Cover not available
Part of
Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions
Edited by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256] 2015
► pp. 259–280

Enhancing citizen engagement

Political weblogs and participatory democracy

This chapter discusses the function of blogs as tools enhancing citizen participation in political communication. Adopting the perspective of corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis, a set of blogs from the US presidential election campaign are analysed in order to determine the frequency of reference to the candidates, the parties, as well as the bloggers themselves. The analysis of pronoun choice, verbs and modality indicate that blogs enhance participation rhetoric. The data further indicate that citizen bloggers attach more importance to individual political figures than party bloggers do. The tendency to refer to the candidates rather than to their political affiliation may be explained as evidence that people not belonging to parties interpret politics as a struggle between different politicians and not between different ideologies. Since the language representation of the political scene in citizens’ blogs shows distinct traces of the ongoing process of personalization of politics, the political blog can be considered as a “tool of citizen empowerment”.

Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.11rib
References
Bateman, John A
2008 Modality and Genre. A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of the Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
2000 “Mire usted Sr. González… Personal deixis in Spanish Political-Electoral Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Axel, and Joanne Jacobs
(eds) 2006 Uses of Blogs. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
2006 “Who are We and Who are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.” Text and Talk 26 (1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie
2010 “Self-Mediation: New Media and Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (4): 227–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kim E., and Kenneth J. Gergen
(eds) 1985 The Social Construction of the Person. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Dieltjens, Sylvain, and Priscilla Heynderickx
2007 “Strategic Uses of the Pronoun We in Business Communication.” In Discourse, Ideology and Specialized Communication, ed. by ­Giuliana Garzone and Srikant Sarangi, 233–247. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek
1991 “Categories are for Talking: On the Cognitive and Discursive Bases of Categorization.” Theory and Psychology 1 (4): 515–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 “Whorf’s Empty Gasoline Drum and the Pope’s Missing Wife.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 215–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Discourse and Cognition. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
2005 “Discursive Psychology.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch and R. E. Sanders, 257–273. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana, and Francesca Santulli
2004 “What Can Corpus Linguistics Do for Critical Discourse Analysis?” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley and Louann Haarman, 351–368. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J
1991 The Saturated Self, Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
1994 Realities and Relationships, Soundings in Social Construction. ­Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessy, Cari Lynn, and Paul S. Martin
2006 “Blogs, the Mainstream Media, and the War in Iraq.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference , Philadelphia, 28–31 August.
Hyland, Ken
2005 Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Iñigo-Mora, Isabel
2004 “On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Maitland, Kand, and John Wilson
1987 “Ideological Conflict and Pronominal Resolution.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 495–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael. P
2012 “Turnout in the 2012 Presidential Elections.” The Huffington Post 11 February 2013 [URL].Google Scholar
Pole, Antoinette
2010 Blogging the Political. Politics and Participation in a Networked Society. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Pyykkö, Ritta
2002 “Who is ‘us’ in Russian Political Discourse.” In Us and Others. Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures, ed. by Anna Duszak, 233–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell
1987 Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London, Newbury Park, Beverly Hills and New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Riboni, Giorgia
2011 “The Successful 2008 Presidential Candidate: How Political Weblogs Have Contributed in Shaping the American Electorate’s Preferences.” In Displaying Competence in Organizations: Discourse Perspectives, ed. by Priscilla Heynderickx, Katja ­Pelsmaekers, Craig Rollo, and Tom van Hout, 60–89. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Schotter, John
1975 Images of Man in Psychological Research. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
1984 Social Accountability and Selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2008 WordSmith Tools [URL]
Simpson, Paul
1993 Language, Ideology and Point of View. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1996 Text and Corpus Linguistics. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
2001 Words and Phrases. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Trippi, Joe
2008 The Revolution Will Not Be Televised. Democracy, the Internet and the Overthrow of Everything. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
2002 “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” In Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul A. Chilton and C. Schäffner, 203–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G
1995 “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallsten, Kevin
2005 “Political Blogs and the Bloggers Who Blog Them: Is the Political Blogosphere and [sic] Echo Chamber?” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference , Washington, DC, 1–4 September.
Woodly, Deva
2008 “New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation.” Public Choice 134: 109–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar