Article published in:
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 114
References

References

Atifi, Hassan, and Michel Marcoccia
2012 “Follow-Ups in Online Political Discussions.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 22–34. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte​/2012​/7165​/; URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962/1976How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent
1992 “Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and Littman and Allen.” In Intentions in Communication, ed. by Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan and Martha E. Pollack, 389–400. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Lawrence N.
2007 “Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” In Context and Appropriateness: Micro Meets Macro, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 176–215. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Fighting Words: Hybrid Discourse and Discourse Processes.” In Context and Contexts, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 41–65. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter
2015“Follow-Ups in Broadcast Political Discourse: Speeches, Interviews, and Parliamentary Questions.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneš, František
1974“Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text.” In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, ed. by František Daneš, 106–128. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ensink, Titus
2015 “Framing the Queen’s Head Scarf: A Case Study on Follow-Ups in Dutch Politics.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2002 “Communicative Intentions in Context.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 37–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Challenges in Political Interviews: An Intercultural Analysis.” In Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Gerda Lauerbach, 163–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1974"Some Aspects of the Chechoslovak Approach to Problems of Functional Sentence Perspective." In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, ed.by Františ e Danee (ed.), 11–37. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk van Langenhove
1991 “Varieties of Positioning.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21 (4): 393–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William and David Fanshel
1977Therapeutic Discourse. Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
1998Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Context in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob
2001Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2011 “Speech Acts in Context.” In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etskuo Oishi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mikalayeva, Liudmila
2015“Follow-ups in Pre-Structured Communication. A Case of Treaty Monitoring.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Christoph
2015“Follow-Ups in Political Talk Shows and their Visual Framing.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
1992 “Speech Acts, Effects and Responses.” In (On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle, Hermann Parret and Jef Verschueren, 101–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002a “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002b “Speech Acts in Context.” Language and Communication 22(4): 421–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffener, Christina
2015“Follow-Ups in Interpreter-Mediated Interviews and Press Conferences.” In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 “Conversation Revisited.” In (On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle, Hermann Parret and Jef Verschueren, 137–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1980Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2012 “Negotiating Irony through Follow-Ups: Readers’ Comments on Op-Eds in the Daily Press.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 263–276. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: http://​opus​.bibliothek​.uni​-wuerzburg​.de​/volltexte​/2012​/7165​/; URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar