Article published in:Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions
Edited by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256] 2015
► pp. 135–155
Humour in microblogging
Exploiting linguistic humour strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups
Research within interpersonal pragmatics highlights the relational aspect of language in use (Locher and Graham 2010). While this focus has especially been dealt with in politeness research, it can also be fruitfully combined with the study of identity construction through language (see Locher 2008). The use of humour is such a means of identity construction since showing a sense of humour in interaction is valued in many contexts. This chapter reports on a project on Facebook status updates (see Bolander and Locher 2010, Locher and Bolander 2014) and thus provides insights into identity construction in an interactive Web 2.0 social network site, where the participation framework is such that status updates are written in a semi-public environment in front of an audience of ratified Facebook friends, who can decide to move from the role of overhearer/eavesdropper to participating actively. We conducted a qualitative discourse analytic study of how humour is used in status updates by participants of two Facebook focus groups. These humorous acts of microblogging (Zhao and Rosson 2009; Yus 2011; Zappavigna 2012) are contrasted with different types of identity construction in the other status updates. While some but not all convey that they have a sense of humour, others also evoke identities in connection with other personality traits, as well as making pastime, work, and relationships claims.
Published online: 12 February 2015
Cited by other publications
Bolander, Brook & Miriam A. Locher
Chovanec, Jan & Villy Tsakona
Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander & Nicole Höhn
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Baron, Naomi S., Lauren Squires, Sara Tench, and Marshall Thompson
1995 “The Performance of Humour in Computer-mediated Communication.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 1 (2). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue2/baym.html (2013-06-13).
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
In press. “‘Peter is a Dumb Nut’: Status Updates and Reactions to them as ‘Acts of Positioning’ in Facebook.” Pragmatics.
Boyd, Danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison
2007 “Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html (2012-07-07).
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
Chovanec, Jan, and Marta Dynel
This volume. “Researching Interactional Forms and Participant Structures in Public and Social Media”.
Danet, Brenda, Lucia Ruedenberg-Wright, and Yehudit Rosenbaum-Tamari
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré
2011 “Facebook is Testing a “Translate” button for Comments on Pages.” Available at: http://www.insidefacebook.com/2011/9/ 02/facebook-testing-translate-button-comments/ (Accessed on 1 July 2013).
Ess, CharlesThe AoIR Ethics Working Committee
and 2002 “Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the aoir Ethics Working Committee.” Available at: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (Accessed on 6 July 2012).
Eysenbach, Gunther, and James E. Till
Herring, Susan C.
Jucker, Andreas H., and Christa Dürscheid
2012 “The Linguistics of Keyboard-to-Screen Communication. A New Terminological Framework.” Linguistik Online 56 (6/12): 39–64. Available at: http://www.linguistik-online.com/56_12/juckerDuerscheid.pdf (Accessed on 13 June 2013).
Locher, Miriam A.
Locher, Miriam A., and Brook Bolander
Locher, Miriam A., and Sage L. Graham
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
Markham, Annette, and Elizabeth Buchanancontributions from the AOIR Ethics Working Committee
with 2012 Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research 2.0: Recommendations from the Aoir Ethics Working Committee. Available at: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf (2013-04-05).
Morris, Merrill, and Christine Ogan
1996 “The Internet as a Mass Medium.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1(4). Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00174.x/full. (Accessed on 24 November 2014).
Nastri, Jacqueline, Jorge Peña, and Jeffrey T. Hancock
2006 “The Construction of away Messages: A Speech Act Analysis.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(4), article 7. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/nastri.html (Accessed on 13 June 2013).
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Charley Rowe
Shifman, Limor and Dafna Lemish
Thurlow, Crispin, and Kristine Mroczek
Vandergriff, Ilona, and Carolin Fuchs
2009 “Does CMC Promote Language Play? Exploring Humor in Two Modalities.” CALICO Journal 27(1). Available at: https://calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=778 (Accessed on 13 June 2013).
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Helmick Beavin, and Don D. Jackson
West, Laura, and Anna Marie Trester
Zhao, Shanyang, Sherri Grasmuck, and Jason Martin
Zhao, Dejin and Mary Beth Rosson
2009 “How and Why People Twitter: The Role that Micro–blogging Plays in Informal Communication at Work.” Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work , 243–252.
2010 “Giving You More Control.” Available at: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=434691727130 (Accessed on 19 June 2013).