 “Challenging the Unspoken: Exploiting the Ideology in and of Political Interviews.” In Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. 1, ed. by Jeff Verschueren, 8–113. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
2000 “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews.” Text 20 (4): 1–46.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Minister, we will see how the Public Judges You. Media References in Political Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 180–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The ‘Culture Wars’”. Journal of Politeness Research 5: 273–303.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2013 “Relational Work in Anonymous, Asynchronous Aommunication: A Study of (Dis)affiliation in YouTube.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 343–365. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garside, Juliette
2013 “Facebook Loses millions of Users as Biggest Markets Peak.” The Guardian 29 April 2013, [URL].Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Cornelia
2008 “Talk by Television Viewers Watching Live Football Matches: Coherence Through Interactionality, Intertextuality, and Multimodality.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Saarbrücken: University of Saarland.
Goffman, Erving
1964 “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist 66 :133–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974 Frame Analysis. An Essay in the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1985 “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–119. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and David Greatbatch
1991 “On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The case of News Interviews.” In Talk and Social Structure, ed. by Don Boden and Deirdre H. Zimmerman, 95–129. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Andrew Roth
1995 “Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 1–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan
1996 “Two Variants of an Electronic Message Schema.” In Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Susan Herring, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-mediated Discourse.” Language@Internet 4.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
(eds) 2013 Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
1991 “The Organisation of Talk on Talk Radio.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 119–137. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2005 “Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcast Talk.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 437–460. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006 Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1972 “Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1974 Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960 “Closing Statements: Linguistics and Poetics”. In Style In Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Graham, and Bambi Schieffelin
2009 “Talking Text and Talking Back: ‘My BFF Jill’ from Boob Tube to YouTube.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14: 1050–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H
2003 “Mass Media Communication at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century. Dimensions of Change.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4: 129–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, Michael Haugh, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2013 “Aggression and Perceived National Face Threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC Discussion Boards.” Multilingua 32 (3): 343–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozloff, Sarah
2000 Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Participation Framework.” In Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lister, Martin, Jon Dovey, Seth Giddings, Iain Grant, and Kelly Kieran
2009 New Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia, and Peter Lunt
1994 Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam
2006 Advice Online. Advice-Giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
2009 Television Discourse. Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2578–2593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matheson, Donald
2005 Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Moor, Peter, Ard Heuvelman, and Ria Verleur
2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior 26: 1536–1546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, Merrill, and Christine Ogan
1996 “The Internet as a Mass Medium.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1: 0. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne
2006 Investigating Media Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012 “Media and Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Paul James Gee and Michael Handford, 441–454. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Tim
2005 “What is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”. 30.92005, [URL]
Piazza, Roberta
2011 The Discourse of Italian Cinema and Beyond: Let Cinema Speak. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi
(eds) 2011 Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Film and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poole, Marshall, and Michele Jackson
1993 “Communication Theory and Group Support Systems.” In Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, ed. by Leonard Jessup and Joseph Valacich, 281–293. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kay
2010 Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Fabio
2011 “Discourse Analysis of Film Dialogues: Italian Comedy between Linguistic Realism and Pragmatic Non-realism.” In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, ed. by Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi, 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scannell, Paddy
1991 “Introduction: The Relevance of Talk.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 1–13. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Scannell, Paddy, and David Cardiff
1991 A Social History of British Broadcasting. Serving the Nation, 1922–1939. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schober, Michael, and Herbert Clark
1989 “Understanding by Addressees and Overhearers.” Cognitive Psychology 21: 211–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, Mick
1981 “Discourse Analysis and the Analysis of Drama.” Applied Linguistics 2: 180–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 “Discourse Analysis and Drama.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Ron Asher, 949–952. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2009 “Participation.” The Pragmatics of Interaction, ed. by Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 125–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Mary
2007 Media Discourse: Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
1986 “The Dynamics of Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Lancaster University, UK.
Thompson, John
1995 The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Tolson, Andrew
2001 “Talking about Talk: The Academic Debates.” In Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle, ed. by Andrew Tolson, 7–31. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006 Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “A New Authenticity? Communicative Practices on YouTube.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (4): 277–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanoye, Francis
1985 “Conversations Publiques.” Iris 3 (1): 99–188.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2008 Positioning in Media Discourse: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, Simeon
2000 “Computer-mediated Communication: The Future of the Letter?” In Letter Writing as a Social Practice, ed. by David Barton and Nigel Hall, 233–251. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2011 Cyberpragmatics. Inernet Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Altahmazi, Thulfiqar Hussein M.
2022. Impoliteness in Twitter diplomacy: offence giving and taking in Middle East diplomatic crises. Journal of Politeness Research 18:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Sitian, Yinglei Zang & Ping Yang
2024. City images in transnational travel vlogs from a multimodal perspective: an investigation of 20 port cities worldwide. Online Media and Global Communication 0:0 DOI logo
Chovanec, Jan
2017. Chapter 10. From adverts to letters to the editor. In Diachronic Developments in English News Discourse [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 6], ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Chovanec, Jan & Villy Tsakona
2018. Chapter 1. Investigating the dynamics of humor. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor [Topics in Humor Research, 7], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta & Fabio IM Poppi
2018. In tragoedia risus: Analysis of dark humour in post-terrorist attack discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:4 ► pp. 382 ff. DOI logo
Gruber, Helmut
2018. Debating or displaying political positions?. Pragmatics and Society 9:4 ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Johansson, Marjut, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen & Jan Chovanec
2021. Practices of Convergence and Controversy in Digital Discourses. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Konyaeva, Yulia
2021. Technological Factors of Formation of the Speech Etiquette in Online Communication. In Speech Etiquette in Slavic Online Communities, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Locher, Miriam A. & Brook Bolander
2015. Humour in microblogging. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256], ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Rossette-Crake, Fiona
2022. Oratory as Communication Setup (II): Towards a Typology That Incorporates Technological Mediation. In Digital Oratory as Discursive Practice [Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. The digital agora of social media: Introduction. Discourse, Context & Media 19 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.